Opportunities and challenges in digital social work with people re-entering society from prison

– Qualitative analysis of Finnish social workers’ views

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr20252620

Keywords:

Digital social work, Digitalisation, Incarcerated people, Re-entry, Social work

Abstract

This article explores Finnish social workers’ views on using digital technologies to support individuals transitioning from prison to society. A study based onthe Fit Between Individuals, Tasks, Technology, and Environment (FITTE) framework, digital divide research and a relationship-based approach, with interviews with 19 social workers, reveals that digitalisation improves resource allocation, service availability and communication within collaborative networks. Challenges include underdeveloped digital tools, limited client access and skills, and difficulties in conducting assessments and building trust online. The question of whether a confidential relationship can be formed digitally remains contested. Hybrid practices are highlighted as essential for ensuring a smooth reintegration process.

Author Biographies

Tarja Juvonen, Laurea University of Applied Sciences

Tarja Juvonen* (D.Soc.Sc., licensed social worker) is a Principal Lecturer and Researcher and member of the Correctional Services Research Group at Laurea University of Applied Sciences. Her research interests are focused on social work practices and vulnerable youth and families. Her current research project addresses multidisciplinary social work supporting people leaving prison.

Teemu Rantanen, Laurea University of Applied Sciences

Teemu Rantanen (D.Soc.Sc.) is a Principal Lecturer at Laurea University of Applied Sciences and an Adjunct Professor of Social Psychology at the University of Helsinki.

Hanna Rantala, Laurea University of Applied Sciences

Hanna Rantala (MSc, MA) is a RDI specialist member of the Correctional Services Research Group at Laurea University of Applied Sciences.

Mari Suonio, University of Eastern Finland

Mari Suonio (M.Soc.Sc, licensed social worker) is a university teacher and researcher at the University of Eastern Finland.

References

Ajzen, I. (2001) Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1, 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27.

Billig, M. (1987) Arguing and Thinking. A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.

Byrne, J. and Kirwan, G. (2019) Relationship-based social work and electronic communication technologies: anticipation, adaptation and achievement. Journal of Social Work Practice, 332, 2, 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2019.1604499

Coomans, S. K., Virtanen, L., Kaihlanen, A-M., Rantanen, T., Clemens, T. and Heponiemi, T. (2024) Remote mental health services during the COVID‑19 pandemic in Finland and the Netherlands: a qualitative study. Discover Mental Health, 4, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-024-00088-z

Crewe, B., Schliehe, A. & Przybylska, D.A. (2023) ‘It causes a lot of problems’: Relational ambiguities and dynamics between prisoners and staff in a women’s prison. European Journal of Criminology, 20, 3, 925–946. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708221140870

Davis, F.D., Bagozzi R.P. & Warshaw P.R. (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 8, 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

European commission. (2020) Shaping Europe’s digital future. European commission. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/content/ european-digital-strategy

European Commission (2022) Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022. Thematic chapters. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/redirection/document/88764

Goodhue, D. L., Klein, B. D. and March, S. T. (2000) User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance. Information & management, 38, 2, 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00057-4

Granholm, C. (2016) Social work in digital transfer - blending services for the next generation. Doctoral dissertation. University of Helsinki. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/160815

Hansen, H-T., Lundberg, K. and Syltevik, L. J. (2016) Digitalization, street-level bureaucracy and welfare users’ experiences. Social Policy & Administration, 52, 1, 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12283

Helsper, E. J. (2021) The Digital Disconnect: The social causes and consequences of digital inequalities. London: Sage Publications.

Helsper, E. J. and Reisdorf, B. C. (2017) The emergence of a ‘digital underclass’ in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19, 8, 1253–1270.https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634676

Holden, R. J. and Karsh, B. T. (2010) The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 43, 1,159-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002

Hollinrake, S. (2019) Theoretical perspectives for relationship-based practice with adults. In H. Dix, S. Hollinrake and J. Meade (Eds.), Relationship-based social work with adults. St Albans: Critical Publishing.

Hämäläinen, J., & Lindh, J. (2025). Social work in an information-intensive era: Digitalization in social work practices, expertise, training, and research. International social work. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728251382817

Jewkes, Y. and Reisdorf, B. C. (2016) A brave new world: The problems and opportunities presented by new media technologies in prisons. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(5), 534–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895816654953

Julkunen, I., Mauri, D., Ruch, G. and Isokuortti, N. (2023) Connecting social work research with policy and practice: Issues of people, power and politics. European Social Work Research, 1, 1, 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1332/CIKV6449

Järveläinen, E. (2022) The multiple meanings of social interaction. Rhetoric analysis on the significance of social interaction between social work professionals and people with a history of crime. Doctoral dissertation. University of Eastern Finland. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-61-4527-3

Järveläinen, E. and Rantanen, T. (2021) Incarcerated people’s challenges for digital inclusion in Finnish prisons. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 22, 2, 240–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/2578983X.2020.1819092

Järveläinen, E., Rantanen, T. and Toikko, T. (2023) Meanings of a client-employee relationship in social work: Clients’ perspectives on desisting from crime. Nordic Social Work Research, 13, 2, 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2021.1981984

Kaihlanen, A., Virtanen, L., Kainiemi, E. and Heponiemi T. (2023) Professionals evaluating clients’ suitability for digital health and social care: Scoping review of assessment instruments. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25:e51450. https://doi.org/10.2196/51450

Karjalainen, P., Metteri, A. and Strömberg-Jakka, M. (2019) Tiekartta 2030. Aikuisten parissa tehtävän sosiaalityön tulevaisuusselvitys. [Roadmap 2030: Future Study on Social Work Among Adults.] Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriön raportteja ja muistioita 41. Helsinki: Sosiaali- ja terveysministeriö. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-00-4076-5

Kenemore, T. K. (2013). Social work practice with reentry from incarceration. In J. B. Rosenberger (Eds) Relational Social Work Practice with Diverse Populations: A Relational Approach (pp. 239-260). New York, NY: Springer New York.

Kirwan, G. (2023) Networked Relationships. Relationship-Based Social Work Practice in the Digital Era. In A. López Peláez and G. Kirwan (Eds.) The Routledge International Handbook of Digital Social Work (1st ed., pp. 46–56). Routledge.

Kivipelto, M. and Elovainio M. (2024) Aikuissosiaalityön tilannekuva 2024 – kyselyn tuloksia. [Adult Social Work Status Report 2024 – Survey Results.] Tutkimuksesta tiiviisti 26/2024. Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-408-329-4

Kivipelto, M. and Matthies, A-L. (2024) What enables ‘real social work’ in adult social work? Examining mechanism-based explanations. European Social Work Research, 2,1, 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1332/27551768y2024d000000009

Liebling, A. and Arnold, H. (2012) Social relationships between prisoners in a maximum security prison: Violence, faith and the declining nature of trust. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 5, 413-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.06.003

López Peláez, A. and Kirwan, G. (2023) The future of digital social work. Trends, Challenges and Opportunities. In A. López Peláez and G. Kirwan (Eds.) The Routledge International Handbook of Digital Social Work (1st ed., pp. 516–517). Routledge.

Mahlangu, G. and Zivanai E. (2023) Offender eLearning: A systematic literature review on re-entry, recidivism, and life after prison. Cogent Social Sciences, 9, 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2246706

McDougall, C., Pearson, D. A., Torgerson, D. J. and Garcia-Reyes, M. (2017) The effect of digital technology on prisoner behavior and reoffending: A natural stepped-wedge design. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 4, 455-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9303-5

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (2024) National Objectives for the Organisation of Healthcare and Social Welfare. Publications of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 7. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/165430/STM_2024_7_J.pdf

Nordesjö, K. and Scaramuzzino, G. (2023) Digitalization, stress, and social worker–client relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Social Work, 23, 6, 1080-1098 https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173231180309.

Nordesjö, K., Scaramuzzino, G. and Ulmestig, R. (2022) The social worker-client relationship in the digital era: A configurative literature review. European Journal of Social Work, 25, 2, 303– 315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1964445

Paatela, S., Karreinen, S. and Tynkkynen, L-K. (2024) Ylimmän johdon näkemyksiä integraation etenemisestä ja edellytyksistä hyvinvointialueilla. [Senior Leadership Perspectives on the Progress and Preconditions of Integration in Wellbeing Services Counties.] Tutkimuksesta tiiviisti 9/2024. Helsinki: Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-408-272-3

Partanen, T., Seppänen-Järvelä, R., Hiekkala, S. and Lindh, J. (2025) Sociotechnical adaptation of telerehabilitation in rehabilitation practice: survey among rehabilitation professionals. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies,12, e74296. https://doi.org/10.2196/74296

Pascoe, K. M. (2022) Remote service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: Questioning the impact of technology on relationship-based social work practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 52, 6, 3268–3287. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab242

Peltola, S. and Vesala, K. M. (2013) Constructing entrepreneurial orientation in a selling context: The qualitative attitude approach. Poznan University of Economics Review, 13, 1, 26–47. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2013.1.2342

Pink, S., Ferguson, H. and Kelly, L. (2022) Digital social work: Conceptualising a hybrid anticipatory practice. Qualitative Social Work, 21, 2, 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211003647

Prgomet, M., Georgiou, A., Callen, J. and Westbrook, J. (2019) Fit between Individuals, Tasks, Technology, and Environment (FITTE) framework: A proposed extension of FITT to evaluate and optimise health information technology use. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 264, 744–748. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190322

Puolakka, P. (2021) Smart Prison: A historical digital leap in Finnish prisons. Justice Trends, 7. https://justice-trends.press/smart-prison-a-historical-digital-leap-in-finnish-prisons/

Pyykönen, A-M. (2020) Digitalisaatio sosiaalityössä [Digitalization in social work.] In A. Pehkonen, R-L. Kinni and P. Puurunen (Eds.), Sosiaalisesti kestävää Kymenlaaksoa tekemässä. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland, General Series, 13, 208–230.. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-61-3729-2

Pyysiäinen, J. and Vesala, K., M. (2013) Activating Farmers. Uses of Entrepreneurship Discourse in the Rhetoric of Policy Implementers. Discourse & Communication, 7, 1, 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312466475

Ranta, J., Kaskela, T., Nurmi, J., Ruokolainen, T. and Shorter, G. W. (2024) Relational anonymity in reducing the harms of illicit drug use: Accounts of users of dark web- and street-based services in Finland. Harm Reduction Journal, 21, Article 224, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01139-y

Rantanen, T., Järveläinen, E. and Leppälahti, T. (2025) Trust and the use of digital social and healthcare services among incarcerated people: A mixed methods study in Finnish prisons. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2, e70055. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.70055

Rantanen, T., Järveläinen, E. and Leppälahti, T. (2022) Self-efficacy and use of digital health care and social welfare services among incarcerated people: Cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24, 5, e36799. https://doi.org/10.2196/36799

Reisdorf, B. C. and DeCook, J. R. (2022) Locked up and left out: Formerly incarcerated people in the context of digital inclusion. New Media & Society, 24, 2, 478–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211063178.

Reisdorf, B. C. and Rikard, R. V. (2018) Digital rehabilitation: A Model of Reentry into the digital age. The American Behavioral Scientist, 62, 9, 1273–1290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218773817

Romakkaniemi, M., Kivistö, M., Harrikari, T., Fiorentino, V., Leppiaho, T. and Hautala, S. (2023) Emerging opportunities for relationship-based social work? Finnish social workers’ reflections on utilising digital environments during two phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Social Work, 27, 5, 952–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2023.2196374

Ruch, G., Turney, D. and Ward, A. (2018) Relationship-Based Social Work: Getting to the heart of practice. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

Saukkonen, P., Elovainio, M., Salovaara, S., Virtanen, L., Kaihlanen, A.-M., Kainiemi, E., Vehko, T., and Heponiemi, T. (2024) Perceived effects of digitalization on social work in Finland: A network analysis approach. International Social Work, 67, 6, 1464-1481. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208728241265015

Silvennoinen, P. and Rantanen, T. (2023) Digital agency of vulnerable people as experienced by rehabilitation professionals. Technology in Society, 72, Article 102173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102173

Steiner, O. (2021). Social Work in the Digital Era: Theoretical, Ethical and Practical Considerations. The British journal of social work, 51(8), 3358-3374. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa160

Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. University of Chicago Press.

The Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (TENK) (2019) The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. https://tenk.fi/sites/default/files/2021-01/Ethical_review_in_human_sciences_2020.pdf

Vila-Henninger, L., Dupuy, C., Van Ingelgom, V., Caprioli, M., Teuber, F., Pennetreau, D., Bussi, M., & Le Gall, C. (2024). Abductive coding: Theory building and qualitative (re)analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(2), 968–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211067508

Williams, H., Faith, B. and Waldman, L. (2024) Technologies of inclusion and marginalization: Mobile phones and multiple exclusion homeless women. Mobile Media & Communication, 12, 2, 404–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579231211498

Wolf, L. and Goldkind, L. (2016) Digital Native meet friendly visitor: A Flexner-inspired call to digital action. Journal of Social Work Education, 52, S1, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.117464

Zivanai, E. and Mahlangu, G. (2022) Digital prison rehabilitation and successful re-entry into a digital society: A systematic literature review on the new reality on prison rehabilitation. Cogent Social Sciences, 8, Article 2116809. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2116809

Published

2026-03-11

How to Cite

Juvonen, T., Rantanen, T., Rantala, H., & Suonio, M. (2026). Opportunities and challenges in digital social work with people re-entering society from prison : – Qualitative analysis of Finnish social workers’ views. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr20252620
Received 2025-11-11
Accepted 2026-03-11
Published 2026-03-11