Use of social media by self-help and mutual aid groups

Authors

  • Melanie Boyce
  • Patience Seebohm
  • Sarah Chaudhary
  • Carol Munn-Giddings
  • Mark Avis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v24i2.784

Keywords:

<i>self-help groups</i>, <i>mutual aid groups</i>, <i>social media</i>, <i>peer support</i>, <i>online groups</i>, <i>groupwork</i>, <i>group work</i>

Abstract

This paper explores the use of social media by self-help/mutual aid groups that meet on a regular face-to-face basis. It draws on data from the ESTEEM project, which ran from 2010 to 2013 with the overall aim of developing a range of resources for health and social care practitioners on how to support self-help/mutual aid groups. A re-examination of the interviews and discussions that were undertaken with 21 groups in two UK sites indicated that groups’ use of social media was becoming an increasingly important resource. The findings highlight a range of benefits and limitations with selfhelp/mutual aid groups using social media and suggest a blurring of boundaries between online and face-to-face groups. For groupworkers involved with self-help/mutual aid groups opportunities in developing groups’ online presence are raised.

References

Adamsen, L. and Rasmussen, M. (2001) Sociological Perspectives on Self Help Groups: Reflections on Conceptualisation and Social Processes. <i>Journal of Advanced Nursing</i>, 35, 6, 909–917\nAglen, B., Hedlund, M. and Landstad, B.J. (2011) Self-help and self-help groups for people with long-lasting health problems or mental health difficulties in a Nordic context: A review. <i>Scandinavian Journal of Public Health</i>, 39, 813-822\nBorkman, T. (1999) <i>Understanding Self Help / Mutual Aid: Experiential Learning in the Commons</i>. New Jersey: Rutgers\nBraun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. <i>Qualitative Research in Psychology</i>, 3, 77-101\nBoyd, D.M. and Ellison, N.B. (2008) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. <i>Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication</i>, 13,1, 210-230\nBrown, A. (1994) <i>Groupwork.</i> 3rd edition. Aldershot: Ashgate\nChaudhary, S., Avis, M. and Munn-Giddings, C. (2010) The lifespan and life-cycle of self help groups: A retrospective study of groups in Nottingham, UK. <i>Health and Social Care in the Community</i>, 18, 4, 346-354\nCorrea, T., Hinsley, A.W. and Zuniga, H.G. (2010) Who interacts on the web? : The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. <i>Computer in Human Behaviour</i>, 26, 247-253\nDobransky, K. and Hargittai, E. (2006) The disability divide in internet access and use. <i>Information, Communication and Society</i>, 9, 3, 313-334\nDouglas, T. (1993) <i>A Theory of Groupwork Practice.</i> London: Macmillan\nElsdon, K., Reynolds, J. and Stewart, S. (2000) <i>Sharing Experience, Living and Learning: A Study of Self Help Groups</i>. London: Community Matters\nESTEEM (2013) Effective support for self- help/mutual aid groups (ESTEEM): Stage 2 Final Report. [Accessed 6 April 2013 <a target="_blank" href='http://www.selfhelp.org.uk/research'>http://www.selfhelp.org.uk/research</a>\nFinn, J. (1999) An exploration of helping process in an online self-help group focusing on issues of disability. <i>Health and Social Work</i>, 24, 3, 220-231\nFisher, J. (2012) Who gives a tweet: Assessing patients’ interest in the use of social media for health care. <i>Worldviews in Evidence Based Nursing</i>, 2, 100-108\nGray, R., Fitch, M., Davis, C. and Phillips, C. (1997) A qualitative study of breast cancer self help groups. <i>Psycho-Oncology</i>, 6, 279 – 289\nGrieve, R., Indian, M., Witteveen, K., Tolan, G.A. and Marrington, J. (2013) Face-to-Face or Facebook: Can social connectedness be derived online? <i>Computers in Human Behaviour</i>, 29, 604-609\nHelsper, E.J. (2011) <i>The emergence of a digital underclass. Digital policies in the UK and evidence for inclusion.</i> Media Policy brief 3, Digital Inclusion Dossier. LSE Media Policy Project, July. [Accessed 13 March 2013 at http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2011/07/26/digital-underclass-emerges-in-the-uk/] <a target="_blank" href='http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2011/07/26/digital-underclass-emerges-in-the-uk/'>http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2011/07/26/digital-underclass-emerges-in-the-uk/</a>\nKing, S.A. and Moreggi, D. (2006) Internet self-help and support groups: The pros and cons of text-based mutual aid. in J. Gackenback (Ed.) <i>Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal and transpersonal implications.</i> (2nd ed.). London: Elsevier. (pp. 221-244)\nLevine, J. (2005) An exploration of female social work students’ participation in online and face-to-face self-help groups. <i>Groupwork</i>, 15, 2, 61-79\nMadara, E. J. (1997) The mutual-aid self-help online revolution. <i>Social Policy</i>, 27, 3, 20-26\nMadden, S. (2011) The parent to parent group. <i>Groupwork</i>, 21, 2, 35-49\nMunn-Giddings, C. and Borkman, T. (2005) Self-help/mutual aid as a psychosocial phenomenon. in S. Ramon and J.E. Williams (Eds.) <i>Mental Health at the Crossroads</i>: <i>The promise of the psychosocial approach</i>. Aldershot: Ashgate (pp137-155)\nMunn-Giddings, C. and McVicar, A. (2006) Self-help groups as mutual support: What do carers value? <i>Health and Social Care in the Community</i>, 15, 1, 26–34\nMurthy, D. (2012) Towards a sociological understanding of social media: Theorizing Twitter. <i>Sociology</i>, 46, 6, 1059-1073\nPistrang, N., Barker, C. and Humphreys, K. (2008) Mutual Help Groups for Mental Health Problems: A Review of Effectiveness Studies. <i>American Journal of Community Psychology</i>, 42, 110 – 121\nSeebohm, P., Chaudhary, S., Boyce, M., Elkan, R., Avis, M. and Munn-Giddings, C. (2013) The contribution of self-help/mutual aid groups to mental well-being. <i>Health and Social Care in the Community</i>, 21, 4, 3910401, DOI: 10.1111/ hsc.12021\nSeil, D. (2012) Harness social media, enhance your practice. <i>Social Media</i>, July, 40-46\nSelwyn, N. (2004) Reconsider political and popular understandings of the digital divide. <i>New Media and Society</i>, 6, 3, 341-362ov\nShepherd, M.D., Schoenberg, M., Slavich, S., Wituk, S., Warren, M. and Meissen, G. (1999) Continuum of professional involvement in self-help groups. <i>Journal of Community Psychology</i>, 27, 1, 39-53\nSimon, S.R. and Stauber, K.W. (2011) Technology and groupwork: A mandate and an opportunity. <i>Groupwork</i>, 21, 3, 7-21\nSourbati, M. (2009) ‘It could be useful, but not for me at the moment’: Older people, internet access and e-public service provision. <i>New Media and Society</i>, 11, 7, 1083-1100\nSourbati, M. (2012) Disabling communications? A capabilities perspective on media access, social inclusion and communication policy. <i>Media Culture and Society</i>, 34, 5, 571-587\nWilson J. (1994) <i>Two Worlds: Self Help Groups and Professionals.</i> London: Venture Press\nWinter, R. and Munn-Giddings, C. (2001) <i>A handbook for action researchers in health and social care</i>. London: Routledge\nWituk, S., Shepherd, M., Warren, M. and Meissen, G. (2002) Factors Contributing to the Survival of Self Help Groups. <i>American Journal of Community Psychology</i>, 30, 3, 349–366\n

Downloads

Published

2014-11-25

How to Cite

Boyce, M., Seebohm, P., Chaudhary, S., Munn-Giddings, C., & Avis, M. (2014). Use of social media by self-help and mutual aid groups. Groupwork, 24(2), 26-44. https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v24i2.784

Issue

Section

Articles