Problematic behaviour at work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v18i2.647Keywords:
<i>cognitive-behavioural theory</i>, <i>groupwork</i>, <i>leadership</i>, <i>problematic behaviour at work</i>, <i>teams</i>Abstract
This article sets out to describe a model that, in our role of practice facilitators, we have found to be effective in helping team group leaders to reduce problematic behaviour at work. We illustrate the application of the tools and structures comprising the model with examples and consider the underpinning theory. Our methods, which are informed by cognitive behavioural and groupwork theory, have been developed from working as practitioners with individuals and service users in groups over a 15 year period. These methods form the basis for our current work with team group leaders. The article demonstrates how application of the model empowers team group leaders to use their existing managerial skills, knowledge and experience with confidence. It enables them to address problematic behaviour routinely and proactively rather than going down the costly procedural route. As a consequence, this reduces the amount of their time spent on stressful policy and procedure and enables them and their team groups to work towards achieving the aims of the organisation. The tools and structures are equally relevant to anyone involved in running or participating in groups.
References
Brown, A. (1994) Groupwork. (3rd ed.) Aldershot: AshgatenClark, D. (2002) Leadership Styles Survey http://www.nwlink.com/εdonclark/leader/survstyl.html'>http://www.nwlink.com/εdonclark/leader/survstyl.htmlnChartered Institute of Personnel and Development. (2007) Managing Conflict at Work. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and DevelopmentnDe Bono, E. (1986) CoRT Thinking. Oxford: Pergamon PressnDoel. M. (2004) Difficult Behaviour in Groups. Groupwork, 14, 1, 80-100nDoel, M. (2006) Using Groupwork. Oxford: RoutledgenElwyn, G., Greenhalgh, T. and Macfarlane, F. (2001) Groups. A guide to small groupwork in healthcare, management, education and research. Oxford. Radcliffe Medical PressnHenchman, D. and Walton, S. (1993) Critical incident analysis and its application in groupwork. Groupwork, 6, 3, 189-198nHenchman, D. and Walton, S. (1998) Effective groupwork packages and the importance of process. Groupwork 10, 1, 70-80nHenchman, D. and Walton, S. (2006). In J. Thomas (Ed.) Working with Groups: A study pack. Bristol: University of the West of England (pp.3-15)nJeffers, S. (1987) Feel the Fear. New York: Ballantine BooksnNye. P. (2008) Interview on BBC Radio 4 Today Programme. http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/today'>www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/todaynPayne, M. (2000) Teamwork in Multiprofessional Care. Basingstoke: PalgravenPreston-Shoot, M (2007) Effective Groupwork. (2nd ed.) London: Palgrave. MacmillannRace, P. (1991) Realising human competence in R. Winterburn (Ed.) Realising Human Potential: Aspects of education and training technology. London: Kogan PagenReid, W.J. and Epstein, L. (1972) Task-Centred Casework. New York: Columbia University PressnRoss, R.R., Fabiano, E. and Ross, R.D. (1986) Reasoning and Rehabilitation: Handbook for teaching cognitive skills. Ottawa: University of OttawanSmith, M.K. (2005) Bruce W Tuckman: Forming, storming, norming and performing in groups. http://www.infed.org/thinkers/tuckman.htm.'>www.infed.org/thinkers/tuckman.htm.nThompson, N. (2006) People Problems. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillannTrevithick, P. (2005) Social Work Skills 2nd edition. Maidenhead: Open University PressnTuckman, B.W. (1965) Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 6, 384-399nTuckman, B. and Jensen, M.A.C. (1977) Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organisation Studies. 2, 4, 419.n