Strengthening Students’ Employability Skills: The Development and First Evaluation of Multiple Approaches to Group Work

Salomien Hester Boshoff

doi:10.1921/gpwk.v28i2.1218

Authors

Salomien Hester Boshoff University of the Free State

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v28i2.1218

Abstract

Graduates are not always ready for the workplace, and higher education lecturers are expected to develop students’ employability skills. Group work is perceived to be an effective way to develop these skills. It is not clear, however, what types of group work are most effective for strengthening the business management student’s readiness for the workplace. Three approaches to group work were developed and implemented, namely, 1. A self-allocated group that worked together outside the classroom; 2. A random lecturer-allocated group that only undertook in-class activities; and 3. A pair that worked on a long-term community-service project. The article provides detail on the theoretical underpinnings, the application of the theory and a small-scale exploration of the perceived impact of the integrated approach. In an improvement-oriented evaluation study, business management graduates completed an open-ended questionnaire six months after starting employment. The findings suggest that integrating the three approaches in one module has the potential to improve different aspects of students’ employability skills. The insights gained from the implementation of the approach and the study could serve to guide lecturers in similar environments on how to design/plan group work in order to improve different employability skills.

References

Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C. & Norman, M. K. (2010) How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

AACU (Association of American Colleges & Universities) (2009) Raising the bar: Employers’ views on college learning in the wake of the economic downturn. AAC&U Website. [Accessed 28th November 2019 at https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2009_EmployerSurvey.pdf Google Scholar]

Azevedo, A., Apfelthaler, G. & Hurst, D. (2012) Competency development in business graduates: An industry-driven approach for examining the alignment of undergraduate business education with industry requirements. The International Journal of Management Education, 10, 1, 12-28

Babbie, E. & Mouton, J. (2001) The practice of social research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press

Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991) Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 2, 345-381

Chiriac, E. H.& Granström, K. (2012) Teachers’ leadership and students’ experience of group work. Teachers and Teaching, 18, 3, 345-363

Coetzee, M. (2014) Measuring student graduateness: Reliability and construct validity of the Graduate Skills and Attributes Scale. Higher Education Research & Development, 33,5, 887-902

Comer, D. R. (1995) A model of social loafing in real work groups. Human Relations, 48,6, 647-667

Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13,1, 3-21

Davies, W. M. (2009) Groupwork as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. Higher Education, 58, 4, 563-584

De Hei, M., Admiraal, W., Sjoer, E. & Strijbos, J. (2019) Group learning activities and perceived learning outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 43.12, 2354-2370

Erez, A., Lepine, J. A. & Elms, H. (2002) Effects of rotated leadership and peer evaluation on the functioning and effectiveness of self-managed teams: A quasi-experiment. Personnel Psychology, 55,4, 929-948

Forman, J. & Katsky, P. (1986)The group report: A problem in small group or writing processes? The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 23,4, 23-35

Ginsberg, M. B & Wlodkowski, R. J. (2009) Diversity and motivation: Culturally responsive teaching in college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Griesel, H. & Parker, B. (2009) Graduate attributes. A baseline study on South African graduates from the perspective of employers. Pretoria: Higher Education South Africa / South African Qualifications Authority

Hansen, R. S. (2006) Benefits and problems with student teams: Suggestions for improving team projects. Journal of Education for Business, 82,1, 11-19

Hernandez, S. A. (2002) Team learning in a marketing principles course: Cooperative structures that facilitate active learning and higher level thinking. Journal of Marketing Education, 24,1, 73-85

Hershcovis, M. S. & Rafferty, A. E. (2012) Predicting abusive supervision. Contemporary Occupational Health Psychology: Global Perspectives on Research and Practice, 2, 92-108

Hogan, D.M. and Tudge, J.R.H. (1999) Implications of Vygotsky’s theory for peer learning. in A.M. O’Donnel. and A. King (Eds.) Cognitive Perspective on Peer Learning, Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah

Huff, L. C., Cooper, J. & Jones, W. (2002) The development and consequences of trust in student project groups. Journal of Marketing Education, 24,1, 24-34

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2000)Cooperative learning, values, and culturally plural classrooms. Classroom issues: Practice, pedagogy and curriculum, 15-28

McCain, B. (1996) Multicultural team learning: an approach towards communication competency. Management Decision, 34,6, 65-68

McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2014) Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry, Harlow: Pearson

Merriam, S. B. & Tisdell, E. J. (2015)Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons

NACE (National Association of Colleges and Employers). (2016)Job Outlook 2016: Attributes employers want to see on new college graduates’ resumes. NACE Center for Career Development and Talent Acquisition. [Accessed 28th November 2019at http://www.naceweb.org/s11182015/employers-look-for-in-new-hires.aspx Google Scholar]

Pang, E., Tong, C. & Wong, A. (2011) Key determinants of student satisfaction when undertaking group work. American Journal of Business Education, 4,10, 93

Peterson, S.E. & Miller, J.A. (2004) Comparing the quality of students’ experiences during cooperative learning and large-group instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 97,3, 123-134

Pfaff, E. & Huddleston, P. (2003)Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25,1, 37-45

Riebe, L. & Jackson, D. (2014)The use of rubrics in benchmarking and assessing employability skills. Journal of Management Education, 38, 3, 319-344

Ritter, B. A., Small, E. E., Mortimer, J. W. & Doll, J. L. (2018) Designing management curriculum for workplace readiness: Developing students’ soft skills. Journal of Management Education, 42,1, 80-103

Slavin, R. E. (1990) Research on cooperative learning: Consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership, 47,4, 52-54

Stufflebeam, D.L. and Shinkfield, A.J. (1985) Stufflebeam’s improvement-oriented evaluation. in Systematic evaluation, Springer: Dordrecht (pp. 151-207)

Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P. & Futrell, D. (1990)Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45,2, 120

Sutton, J. C. (1995) The team approach in the quality classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 58,1, 48-50

Teng, C. C. & Luo, Y. P. (2015) Effects of perceived social loafing, social interdependence, and group affective tone on students’ group learning performance. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24,1, 259-269

Underwood, J.D. (2003) Student attitudes towards socially acceptable and unacceptable group working practices. British Journal of Psychology, 94,3, 319-337

Watkins, R. (2004) Groupwork and assessment: The handbook for economics lecturers. Kingston: Kingston University

Wlodkowski, R. J. (2011) Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

Woodside, J.M. (2018) Real-world rigour: An integrative learning approach for industry and higher education. Industry and Higher Education, 32,5, 285–289

Yeatts, D. E. & Hyten, C. (1998) High-performing self-managed work teams: A comparison of theory to practice. California: Sage