The Views of Parents Subject to Child Protection Investigation for their Child or Children with Disabilities: An Exploratory Qualitative Study
Keywords:
child protection and welfare, parent, experiences, views, disability, interviewsAbstract
The views and experiences of parents subject to child protection processes are instrumental for developing rigorous, effective and compassionate child protection practice. Simultaneously, children with disabilities are well established to experience gravely heightened risk of abuse and neglect above their non-disabled peers. Here unique and additional impediments to effectual safeguarding practice for children with disabilities are also documented. Even so, there is virtually no research that focuses on the views and experiences of parents of children with disabilities, who were subject to child protection processes, regarding their parenting of those children. With the safety and welfare of children with disabilities at stake, it is suggested that these parental views are critical to gather and comprehend. This article presents qualitative research findings of a study that conducted semi-structured interviews with a sample of parents of children with disabilities in Britain and Ireland. Parental accounts reveal key dimensions of being subject to child protection processes, such as avoidable experiences of emotional adversity, and critical learning arising from interactions with child protection procedures and systems. The article concludes with evidence-based reflections on the utmost importance of emotionally sensitive, collaborative child protection work with parents.
References
Birmingham City Council (2014) Parent's Experiences of the Child Protection Process and Staff Experiences of Working with Parents: a qualitative study. Birmingham: Birmingham City Council.
Buckley, H. (2003) Child Protection Work: Beyond the rhetoric. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Buckley, H., Skehill, C., and O'Sullivan, E. (1997) Child Protection Practices in Ireland: A
case study. Dublin: Oak Tree Press.
Buckley, H., Whelan, S., Carr, N. and Murphy, C. (2008) Service Users' Perceptions of the
Child Protection System. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
Burr, V. (2015) Social Constructionism. 3rd Edn. East Sussex: Routledge.
Clark, T., Foster, L., Sloan, L. and Bryman, A. (2021) Bryman’s Social Research Methods. 6th Edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Devine, L. and Parker, S. (2015) ESRC Evidence Briefing: Rethinking child protection strategy: child protection and assessment. In: Bucks New University Safeguarding Conference: Exploring professional issues for child and adult safeguarding, Buckinghamshire New University, UK, 8-9 June 2015.
Anonymised. 2021. Anonymous.
Anonymised. 2019. Anonymous.
Author & Anonymous. 2017. Anonymous.
Furber, C. (2010) Framework analysis: A method for analysing qualitative data. African Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 4, 2, 97–100.
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S. and Redwood, S. (2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 117, 1-8.
Gardner, J. and Harmon, T. (2002) Exploring resilience from a parent's perspective: A qualitative study of six resilient mothers of children with an intellectual disability. Australian Social Work, 55, 1, 60-68.
Gaughan, L. and Garrett, P.M. (2012) The ‘most twisted and unaccountable force in the state’? Newspaper accounts of social work in the Republic of Ireland in troubled times. Journal of Social Work, 12, 3, 267-287.
Gergen, K.J. (2001) Social Constructionism in Context. London: Sage publications.
Ghaffar, W., Manby, M. and Race, T. (2012) Exploring the experiences of parents and carers whose children have been subject to child protection plans. The British Journal of Social Work, 42, 5, 887-905.
Goodley, D. (2016) Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Houston, S., Montgomery, L. and MacDonald, M. (2020) Parenting Capacity Assessment and Enhancement when a Child has Complex Needs, Developmental Delay or a Disability: A companion’s monograph to 'building better futures'. Belfast: Belfast, Health and Social Care Board.
Jones, L., Bellis, M. A., Wood, S., Hughes, K., McCoy, E., Eckley, L., Bates, G., Mikton, C., Shakespeare, T. and Officer, A. (2012) Prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. The Lancet, 380, 9845, 899–907.
McGregor, C. (2013) Child Protection Systems: International trends and orientations. London: Sage publications.
Mellon, M. (2017) Child Protection: listening to and learning from parents. [Accessed 22.07.2022 at https://www.iriss.org.uk/resources/insights/child-protection-listening-and-learning-parents]
Merriam, S.B. (2009) Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation.
San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
O'Mahony, C. and Quinn, G. (2017) Disability Law and Policy: An Analysis of the UN Convention. Dublin: Clarus Press.
Parkinson, S., Eatough, V., Holmes, J., Stapley, E. and Migdley, N. (2016) Framework analysis: A worked example of a study exploring young peoples experiences of depression. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13, 2, 109–129.
Ritchie, J., Spencer, L. and O’Connor, W. (2003) Carrying out qualitative analysis. In J. Ritchie and J. Lewis (Eds.) Qualitative Research Practice. A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications (pp. 219–262).
Ritchie, J. and Spencer, L. (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In B. Bryman and R. Burgess (Eds.) Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Routledge (pp. 173–194).
Shakespeare, T. (2014) Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. 2nd Edn. Oxon: Routledge.
Silverman, D. (2016) Qualitative Research. 4th Edn. Los Angeles: Sage.
Skehill, C. (2004) History of the Present of Child Protection and Welfare in Ireland. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.
Smith, J. and Firth, J. (2011) Qualitative data analysis: The framework approach. Nurse Researcher, 18, 2, 52–62.
Spratt, T. and Callan, J. (2004) ‘Parents’ views on social work interventions in child welfare
cases’. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 2, pp. 199-224.
Spratt, T., Devaney, J. and Frederick, J. (2019) Adverse childhood experiences: beyond signs of safety: reimagining the organisation and practice of social work with children and families. British Journal of Social Work, 49, 8, 2042–2058.
Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. 2nd Edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Stalker, K., Green Lister, P., Lerpiniere, J. and McArthur, K. (2010) Child protection and the needs and rights of disabled children: Abridged report. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Faculty of Education/Sir Halley Stewart Trust.
Stalker, K. and McArthur, K. (2012) Child abuse, child protection and disabled children: A review of recent research. Child Abuse Review, 21, 2, 24–40.
Sullivan, P. and Knutson, J. (2000) Maltreatment and disabilities: A population-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 10, 1257–1273.
Taylor, J., Stalker, K., Fry, D. and Stewart, A. (2014) Disabled Children and Child Protection in Scotland: An investigation into the relationship between professional practice, child protection and disability. Edinburgh: Scottish Government Children’s Rights and Wellbeing Division.
Turnell, A. and Murphy, T. (2014) The Signs of Safety® Child Protection Approach and Framework: Comprehensive briefing paper. 3rd Edn. Australia: Consultancy.
Turnell, A. (2006) Constructive child protection practice: An oxymoron or news of difference? Journal of Systemic Therapies, 25, 2, 3–12.
Turnell, A. (2013) Safety Planning Workbook. Perth, Western Australia: Resolutions Consultancy.
Tusla (2016) A report on parental experiences in TUSLA Child Protection Conferences in Galway and Roscommon. [Accessed 22.07.2022 at https://www.tusla.ie/uploads/content/Reportfinal_Marie_Gibbons.pdf]
Vanderminden, J., Cameron, A., Fry, D. and Lannen, P. (2017) Child Protection and Disability: Ethical, methodological and practical challenges for research. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press Ltd.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright lies with the journal. Enquiries regarding reproduction should be sent in the first place to enquiries@whitingbirch.netAccepted 2022-12-21
Published 2023-11-13
