Identity of clients and social workers in service provision: an institutional logics perspective

Authors

  • Filip Wollter Stockholm University Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v21i3.1340

Abstract

This article illustrates how the theory of institutional logics can be used for analyzing the identity of social workers and clients, focusing on people processing that precedes treatment (control access, assessment, and treatment deliberation, among others). The article has two research questions: (1) What identities of social workers and clients can be distinguished by institutional logics? (2) How are identities intertwined in practice (exemplified by well-established decision-making models such as evidence-based practice, family group conference, and government by voucher)? Identity is examined using institutional logics and the findings reported in the current body of social work literature. The article derives two conclusions. The first conclusion is that institutional logics can be used for distinguishing ideal type identities: three client identities, namely taken care of community member (community logic), active citizen (participatory democracy logic), and consumer (market logic); and three social worker identities, namely professional (professional logic), bureaucrat (State logic), and executor of management directives (corporation logic). The second conclusion is that identities and institutional logics coexist in well-established models for processing people and treatment deliberation, but the conditions for coexistence differ. For instance, evidence-based practice is characterized by segregation (a bureaucratic and a professional alignment have been separated from the original version of EBP), whereas family group conference and government by voucher are typified by assimilation (logics coexist with the core elements of original logics preserved).

 

Keywords: social work, institutional logics, people processing, decision-making

References

Abbott, A. (1988). The System of Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: from service-delivery to co-production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Arnstein, S. (1969). The Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224.

Austin, D. (1983). The Flexner Myth and the History of Social Work. Social Service Review, 57(3), 357-377.

Barnes, M., & Shardlow, P. (1997). From passive recipient to active citizen: Participation in mental health user groups. Journal of Mental Health, 6(3), 289-300.

Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6 ), 1419-1440.

Bellamy, J., Bledsoe, S., Mullen, E., Fang, L., & Manuel, J. (2008). Agency-university partnership for evidence-based practice in social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(3), 55–75.

Bent-Goodley, T. B. (2015). The Art and Science of Social Work Revisited: Relevance for a Changing World. Social Work, 60(3), 189-190.

Bergmark, A., & Lundström, T. (2011). Guided or independent? Social workers, central bureaucracy and evidence-based practice. European Journal of Social Work, 14(3), 323-337.

Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society, 36(6), 547-571. doi:10.1007/s11186-007-9045-x

Blomqvist, P. (2004). The Choice Revolution: Privatization of Swedish Welfare Services in the 1990. Social Policy & Administration, 38(2), 139-155.

Bode, I. (2010). Social Care going Market. Institutional And Cultural Change Regarding Services For The Elderly. J Comp Soc Work, 1, 1 - 15.

Bogo, M., Raphael, D., & Roberts , R. (1993). Interests, activities, and self-identification among social work student: towards a definition of social work identity. Journal of Social Work Education, 29(3), 279-292.

Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review.

Briggs, A. (2014). The welfare state in historical perspective. In C. Pierson, F. G. Castles, & I. K. Nauman (Eds.), The welfare state reader. Bristol: Polity press.

Brunsson, N. (1994). Politicization and 'company-ization' - on institutional affiliation and confusion in the organizational world. Management accounting research, 5, 323-335.

Brunsson, N., & Olsen, J. (1993). The reforming organization. London: Routledge.

Burford, G., & Penell, J. (1998). Family Group Decision making project. Outcome report volume 1. .

Chandler, J., Bell, L., Berg, E., & Barry, J. (2015). Social Work in Movement: Marketisation, Differentiation and Managerial Performativity in Sweden and England. International Journal of Social Work and Human Services Practice, 3(3), 109-117.

Clarke, J. (2013). In Search of Ordinary People: The Problematic Politics of Popular Participation. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(208–226).

Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S., & McLaughlin, E. (2000). New Managerialism, New Welfare? London: Sage.

Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage.

Clarke, J., Newman, J., Smith, N., Vidler, E., & Westmarland, L. (2007). Creating citizen-consumers. Changing publics & changing public services. In J. Clarke (Ed.), London. Sage.

Cohen, N., Benish, A., & Shamriz-Ilouz, A. (2016). When the Clients Can Choose: Dilemmas of Street-Level Workers in Choice-Based Social Services. Social Service Review, 90(4), 620-646. doi:doi:10.1086/689621

Cooper, T., & Gulick, L. (1984). Citizenship and Professionalism in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 44, 143-151.

Daniels, R. J., & Trebilcock, M. J. (2005). Rethinking The Welfare State: Government by voucher. London: Routledge.

Dhawan, N. (2015). Social work for UGC-NET. New Dheli: McGraw Hill Education.

Drisko, J. (2014). Research Evidence and Social Work Practice: The Place of Evidence-Based Practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 42(123), 123–133.

Drisko, J., & Grady, M. (2015). Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: A Contemporary Perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, 43(3), 274-282. doi:10.1007/s10615-015-0548-z

Ellis, K. (2016). Personalisation and adult social work: Recasting professional discretion at the street level? In P. Hupe, M. Hill, & A. Buffat (Eds.), Understanding street-level bureaucracy (pp. 187–202). Bristol: Policy Press.

Engberg, E. (2005). I fattiga omständigheter. Fattigvårdens former och understödstagare i Skellefteå socken under 1800-talet. (Dissertation), Umeå University, Umeå.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity press.

Ewan, F. (2018). Personalisation - An Emergent Institutional Logic in Healthcare? Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”. Int J Health Policy Manag 2018, 7(1), 92–95, 7(1), 92–95.

Forkby, T., Höjer, S., & Liljegren, A. (2014). Questions of control in child protection decision making: Laypersons' monitoring and governance in child protection committees in Sweden. Journal of Social Work, 15(5), 537-557.

Forkby, T., Höjer, S., & Liljegren, A. (2016). Making sense of common sense: examining the decision-making of politically appointed representatives in Swedish child protection. Child & Family Social Work, 21(1), 14-25.

Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: the third logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: Chicago university press.

Gambrill, E. (2011). Evidence-based practice and the ethics of discretion. Journal of Social Work, 11(1), 26–48.

Garrow, E., & Hasenfeld, Y. (2016). When Professional Power Fails: A Power Relations Perspective. Social ServiceReview.

Gibelman, M. (1999). The Search for Identity: Defining Social Work—Past, Present, Future. Social Work, 44(4), 298–310.

Gitterman, A., & Knight, C. (2013). Evidence-Guided Practice: Integrating the Science and Art of Social Work. Families in Society, 94(2), 70-78. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4282

Glynn, M., & Lounsbury, M. (2005). From the Critics’ Corner: Logic Blending, Discursive Change and Authenticity in a Cultural Production System. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1031-1055.

Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of Institutional Logics: Changes in the Professional Work of Pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372-416.

Grady, M., & Keenan, E. (2014). Beyond the Manual: Using Research and Evidence in Social Work Practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 42, 101–106.

Graybeal, C. (2013). The Art of Practicing with Evidence. Clinical Social Work Journal, 42(2), 116-122.

Hannah-Moffat, K. (2001). Punishment in disguise: penal governance and federal imprisonment of women in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Hardcastle, D. A., Wenocur, S., & Powers, P. R. (1997). Community practice: theories and skills for social workers. New York: Oxford University Press.

Harris, J. (2003). The Social Work Business. London: Routledge.

Hasenfeld, Y. (1972). People Processing Organizations: An Exchange Approach. American sociological review, 37(3), 256-263. doi:10.2307/2093466

Healy, K. (2002). Managing human services in a market environment: What role for social workers. British Journal of Social Work, 32(5), 527-540.

Healy, K. (2014). Social work theories in context. Creating frameworks for practice (2 ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hermodsson, A. (1998). Klientdemokrati – vision och verklighet. (Dissertation), Stockholm university, Stockholm.

Hodson, R., & Sullivan, T. A. (2002). The social organization of work (3 ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Hofer, M. (1999). Community Service and Social Cognitive Development in German Adolescents In M. Yates & J. Youniss (Eds.), Roots of Civic Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for alla seasons. Public Administration, 69, 3-19.

Höjer, S., & Forkby, T. (2011). Care for Sale: The Influence of New Public Management in Child Protection in Sweden. British Journal of Social Work, 41(1), 93-110.

Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, . London: Sage.

Larson, M. S. (1977). The Rise of Professionalism. A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lasswell, H. (1988). Politics: Who Gets What, When, and How. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Le Grand, J. (2003). Motivation, Agency and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Levin, C. (2017). Det sociala ansvarets organisering. Social barnavård mellan byråkrati och solidaritet [Organization of social responsibility. Social childcare between bureaucracy and solidarity]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Levine, C. (2008). Citizenship and service delivery. The promise of co-production. In N. Roberts (Ed.), The age of direct citizen participation. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Lupton, C., & Stevens, M. (1998). Planning in partnership? An assessment of process and outcome in UK family group conferences. International journal of child & family welfare, 2, 135-148.

Lymbery, M. (2004). Managerialism and care management practices with older people. In M. Lymbery & S. Butler (Eds.), Social Work Ideals and Practice Realities (pp. 157-178). Basingstoke, UK,: Palgrave Macmillan.

Marshall, T. H. (1950). Class, Citizenship, and Social Development. . New York: Anchor Books.

Meeuwisse, A., & Sunesson, S. (1998). Frivilliga organisationer, socialt arbete och expertis. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift, 5(2-3), 172-193.

Meyer, R., Egger-Peitler, I., Höllerer, M., & Hammerschmid, G. (2014). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 861–885.

Mohr, J. (1994). Soldiers, mothers, tramps and others: Discourse roles in the 1907 New York City charity directory.

Mohr, J., & Duquenne, V. (1997). The Duality of Culture and Practice: Poverty Relief in New York City, 1888-1917. Theory and Society, 26(2/3).

Mohr, J., & Neely, B. (2009). Modeling Foucault: Dualities of power in institutional fields. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 27, 203–255.

Morris, K., & Connolly, M. (2012). Family decision making in child welfare: challenges in developing a knowledge base for practice. Child Abuse Review, 21(1), 41-52. doi:10.1002/car.1143

Mullen, E., & Streiner, D. (2004). The Evidence For and Against Evidence-Based Practice. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4(2), 111-121. doi:10.1093/brief-treatment/mhh009

Munro, E. (2009). Managing Societal and Institutional Risk in Child Protection. Risk Analysis, 29(7).

Murphy, A., & McDonald, J. (2004). Power, status and marginalization: Rural social workers and evidence-based practice in multidisciplinary teams. Australian Social Work, 57(127–136).

Needham, C. (2011). Personalising public services: Understanding the personalisation narrative. Bristol, England: Policy Press.

Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455-476.

Peters, G., & Pierre, J. (2000). Citizens versus the new public manager. The Problem of Mutual Empowerment. Administration & Society, 32(1), 9-28.

Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis - new public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state (3 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Proctor, E., Knudsen, K., Fedoravicius, N., Hovmand, P., Rosen, A., & & Perron, B. (2007). Implementation of evidence-based practice in community behavioral health: Agency director perspectives. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 34, 479–488.

Richmond, M. (1917). Social diagnosis. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.

Rosen, A., & Proctor, E. (2003). Developing practice guidelines for social work interventions: issues, methods and research agenda. New York: Columbia University Press.

Sackett, D., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71-72.

Sallnäs, M., & Wiklund, S. (2018). Socialtjänstmarknaden. Stockholm: Liber.

Savas, E. (2002). Competition and Choice in New York City. Social Services. Public Administration Review, 62(1), 82-91.

Shanks, E. (2016). Managing social work. Organisational conditions and everyday work for managers in the Swedish social services. (Dissertation), Stockholm university, Stockolm. (SSSW33)

Shleifer, A. (1998). State versus private ownership. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4).

Skoglund, A. M. (1992). Fattigvården på den svenska landsbygden år 1829. (Dissertation), Stockholms universitet, Stockholm.

Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G., & Spee, P. (2015). Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 932-970.

Smith, A. (1976). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Vol. 1). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Snell, K. (2006). Parish and belonging: community, identity and welfare in England and Wales, 1700-1950. . Cambridge University Press.

Sundell, K., & Vinnerljung, B. (2004). Outcomes of family group conferencing in Sweden: A 3-year follow-up. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28(3), 267-287.

Svanevie, K. (2011). Evidensbaserat socialt arbete: Från idé till praktik. (PhD), Umeå university,

Swärd, H., & Edebalk, P. G. (2017). Socialt arbete och socialpolitik: - om Centralförbundet för socialt arbete och dess betydelse. Stockholm: Studentlitteratur.

Taylor, C., & White, S. (2006). Knowledge and reasoning in social work: Educating for humane judgement. . British Journal of Social Work, 36(6), 937–954.

Thornton, P. (2004). Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843.

Thornton, P., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective. A new apporach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford university press.

Walkowitz, D. (1990). The Making of a Feminine Professional Identity: Social Workers in the 1920s. The American Historical Review, 95(4), 1051-1075.

van de Luitgaarden, G. (2009). Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: Lessons from Judgment and Decision-Making Theory. British Journal of Social Work, 39(2), 243-260.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, edited by Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. . Berkeley: University of California.

Venkataraman, H., & Vermeulen, P. (2016). Market Meets Community: Institutional Logics as Strategic Resources for Development Work. Organization Studies, 37(5), 709 –733.

Wennemo, I. (2014). Det gemensamma. Om den svenska välfärdsmodellen [The public. About the Swedish welfare model]. Stockholm: Premiss

Published

2020-07-16

How to Cite

Wollter, F. (2020). Identity of clients and social workers in service provision: an institutional logics perspective. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v21i3.1340