Using a prisoner advisory group to develop diversity research in a maximum-security prison

Malcolm Cowburn; Victoria Lavis

doi:10.1921/gpwk.v23i3.767

Authors

Malcolm Cowburn
Victoria Lavis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v23i3.767

Keywords:

appreciative inquiry, action research, research advisory group, prisons, diversity, groupwork, group work

Abstract

This paper addresses groupwork processes with a group of prisoners advising a research project in a maximum-security prison in England. The research project (Appreciative Inquiry into the Diversity Strategy of HMP Wakefield. RES-000-22-3441) was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and lasted 9 months. The research explored the experiences of prisoners in diverse minority groupings and the strategies of the prison to accommodate the complex needs of these groups. The Prisoner Advisory Group (PAG) was made up of representatives from Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) prisoners; older prisoners (over 60s); Disabled prisoners (with physical disabilities, learning difficulties; and mental health problems); Gay, Bi-sexual and Transgender prisoners; and prisoners affiliated to Faith groups. It met regularly during the research. The paper considers the forming norming and performing aspects of establishing an effective participant voice in a prison-based project. It considers the contribution of the PAG to developing a research strategy that engaged prisoners in the research. It reflects on the nature of ‘participative research’ in general and whether such research is possible within a high-security prison environment.

References

Banks, S. (2006) Ethics and Values in Social Work, 3rd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan\nBecker, H. (1967) Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems, 14, 3, 234-247\nBrown, A. and Caddick, B. (Eds.) (1993) Groupwork with Offenders. London: Whiting & Birch\nFine, M., Torre, M. E., Boudin, K., Bowen, I., Clark, J., Hylton, D. et al. (2004) Participatory Action Research: From Within and Beyond Prison Bars. in L. Weis & M. Fine (Eds.) Working Method: Research and Social Justice. New York & Abingdon: Routledge (pp. 95-120)\nGottesdiener, E. (2002) Requirements by Collaboration: Workshops for defining Needs. Boston, San Francisco: Addison-Wesley\nHudson, B. (2007) Diversity, Crime, and Criminal Justice. in M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press (pp. 158-175)\nLiebling, A. (2001) Whose side are we on? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prisons Research. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 472-484\nLiebling, A. & Arnold, H. (2005) Prisons and their Moral Performance: A study of Values, Quality and Prison Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press\nLiebling, A., Elliott, C. & Arnold, H. (2001) Transforming Prison: Romantic Optimism or Appreciative Realism? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 1, 2, 161-180\nLiebling, A., Price, D. & Elliott, C. (1999) Appreciative inquiry and relationships in prison. Punishment & Society, 1, 1, 71-98\nMartinson, R. (1974) What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 23, 22-54\nPriestley, P. and McGuire, J. (1978) Social Skills and Personal Problem Solving. London: Tavistock\nPriestley, P. and McGuire, J. (1983) Learning to Help: Basic Skills Exercises. London: Tavistock\nReed, J. (2007) Appreciative Inquiry. London: Sage\nSalter, A. (1992) Epidemiology of child sexual abuse. in W. O’Donohue and J. Geer (Eds.) The Sexual Abuse of Children: Theory and Research Volume 1. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (pp.108-138)\n