Reversing the roles

Authors

  • Claire Bellamy
  • Aileen Watson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v23i3.768

Keywords:

Circles of Support and Accountability, sex offenders, social isolation, criminal justice groupwork, volunteers, group work

Abstract

Groupwork in a criminal justice setting has traditionally taken the form of a group of offenders undertaking a programme of structured work facilitated by (usually two) professionals. Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) represent a departure from this traditional model. The COSA model uses a group of volunteers to form a ‘Circle’ around an offender who is viewed as being very much part of the group. The approach is currently being used in the UK as part of the risk management process for convicted sex offenders who are experiencing social isolation, a factor that has been linked to the risk of re-offending. The goal of our research was to understand the COSA group process and this article presents a study of a relatively new and different approach to groupwork within criminal justice. We looked at the expectations and opinions of both core group members and volunteers to make some assessment of how this non- traditional form of groupwork operates. The research presented an almost entirely positive picture of COSA from the perspective of both the volunteers and the core group members. All Core members (and we acknowledge that the research focus is a small group of male offenders) felt that the group experience offered them support and a sense of belonging that had previously been missing in their lives.

References

Bates, A., McRae, R., Williams, D. and Webb, C. (2012) Ever-increasing circles: A descriptive study of Hampshire and Thames Valley Circles of Support and Accountability. <i>Journal of Sexual Aggression</i>, 18, 3 page numbers?\nBrown, A. (1994) <i>Groupwork (3</i><sup>rd</sup><i>ed.)</i> Aldershot: Ashgate\nBrown, S. (2010) An introduction to sex offender treatment programmes and their risk reduction efficacy. in K. Harrison (Ed.) <i>Managing High-Risk Sex Offenders in the Community: Risk management, treatment and social responsibility</i>. Cullompton, Devon: Willan page numbers?\nCarich, M.S., Wilson, C., Carich, P.A. and Calder, M.C. (2010) Contemporary sex offender treatment: incorporating circles of support and the good lives model. in J. Brayford, F. Cowe and J. Deering (Eds.) <i>What Else Works: Creative work with offenders</i>. Cullompton, Devon: Willan page numbers?\nDoel, M. (2006) <i>Using Groupwork</i>. Oxford: Routledge/Community Care\nDoel, M. and Sawdon, C. (1999) <i>The Essential Groupworker. Teaching and Learning Creative Groupwork.</i> London: Jessica Kingsley\nHanvey, S., Philpot, T. and Wilson, C. (2011) <i>A Community Based Approach to The Reduction of Sexual Offending: Circles of Support and Accountability</i> London: Jessica Kingsley\nKemshall, H. (2008) <i>Understanding the Community Management of High Risk Offenders.</i> Maidenhead: Open University Press\nKoprowska, J. (2007) <i>Communication and Interpersonal Skills In Social Work</i>. Exeter, Devon: Learning Matters\nLindsay, T. and Orton, S. (2011) <i>Groupwork Practice in Social Work</i> (2<sup>nd</sup><i>ed.)</i> Exeter, Devon: Learning Matters Transforming Social Work Practice series.\nMaruna, S. (1998) <i>Desistance and Development: The Psychosocial Process of ‘going straight’</i>, British Criminology Conferences: Selected Proceedings, Vol. 2. Papers from the British Criminology Conference, Queens University, Belfast, 15-19 July 1997, pp1-19\nMaruna, S., Porter, L. and Carvalho, I. (2004) The Liverpool Desistance Study and probation practice: Opening the dialogue. <i>Probation Journal</i>, 51, 3, 221-232\nMcNeill, F. (2004) Supporting desistance in probation practice: A response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho. <i>Probation Journal</i>, 51, 3, 241-247\nMinistry of Justice (2012) <i>Offender Behaviour Programmes</i> [ Accessed 30 January 2013 at <a target="_blank" href='http://www.justice.gov.uk/offenders/before-after-release/obp]'>http://www.justice.gov.uk/offenders/before-after-release/obp]</a>\nNash, M. (2006) <i>Public Protection and the Criminal Justice Process</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press\nSeabury, B.A., Seabury, B. and Garvin, C. (2011) <i>Foundations of Interpersonal Practice in Social Work</i>. London: Sage\nSilverman, J. and Wilson, D. (2002) <i>Innocence Betrayed: Paedophilia, the Media and Society</i>. Cambridge: Polity\nStepney, P. and Ford, D. (2012) <i>Social Work Models, Methods and Theories</i>. Lyme Regis, Dorset: Russell House Publishing\nWilson, R.J., Picheca, J.E. and Prinzo, M. (2007) Evaluating the Effectiveness of Professionally-Facilitated Volunteerism in the Community-Based Management of High-Risk Sexual Offenders: Part One – Effects of Participants and Stakeholders. <i>The Howard Journal</i>, 46, 3, 289-302\nWilson, R.J., Cortoni, F. and McWhinnie, A.J. (2009) Circles of Support and accountability: A Canadian National Replication of Outcome Findings. <i>Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment</i>, 21, 4, 412-430\n

Published

2013-11-15

How to Cite

Bellamy, C., & Watson, A. (2013). Reversing the roles. Groupwork, 23(3), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v23i3.768

Issue

Section

Articles