Groupwork researchers as ‘temporary insiders’

Authors

  • Mark Doel
  • Kim Orchard

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v16i3.603

Keywords:

groupwork, participant observation, parenting groups, group evaluation, group work evidence base, groupwork research<i>n</i>

Abstract

This paper aims to build the evidence base for groupwork through an exploration of the potential for participant observation in groups. The value of the participant observation method is considered by presenting the available literature and by analysing its use with a particular group. The group used as a case example is one for parents and carers experiencing difficulties with the behaviour of their adolescent children, and it illustrates both the dilemmas and the opportunities of participant observation. This group’s structure is described in detail to provide the backcloth against which the observation took place and to link the process of participant evaluation with the specific detail of the group programme.

The paper develops a variant of the notion of the participant observer, in this case as an active temporary insider in the group, in which the process of independent evaluation by a person external to the group inevitably becomes part of the group process itself. There is discussion of how best to use this characteristic of participant observation, concluding with some guidelines emerging from the research. The guidance is intended to aid temporary insiders to provide independent evaluation and to build the evidence base. The paper is a collaboration between a groupwork academic and a groupwork practitioner.

References

Alston, M. and Bowles, W. (2003) <i>Research for Social Workers: An introduction to methods</i>. London: Routledge\nBurgess, R.G. (1984) <i>In the Field: An introduction to field research</i>. London: George Allen and Unwin\nClarke, A. with Dawson, R. (1999) <i>Evaluation Research</i>. London: Sage\nDelbecq, A.L. and Van de Ven, A.H. (1971) A group process model for problem identification and program planning. <i>Journal of Applied Behavioural Science</i>, 7, 4, 466-492\nDoel, M. (2006) <i>Using Groupwork</i>. London: Routledge/Community Care\nGold, R.L. (1969) <i>Issues in Participant Observation</i>, Reading: Addison-Wesley\nGrinnell, R.M. (Ed.) (1993) <i>Social Work Research and Evaluation</i>. [3rd ed] Itasca, Ill: Peacock\nJorgensen, D.L. (1989) <i>Participant Observation: A methodology for human studies</i>. Newbury Park, PA: Sage\nMalekoff, A. (2004) <i>Group Work with Adolescents: Principles and practice</i>. (2nd ed.] New York: Guilford Press\nMcDermott, F. (2005) Researching groupwork: Outsider and insider perspectives. <i>Groupwork</i>, 15, 1, 90-108\nPatton, M.Q. (1990) <i>Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods</i>. [2nd ed.] Newbury Park, CA: Sage\nPotter, M., Gordon, S., and Hamer, P. (2004) The nominal group technique: A useful consensus methodology. <i>NZ Journal of Physiotherapy</i>, 32, 3, 126-30\nPreston-Shoot, M. (2004) Evidence: the final frontier? Star Trek, groupwork and the mission of change. <i>Groupwork</i>, 14, 3, 18-40\nTrevithick, P. (2005) The knowledge base of groupwork and its importance within social work. <i>Groupwork</i>, 15, 2, 80-107\nWheelan, S. A. (2005) <i>The Handbook of Group Research and Practice</i>. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage\nWhyte, W.F. (1955) <i>Street Corner Society</i>. Chicago: Chicago University Press\nWinstein, R.M. (1982) The mental hospital from the patient’s point of view. in Walter R. Gove [Ed.] <i>Deviance and Mental Illness</i>. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage\n

Downloads

Published

2012-12-20

How to Cite

Doel, M., & Orchard, K. (2012). Groupwork researchers as ‘temporary insiders’. Groupwork, 16(3), 46-70. https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v16i3.603

Issue

Section

Articles