Improving professionalism through reflection and discourse in communities of practice: The key situations in social work model and project

Authors

  • Adi Staempfli Goldsmith College, University of London
  • Eva Tov School of Social Work, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Northwestern Switzerland and School of Applied Psychology, Zurich University of Applied Sciences
  • Regula Kunz School of Social Work, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Northwestern Switzerland
  • Domink Tschopp School of Social Work, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Northwestern Switzerland
  • Stefan Eugster Stamm University of Applied Sciences and Arts, NW Switzerland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v14i2.940

Abstract

Professional social work under conditions of uncertainty and complexity requires integration of various forms of knowledge, practice and values and entails managing emotions skilfully to make ethical professional judgements. The article discusses these challenges for social work(ers) and introduces the key situation in social work model. It consists of a systematic reflection process of typical, reoccurring practice situations in communities of practice (CoPs). Situated knowledge, memorised in relation to situations is dominant and is more easily accessed in practice. Situational knowledge, co-produced in reflections on key situations, is documented and shared on a virtual platform. Therefore, the model offers a concept for situational knowledge management and for discursive examination in professional and scientific communities. In the #keysituation project a platform was constructed and 10 CoPs with 35 active members from practice and academia quality assure its content. Based on the literature nine design principles for CoPs are suggested. The authors describe how these were applied. Success and failure depends on balancing three constituent aspects of CoPs: domain, community and practice. The model offers a flexible approach to continuous professional development (CPD), which fosters a learning culture essential to overcome managerial, technocratic approaches so prevalent in social work organisations.

Author Biographies

Adi Staempfli, Goldsmith College, University of London

Lecturer in Social Work

Eva Tov, School of Social Work, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Northwestern Switzerland and School of Applied Psychology, Zurich University of Applied Sciences

Freelance academic and Associate Lecturer

Regula Kunz, School of Social Work, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Northwestern Switzerland

Lecturer and Head of BA in Sozialer Arbeit

Domink Tschopp, School of Social Work, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Northwestern Switzerland

Research associate e-learning

Stefan Eugster Stamm, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, NW Switzerland

Manager, social psychiatric rehabilitation centre / Associate Lecturer, School of Social Work

References

Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 2, 132–169

Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7, 1, 64-77

Bettoni, M., Clases, C., & Wehner, T. (2004). Communities of Practice im Wissensmanagement: Charakteristika, Initiierung und Gestaltung. In G. Reinmann-Rothmeier & H. Mandl (Eds., Psychologie des Wissensmanagements. Perspektiven, Theorien und Methoden (pp. 319-328). Göttingen: Hogrefe

Brown, John Seely & Duguid, Paul (2000) The Social Life of Information. Boston MA: Harvard Business Review Press

Dewe, B. (2012). Akademische Ausbildung in der Sozialen Arbeit-Vermittlung von Theorie und Praxis oder Relationierung von Wissen und Können im Spektrum von Wissenschaft, Organisation und Profession. In S. B. Roland Becker-Lenz, Gudrun Ehlert & S. Müller-Hermann (Eds., Professionalität Sozialer Arbeit und Hochschule. Wissen, Kompetenz, Habitus und Identität im Studium Sozialer Arbeit (pp. 111-128). Wiesbaden: Springer VS

Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1982). Mind over machine. New York:Free Press

Hennessy, Catherine; Anderson, Sarah; Cornes, Michelle & Manthorpe, Jill (2013). Toolkit: Developing a Community of Practice. Using Communities of practice to improve front line collaborative responses to multiple needs and exclusions. London: Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King’s College London and Revolving Doors Agency

Jang, K. (2013). An Understanding of Optimal Knowledge Management for Social Work Practice: Based on a Process-Oriented Conceptualisation of Knowledge Integration. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 7, 1364–1383. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs053

Kunz, R. (2015). Wissen und Handeln in Schlüsselsituationen der Sozialen Arbeit. Empirische und theoretische Grundlegung eines neuen kasuistischen Ansatzes. [Knowing and Doing in key situations in social work. Empirical and theoretical groundwork of a new casuistic approach] (doctoral thesis). http://www.regulakunz.ch/

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press

Moch, M. (2006). Wissen-Verstehen-Können: Kompetenzerwerb durch reflexive Praxisanleitung im Studium der Sozialen Arbeit. Neue Praxis, 36, 5, 532-544

Munro, E. (2011). The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report. A child-centered system. London: Dept of Education

North, K., Franz, M., & Lembke, G. (2004). Wissenserzeugung und -austausch in Wissensgemeinschaften – Communities of Practice. Berlin: QUEM

Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26, 335-347

Reinmann-Rothmeier, G. (2001). Wissen managen: Das Münchener Modell. Munich: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Lehrstuhl für Empirische Pädagogik und Pädagogische Psychologie

Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith

Social Work Reform Board (SWRB) (2011) Implementing SWRB proposals to improve the provision of social work degree programmes. Final statement on social work education. London: SWRB

Stämpfli, A., Kunz, R., & Tov, E. (2012). Creating a bridge between theory and practice: working with key situations. European Journal of Social Education, 22/23, 60-78

Stämpfli, Adi; Kunz, Regula & Tov, Eva (2014) Schlüsselsituationen der Sozialen Arbeit als Scharnier zwischen Theorie, Wissenschaft und Praxis. In: Oestreicher, Elke & Unterkoffler, Ursula (eds.). Wissensentwicklung in Professionen. Herausforderungen für Wissenschaft und Praxis. Leverkusen-Opladen: Budrich Uni-Press

Tov, Eva; Kunz, Regula; Stämpfli, Adi; Tschopp, Dominik & Eugster Stamm, Stefan (2015). Creating a Common Language between Academics and Practitioners through Negotiation of Meaning in Communities of Practice (CoPs). In: Sharma, Subhash & Zirkler, Michael (Eds.). From the edge of Chaos: Dialogues amongst social theory and practice. International Dialogs amongst research and practice. Bengaluru: IBA Publications, 92-102

Tov, E., Kunz, R., & Stämpfli, A. (2013). Schlüsselsituationen der Sozialen Arbeit. Professionalität durch Wissen, Reflexion und Diskurs in Communities of Practice. Bern: hep

Tov, E., Kunz, R., & Stämpfli, A. (2016). Schlüsselsituationen der Sozialen Arbeit. Professionalität durch Wissen, Reflexion und Diskurs in Communities of Practice. Second, revised edition. Bern: hep

Von Spiegel, H. (2008). Methodisches Handeln in der Sozialen Arbeit. München: Reinhardt

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press

Wenger, E. (2004). Knowledge management as a doughnut: Shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice. Ivy Business Journal, January/February

Published

2016-12-13

How to Cite

Staempfli, A., Tov, E., Kunz, R., Tschopp, D., & Eugster Stamm, S. (2016). Improving professionalism through reflection and discourse in communities of practice: The key situations in social work model and project. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 6-26. https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v14i2.940

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2016-09-29
Accepted 2016-09-29
Published 2016-12-13