Understanding and improving discretionary judgment and decision-making in child protection practice: Towards a whole-of-system policy evaluation

David Hodgson, Lynelle Watts, Donna Chung

Abstract


Discretionary judgment is a necessary and desirable attribute of child protection practice and decision-making. Increasingly, approaches towards accountability in child protection services act to constrain the use of practitioner discretionary judgement through ever increasing layers of standardisation and technical-rational approaches to practice. This situation is at odds with the need for professionals to adaptively respond to practice environments that are characterised by uncertainty and complexity. At the same time, there are known weakness and problems that are reported in the decision-making literature, begging questions about how to best support and evaluate for effective and accountable discretion and decision-making across a whole system. In this paper discretion is conceptualised as a structural and epistemic phenomena that is constrained and restricted under the weight of standardisation. A five-part conceptual framework for a systems approach to policy evaluation is presented, and it is argued that this framework would support the capacity for effective discretionary judgement and decision-making to emerge as a property of the system overall. This paper is a theoretical and conceptual argument for a systemic policy evaluation framework that is supportive of discretionary judgment and decision-making in child protection systems shifting the emphasis away from technical-rational compliance.


Full Text:

 Subscribers Only

References


Altuntas, S. and Baykal, U. (2010) Relationship between nurses’ organizational trust levels and their organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 42, 2, 186-194.

Bartelink, C., van Yperen, T. A. and ten Berge, I. J. (2015) Deciding on child maltreatment: A literature review on methods that improve decision-making. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 7494, 142-153. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.07.002

Benbenishty, R., Davidson-Arad, B., López, M., Devaney, J., Spratt, T., Koopmans, C., . . . Hayes, D. (2015) Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals’ child welfare attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, Special Issue, 63-75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.015

Beresford, P. (2010) Public partnerships, governance and user involvement: A service user perspective. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 5, 495-502.

Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D., White, S. and Pithouse, A. (2010) Risk, instrumentalism and the humane project in social work: Identifying the informal logics of risk management in children's statutory services. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 4, 1046-1064.

Caldwell, F. (2017). Almost one child known to Child Protection dies every week. [accessed March 20, 2018 at http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/almost-one-child-known-to-child-protection-dies-every-week-20170220-gugp9p.html]

De Bortoli, L., Ogloff, J., Coles, J. and Dolan, M. (2017) Towards best practice: Combining evidence-based research, structured assessment and professional judgement. Child & Family Social Work, 22, 2, 660-669.

Evans, T. (2010) Professional Discretion in Welfare Services: Beyond street-level bureaucracy. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Forss, K. and Schwartz, R. (2011) Introduction, In K. Forrs, M. Marra and R. Schwartz (Eds.) Evaluating the Complex: Attribution, contribution and beyond, New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers (pp. 1-31).

General Purpose Standing Committee No. 2. (2017) Child protection. [Accessed March 20, 2018 at https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/committees/DBAssets/InquiryReport/ReportAcrobat/6106/Final%20report%20-%20Child%20protection.pdf]

Gould-Williams, J. (2007) HR practices, organizational climate and employee outcomes: Evaluating social exchange relationships in local government. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, 9, 1627-1647. doi: 10.1080/09585190701570700

Grojean, M. W., Resick, C. J., Dickson, M. W. and Smith, D. B. (2004) Leaders, values, and organizational climate: Examining leadership strategies for establishing an organizational climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 3, 223-241.

Hall, C., Parton, N., Peckover, S. and White, S. (2010) Child-centric Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and the fragmentation of child welfare practice in England. Journal of Social Policy, 39, 3, 393-413.

Healy, K. and Darlington, Y. (2009) Service user participation in diverse child protection contexts: Principles for practice. Child & Family Social Work, 14, 4, 420-430.

Helm, D. and Roesch-Marsh, A. (2016) The ecology of judgement: A model for understanding and improving social work judgements. The British Journal of Social Work, 47, 5, 1361-1376. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcw091

House of Commons. (2016) Child protection: Thirty-first report of session 2016-2017. [Accessed March 20, 2018 at https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmpubacc/713/713.pdf].

Houston, S., Spratt, T. and Devaney, J. (2011) Mandated prevention in child welfare: Considerations from a framework shaping ethical inquiry. Journal of Social Work, 11, 3, 287-305. doi: 10.1177/1468017310378886

Hughes, M. (2016) Ethics in organizations’, In R. Hugman and J. Carter (Eds.) Rethinking Ethics and Values in Social Work. London, England: Palgrave (pp. 180-194).

Jessen, J. T. and Tufte, P. A. (2014) Discretionary decision-making in a changing context of activation policies and welfare reforms. Journal of Social Policy, 43, 2, 269-288.

Johnson, S. and Petrie, S. (2004) Child protection and risk-management: The death of Victoria Climbie. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 2, 179-202.

Kuijvenhoven, T. and Kortleven, W. J. (2010) Inquiries into fatal child abuse in the Netherlands: A source of improvement? British Journal of Social Work, 40, 4, 1152-1173.

Larrick, R. P. (2016) The social context of decisions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 1, 441-467.

Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

McArthur, M. and Thomson, L. (2012) National analysis of workforce trends in statutory child protection [Accessed March 20, 2018 at https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/11_2012/national_statutory_child_protection_analysis_oct_4.pdf]

Molander, A., Grimen, H. and Eriksen, E. O. (2012) Professional discretion and accountability in the welfare state. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 29, 3, 214-230. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2012.00564.x

Moore, M. (2007). Recognising public value: The challenge of measuring performance in government, in J. Wanna (Ed.) A Passion for Policy. Canberra, Australia: ANU Press (pp. 91-116).

Munro, E. (1999) Common errors of reasoning in child protection work, Child Abuse & Neglect. 23, 8, 745-758. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00053-8

Munro, E. (2009) Managing societal and institutional risk in child protection. Risk Analysis, 29, 7, 1015-1023.

Munro, E. (2010a) Learning to reduce risk in child protection. The British Journal of Social Work, 40, 4, 1135-1151. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcq024

Munro, E. (2010b) The Munro review of child protection: Part one: A systems analysis [Accessed March 20, 2018 at http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/11434/1/TheMunroReviewofChildProtection-Part%20one.pdf]

O'Brien, C. (2017) How the Tiahleigh Palmer case prompted an overhaul of Queensland's child protection system [Accessed March 20, 2018 at http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-20/how-tiahleighs-death-is-changing-the-child-protection-system/8286058]

Parton, N. (2012) The Munro Review of child protection: An appraisal. Children & Society, 26, 150-162.

Perkins, M. (2016) Child deaths a haunting testimony to child protection failure. [Accessed March 20, 2018 at http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/child-deaths-a-haunting-testimony-to-child-protection-failure-20161207-gt5zjh.html]

Rogers, P. J. (2011) Implications of complicated and complex characterisitics for key tasks in evaluation’, in K. Forss, M. Marra and R. Schwartz (Eds.) Evaluating the Complex: Attribution, contribution and beyond. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers(pp. 33-52).

Sanders, R., Colton, M. and Roberts, S. (1999) Child abuse fatalities and cases of extreme concern: Lessons from reviews. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 3, 257-268. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00123-9

Shaw, I. and Clayden, J. (2010) Technology, evidence and professional practice: Reflections on the integrated children's system. Journal of Children's Services, 4, 4, 15-27.

Sheppard, M., Newstead, S., Di Caccavo, A. and Ryan, K. (2000) Reflexivity and the development of process knowledge in social work: A classification and empirical study. British Journal of Social Work, 30, 465-488.

Six, F. (2007) Building interpersonal trust within organizations: A relational signalling perspective. Journal of Management and Governance, 11, 3, 285-309. doi: 10.1007/s10997-007-9030-9

Spratt, T., Devaney, J. and Hayes, D. (2015) In and out of home care decisions: The influence of confirmation bias in developing decision supportive reasoning. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 76-85. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.01.015

Taylor, B. J. (2010) Professional Decision Making in Social Work. Exeter, UK: Learning Matters.

Taylor, C. and White, S. (2006) Knowledge and reasoning in social work: Educating for humane judgement. The British Journal of Social Work, 36, 6, 937-954. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bch365

Wallander, L. and Molander, A. (2014) Disentangling professional discretion: A conceptual and methodological approach. Professions & Professionalism, 4, 3, 1-19.

Wastell, D., White, S., Broadhurst, K., Peckover, S. and Pithouse, A. (2010) Children's services in the iron cage of performance management: Street-level bureaucracy and the spectre of Svejkism. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 3, 310-320.

White, S. and Stancombe, J. (2003) Clinical Judgement in the Health and Welfare Professions: Extending the evidence base. Buckingham; Phildelphia: Open University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v20i1.1136

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Social Work and Social Sciences Review