Involuntary clients are different

Authors

  • Kay Goler Levin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v16i2.600

Keywords:

<i>involuntary population</i>, <i>engagement</i>, <i>group process</i>, <i>group facilitation with involuntary clients</i>, <i>angry involuntary clients</i>

Abstract

Groupwork has always been interested in empowering individuals to help themselves and others. Within successful therapeutic groups, group process is central to and provides a unique way of helping. Most of the research has been with voluntary populations, and the groups have already been in existence or are naturally formed groups.

Focusing on involuntary clients, my research studied the use of individual relational theories, in conjunction with group engagement theories. Understanding the relational aspects of the group interactive process has provided another way to conceptualize the engagement process with involuntary clients. This paper combines individual and group theories in order to construct a conceptual model for theory building and effective practice with involuntary clients.

It was found that with an involuntary population the group leaders’ acceptance of the anger that group members initially bring to this interaction is especially important. This is the beginning of the engagement process with involuntary clients.

References

Behroozi, C.S. (1992) A model for social work with involuntary applicants in groups. in J. Garland (Ed.) <i>Group Work Reaching Out: People, places and power</i>. Binghampton, NY: Haworth Press (pp.223-238)\nBillow, R.M., (2003) Rebellion in group. <i>International Journal of Group Psychotherapy,</i> 53, 3, 331-351\nBion, W.R. (1961) <i>Experiences in Groups</i>. London: Tavistock Publications\nCowger, C.D. (1979) Conflict and conflict management in working with groups. <i>Social Work with Groups</i>, 2, 309-320\nDe Jong, P., and Berg, I. K. (2001) Co-constructing cooperation with mandated clients. <i>Social Work</i>, 46, 4, 361-374\nFalck, H.S. (1988) <i>Social Work: The membership perspective</i>. New York: Springer\nGans, J.S. (1989) Hostility in group psychotherapy. <i>International Journal of Group Psychotherapy</i> 39, 4, 499-516\nGans, J.S., and Alanso, A. (1998) Difficult patients: Their construction in group therapy. <i>International Journal of Group Psychotherapy,</i> 48, 3, 311-326\nGarland J.A., Jones, H E., and Kolodny, R.L. (1965 and 1973) A model for stages of development in social work groups. in S. Bernstein (Ed.) <i>Explorations in Group Work</i>. Boston: Boston University of Social Work and Milford House (pp. 17-71)\nGarvin, C.D. (1997) <i>Contemporary Group Work</i>. (3rd ed.) Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon\nGoldberg-Wood, G. and Middleman, R.R. (1997) Constructivism, power, and social work with groups. in J. Parry (Ed.) <i>From Prevention to Wellness through Group Work</i>. Binghampton, NY: Haworth Press (pp.1-14)\nHartford, M.E. (1971) <i>Groups in Social Work: Application of small group theory and research to social work practice</i>. New York: Columbia University Press\nIvanoff, A. Blythe, B., and Tripodi, T. (1994) <i>Involuntary Clients in Social Work Practice: A research-based approach</i>. New York: Aldine De Gruyter\nKraus, G. (1997) The psychodynamics of constructive aggression in small groups. <i>Small Group Research,</i> 28, 1, 122-145\nLuria, A. R. (1981) <i>Language and Cognition</i>. New York: John Wiley\nMacgowan, M.J. (2003) Increasing engagement in groups: A measurement based approach. <i>Social Work with Groups</i> 26, 1, 5-28\nMarkus, H.E. and Abernethy, A.D. (2001) Joining with resistance: Addressing reluctance to engage in group therapy training. <i>International Journal of Group Psychotherapy,</i> 51<i>, 2,</i> 191-391\nPam, A. and Kemker, S. (1993) The captive group: Guidelines for group therapists in the inpatient setting. <i>International Journal of Group Psychotherapy,</i> 43, 4, 419-438\nPica, M., Engel, S.D. and Welches, P. (2003) An experiential approach to the inpatient anger management group. <i>International Journal of Group Psychotherapy,</i> 52, 2, 177-200\nPlasse, B.R. (2000) Components of engagement: Women in a psychoeducational parenting skills group in substance abuse treatment. <i>Social Work With Groups,</i> 22, 4, 33-50\nRobbins, R.N. (2003) Developing cohesion in court-mandated group treatment of male spouse abusers. <i>International Journal Of Group Psychotherapy,</i> 53, 3, 261-284\nRooney, R.H. (1992) <i>Strategies for Work with Involuntary Clients</i>. New York: Columbia University Press\nRooney, R.H. and Chovanec, M (2004) Involuntary groups. in C.D. Garvin, L.M. Gutierrez and M.J. Galinsky (Eds.) <i>Handbook of Social Work with Groups</i>. New York: The Guilford Press (pp. 212-226)\nSharry, J. (2001) <i>Solution Focused Groupwork</i>. [Brief Therapies Series] London: Sage\nShulman, L. (1988) Groupwork practice with hard to reach clients: A modality of choice. <i>Groupwork,</i> 1, 1, 5-16.\nStern, D.N. (1985) <i>The Interpersonal World of the Infant</i>. New York: Basic Books\nStolorow, R.D., and Atwood, G. E. (1983) <i>Contexts of Being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life</i>. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press\nThomas, H., and Caplan, T. (1999) Spinning the group process wheel: Effective facilitation techniques for motivating involuntary client groups. <i>Social Work with Groups,</i> 21, 4, 3-21\nTrotter, C. (1999) <i>Working with Involuntary Clients: A guide to practice</i>. London: Sage\nTuttman, S. (1994) Therapeutic responses to the expression of aggression by members in groups. in V.L. Schermer and M. Pines (Eds.) <i>Ring of Fire: Primitive affects and object relations in group psychotherapy</i>. London: Routledge (pp.179-197)\nVygotsky, L.S. (1978) <i>Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes</i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press\nWinnicott, D.W. (1965) <i>The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development</i>. Madison, WI: International Universities Press\n

Downloads

Published

2012-12-20

How to Cite

Levin, K. G. (2012). Involuntary clients are different. Groupwork, 16(2), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v16i2.600

Issue

Section

Articles