To what extent are people with intellectual disabilities (ID) active partners in focus group research? A literature review

Rosa Wright

doi:10.1921/gpwk.v26i1.982

Authors

Rosa Wright University of Salford

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v26i1.982

Abstract

Abstract: Zarb’s (1992) criteria were used to inspect the emancipatory potential met in six pieces of focus group research and the level of collaboration and inclusion for people with ID as ‘active partners’ in research. Selected post-2010 research was sourced from a search of online databases pertinent to nursing, social work and ID. The exercise found that control mostly lies in the hands of academics and clinicians. Research is carried out with people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities while those with more complex needs are excluded. Power relationships are not closely examined. It is possible to involve people with ID in research using adapted methods and disabled researchers. Firstly, the idea of power and control for active involvement of participants with ID in focus groups is examined. Then recent research is explored through comparative analysis and a discussion. The author concludes that researchers should account more fully for their own positions of power in the medical or social model of disability. Researchers should offer opportunities for criticism and account for the products of research. Turning abstract concepts into concrete examples may benefit participants with intellectual disabilities.

Keywords: focus groups; intellectual disabilities; disability research; groupwork; group work

Author Biography

Rosa Wright, University of Salford

Newly registered Learning Disability Nurse

References

Andrews, A. & Rose, J.L. (2010) A preliminary investigation of factors affecting employment motivation in people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7, 4, 239-244

Anslow, K. (2013) Systemic family therapy using the reflecting team: the experiences of adults with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 236-243

Barnes, C. (2001) ‘Emancipatory’ Disability Research: project or process? Public Lecture at City Chambers, Glasgow, on 24 October 2001. [Accessed 1 February 2016 at http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Barnes-glasgow-lecture.pdf]

Bigby, C., Frawley, P. & Ramcharan, P. (2014) Conceptualizing Inclusive Research with People with Intellectual Disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27, 3–12

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, 77-101

Brown, L. & Boardman, F. K. (2011) Accessing the field: Disability and the research process. Social Science and Medicine, 72, 23-30

Cambridge, P. & McCarthy, M. (2001) User focus groups and Best Value in services for people with learning disabilities. Health and Social Care in the Community, 9, 6, 476–489

Deal, M. (2003) Disabled people’s attitudes toward other impairment groups: a hierarchy of impairments. Disability & Society, 18, 7, 897-910

Department of Health (2001) Valuing People: A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. London: Department of Health

Department of Health (2005) Mental Capacity Act. London, HMSO

Department of Health (2009) Valuing People Now: A new three year strategy for people with learning disabilities. London: Department of Health

Faulkner, A. (2012) The Right to Take Risks. :ervice users’ views of risk in adult social care. JRF Programme Paper: Risk, trust and relationships in an ageing society. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation

Forrester-Jones, R. (2013) The road barely taken: funerals and people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 243-256

Fraser, M. & Fraser, A. (2001) Are people with learning disabilities able to contribute to focus groups on health promotion? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33, 2, 225-233

Gates, B. & Waight, M. (2007) Reﬂections on conducting focus groups with people with learning disabilities: Theoretical and practical issues. Journal of Research in Nursing, 12, 2, 111–126

Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter

Haynes, K. (2012) Reflexivity in Qualitative Research in G. Symon and C. Cassell (Eds.) Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods and Current Challenges. London: Sage (pp.72-89)

Kaehne, A. & O’Connell, C. (2010) Focus Groups with People with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 14, 2, 133-145

Llewellyn, P. (2009) Supporting people with intellectual disabilities to take part in focus groups: reflections on a research project, Disability & Society, 24, 7, 845-856

Loja, E., Costa, M.E., Hughes, B. & Menezes, I. (2013) Disability, embodiment and ableism: stories of resistance. Disability & Society, 28, 2 190-203

Lupton, D. (1999) Risk. London: Routledge

Mander, C. (2015) First hand experiences of accessible information. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 20, 2, 80-87

Mencap.(undated). Involve Me: Practical Guide. [Accessed 1 Feb 2015 at https://www.mencap.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Involve%20Me%20practical%20guide_full%20version.pdf ]

.Newman, E. & Kaloupek, D. E. (2004) The risks and benefits of participating in Trauma-Focused Research Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 5, 383-394

NHS England (2014) Making Health and Social Care Information Accessible, Consultation Document. London: NHS England

O’Brien, A & Rose, J. (2010) Improving mental health services for people with intellectual disabilities: service users’ views. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 4, 4, 40 – 47

Pillow, W. (2003) Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 2, 175-196

Ritchie, J. and Spencer, L. (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research, in A. Bryman and R.G. Burgess (Eds) Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge (pp.173-94)

Tilly, L. and ‘Money, Friends and Making Ends Meet’ Research Group (2015) Being researchers for the first time: reflections on the development of an inclusive research group. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 121–127

Tracy, S.J. (2012) Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons

Tregaskis, C. and Goodley, D. (2005) Disability research by disabled and non-disabled people: towards a relational methodology of research production. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 5, 363-374

Tuckman, B. (2001) Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Group Facilitation: A Research and Applications Journal, 3, Spring. [Accessed 1 Feb 2015 at http://openvce.net/sites/default/files/Tuckman1965DevelopmentalSequence.pdf ]

Tuffrey-Wijne, I. (2012) A new model for breaking bad news to people with learning disabilities. Palliative Medicine, 27,1, 5-12

Walmsley, J. (1997) Including People with Learning Difficulties: Theory and Practice. in L. Barton and M. Oliver (Eds.)Disability Studies: Past Present and Future. Leeds: The Disability Press (pp. 62 – 77)

Zarb, G. (1992) On the Road to Damascus: first steps towards changing the relations of disability research production. Disability and Society, 7, 2, 125-138