In search of social work's post-risk paradigm

Joe Smeeton

Abstract


This paper describes a paradigmatic shift in child protection practice within the UK, arguing that there is a move away from the risk paradigm but that its replacement is not yet defined. The paper draws upon the critical literature to elucidate this shift and to give examples and arguments for why the risk paradigm is unsustainable and how this has created an essential tension within the profession. While the case against the risk perspective is strongly argued there is not yet a coherent perspective to replace it which is problematic as practitioners are left with a toolkit of technical interventions to guide their practice but what is missing is the capacity to develop an ethic of practice due to a failure of social work in the UK to engage with philosophical questions about its remit. The conclusion is drawn that social work needs to focus more on ethical fluency rather than being stuck on statistical understandings of practice and policy in order to achieve a shift in paradigm from ‘risk’ to ‘ethics’.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aristotle (2009) The Nichomachean Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Audi, R. ed (1999) The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barnes, M. and Prior, D. (Eds) Subversive Citizens. Bristol: Policy Press

Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage

Beck, U. (2007) World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press

Benn, P. (1998) Ethics: Fundamentals of Philosophy. London: UCL Press

Bilson, A. and Martin, K.E.C. (2017) Referrals and child protection in England: one in five children referred to children’s services and one in nineteen investigated before the age of five. In British Journal of Social Work 47, 793-811

Broadhurst, K. Grover, C. and Jamieson, J. (2009) Critical Perspectives on Safeguarding Children. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell

Connolly, M (2017) Beyond the Risk Paradigm in Child Protection. London: Palgrave.

Denney, D. (2005) Risk & Society. London: Sage

Featherstone, B., White, S. and Morris, K. (2014) Re-imagining Child Protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press

Fisher, P. and Freshwater, D. (2015) An emancipatory approach to practice and qualitative inquiry in mental health: finding ‘voice’ in Charles Taylor’s Ethics Of Identity. Ethics and Social Welfare, 9, 1, 2-17, DOI: 10.1080/17496535.2014.884611

France, A. and Utting, D. (2005) The paradigm of ‘risk and protection-focussed prevention’ and its impact on services for children and families. Children & Society, 19, 2, 77-90.

Garrett P-M (2009) Transforming’ Children’s Services: Social work, neoliberalism and the ‘modern’ world. Maidenhead: Open University Press

Goodman, S. and Trowler, I. (Eds.) (2012) Social Work Reclaimed. London: Jessica Kingsley

Gray, M and Webb, S.A. (eds) Ethics and Value Perspectives in Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. (Trans. C. Lenhardt and S.W. Nicholsen) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Halvorsen, T (2018): ‘Philosophy of social work – a new and advantageous field of training and research’. Journal of Social Work Practice, DOI: 10.1080/02650533.2018.1438994

Heidegger, M (1977) The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. (Trans W. Lovitt) New York: Harper & Row

Heidegger, M. (1988) The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press

Herring, J., Probert, R. and Gilmore, S. (2015) Great Debates in Family Law. London: Palgrave

Houston, S. (2010) Discourse Ethics. in M. Gray and S.A. Webb (Edss) Ethics and Value Perspectives in Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Jütte, S., Bentley, H., Tallis, D., Mayes, J., Jetha, N., O’Hagan, O., Brookes, H. and McConnell, N. (2015) How Safe Are Our Children?: The most comprehensive overview of child protection in the UK. London: NSPCC

Keddell, E. and Hyslop, I. (2019) Ethnic inequalities in child welfare: The role of practitioner risk perceptions. Child & Family Social Work. 24, 409-420 DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12620

Kemshall, H. (2010) Risk rationalities in contemporary social work policy and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1247-1262

Krug, E.G., Dahlberg, L.L., Mercy, J.A., Zwi, A.B. and Lorenzo, R. (2002) World Report on Violence and Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation

Kuhn, T.S. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (3rd ed.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Laming, Lord (2009) The Protection of Children in England: A Progress Report. London: The Stationery Office.

Milner, J. and Myers, S. (2007) Working with Violence: Policies and practices in risk assessment and management. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

Morris, K. and Burford, G. (2009) Family Decision-Making: New spaces for resistance and participation. in M. Barnes and D. Prior (Eds.) Subversive Citizens. Bristol: Policy Press

Morris, K. and Burford, G. (2017) Engaging families and managing risk in practice. in M. Connolly (Ed.) Beyond the Risk Paradigm in Child Protection. London: Palgrave (pp. 91-108)

Munro, E. (2010) Learning to reduce risk in child protection.British Journal of Social Work. 40, 1135-1151

Munro, E. (2011) The Munro review of Child Protection. Final Report: A child-centred system. London: Department for Education

Oxford English Dictionaries (2002) Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Parrott, L. (2014) Values and Ethics in Social Work Practice. London: Sage

Parton, N. (2011) Child protection and safeguarding in England: Changing and competing conceptions of risk and their implications for social work. British Journal of Social Work. 41, 854-875

Rothstein, H., Huber, M. and Gaskell, G. (2006) A theory of risk colonization: The spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk. Economy and Society, 35, 91-112. cited in Munro, E. (2010) Learning to reduce risk in child protection. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1135-1151

Shlonsky, A and Mildon, R. (2017) Assessment and decision making to improve outcomes in child protection. in M. Connolly (Ed.) Beyond the Risk Paradigm in Child Protection. London: Palgrave (pp.111-129)

Smeeton, J. (2015) From Aristotle to Arendt: A phenomenological exploration of forms of knowledge and practice in the context of child protection social work in the UK. Qualitative Social Work 16, 1, 14-28 https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325015603479

Smeeton, J. (2018) “A Murky Business’: A phenomenological ontology of risk in child protection social work in the UK. Qualitative Social Work. 0(0) 1–17 https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325018815732

Smith, N.H. (2002) Charles Taylor: Meanings, Morality and Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press

Stanford, S.N. (2011) Constructing moral responses to risk: A framework for hopeful social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1514-1531

Stang, E. (2018) Ethical decision-making in internet research: Investigating protect groups against Child Welfare Services on Facebook. in Qualitative Social Work. 0(0) 1-17 DOI: 10.1177/1473325018796120

Star, The (24.9.10) available at http://www.thestar.co.uk/what-s-on/out-about/case-closed-twice-by-social-services-before-alex-s-death-1-2964612 accessed 28.9.15.

Taylor, C. (1989) Source of the Self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Taylor, C. (1991) The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Turnell, A. and Edwards, S. (1999) Signs of Safety: A solution and safety oriented approach to child protection casework. New York: Norton

Ward, J. & Smeeton, J. (2017) The end of non-consensual adoption: promoting the well-being of children in care. Practice:, 29, 1, 55-73 https://doi.org/10.1080/09503153.2016.1164131

Webb, S.A. (2006) Social Work in a Risk Society: social and political perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v20i3.1334

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Social Work and Social Sciences Review