Transitions to adulthood

Authors

  • Chris Grover
  • John Stewart
  • Karen Broadhurst

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v11i1.426

Abstract

The article argues that New Labour’s concern with productive moral citizenship underlies the model of ‘corporate parent’ which informs the Children (Leaving Care) Act, 2000. We show that there has been in statutory child care work a rather uncritical acceptance of ‘good parenting’ leading to ‘good outcomes’, based on the ‘Looking after Children’ (LAC) system. The Children (Leaving Care) Act, 2000, has transferred significant duties from the social security system to local government social services departments for the payment of personal allowances and housing costs of young people leaving care. It has provided powers for the discretionary interpretation of their circumstances and provision for their welfare, all as part of a social work assessment called a ‘Pathway Plan’. The government, through this legislation, presupposes that care leavers will benefit from a simulated experience of the transition to adulthood enjoyed by non-care leavers. The poverty and deprivation leading to social exclusion experienced by a significant minority of non careleavers is in fact the financial baseline of the provisions in this legislation. It is therefore hardly surprising that we find inherent tensions and contradictions within the legislative framework and the context of its implementation for social services and the practice of social workers with care leavers.

References

Biehal, N. and Warde, J. (1999) ‘I thought it would be easier.’ The early housing careers of young people leaving care. in J. Rugg (ed.) <i>Young People, Housing and Social Policy</i>. London: Routledge\nBritton, L., Chatrik, B., Coles, B., Craig, G., Hylton, C. and Mumtaz, S., with Bivan, P. and Convery, P. (2002) <i>Missing Connexions: The career dynamics and welfare needs of young people at the margins</i>. York: Joseph Rowntree foundation\nBroad, B. (1998) <i>Young People Leaving Care: Life after the Children Act 1989</i>. London: Jessica Kingsley\nButler, I. and Payne, H. (1997) The health of children looked after by the Local Authority. <i>Adoption and Fostering</i>, 17, 3, 25-35\nDeacon, A. (2000) ‘Learning from the US?’ The influence of American ideas upon new Labour thinking on welfare reform. <i>Policy and Politics</i>, 28, 1, 5-18\nDepartment of Health (1988) <i>Protecting Children: A guide for social workers undertaking comprehensive assessment</i>. London: HMSO\nDepartment of Health (1998a) <i>Modernising Social Services: Promoting independence, improving protection, raising standards</i>. Cm.4169, London: TSO\nDepartment of Health (1998b) <i>The Government’s Response to the Children’s Safeguards Review</i>. Cm.4105, London: TSO\nDepartment of Health (1998c) <i>Someone Else’s Children.</i> London: HMSO\nDepartment of Health (1999) <i>Me, Survive, Out There? New arrangements for young people living in and leaving care</i>, London: Department of Health\nDepartment of Health (2001) <i>Children (Leaving Care) Act, 2000. Regulations and Guidance</i>. London: Department of Health\nDepartment of Health (2000) <i>Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families.</i> London: HMSO\nDriver, S. and Martell, L. (1997) New Labour’s communitarians. <i>Critical Social Policy</i>, 17, 27-46\nDriver, S. and Martell, L. (2002) <i>Blair’s Britain</i>. Cambridge: Polity\nFitzpatrick, S. (2000) <i>Young Homeless People</i>. Basingstoke: Macmillan\nFrance, A. and Wiles, P. (1997) Dangerous Futures: Social exclusion and youth work in late modernity<i>.Social Policy and Administration</i>. 31, 5, 59-78\nFrost, N, Mills, S. and Stein, M. (1999) <i>Understanding Residential Care</i>. Aldershot: Ashgate\nGarrett, P. M. (1999) Producing the moral citizen: The ‘looking after children’ system and the regulation of children and young people in public care. <i>Critical Social Policy</i>, 19, 3, 291-311\nGarrett, P. M. (2002) Yes Minister: Reviewing the ‘looking after children’ experience and identifying the messages for social work research. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 32, 831-846\nGoldson, B. and Jamieson, J. (2002) Youth crime, the ‘parenting deficit’ and state intervention: A contextual critique. <i>Youth Justice</i>, 2, 2, 82-99\nHouse of Commons Debates (2000a) Children (Leaving Care) Bill, 21 June, 352, cols. 357-420\nHouse of Commons Debates (2000b) Children (Leaving Care) Bill, 31 October, 355, cols. 634-685\nHayes, D. (2002) Councils slow to apply Act, as care leavers continue to struggle. <i>Community Care</i>, 17th October, 18-19\nHome Office (1960) <i>Report of the Committee on Children and Young Persons</i>. (The Ingleby Committee) Cmnd. 1191. London: HMSO\nHyland, T. and Musson, D. (2001) Unpacking the New Deal for Young People: Promise and problems. <i>Educational Studies</i>, 27, 1, 55-67\nStanding Committee A (2000a) <i>Children (Leaving Care) Bill [Lords], First Sitting</i>. London: TSO\nStanding Committee A (2000b) <i>Children (Leaving Care) Bill [Lords], Second Sitting</i>. London: TSO\nStanding Committee A (2000c) <i>Children (Leaving Care) Bill [Lords], Third Sitting</i>. London: TSO\nStanding Committee A (2000d) <i>Children (Leaving Care) Bill [Lords], Fourth Sitting</i>. London: TSO\nStanding Committee A (2000e) <i>Children (Leaving Care) Bill [Lords], Fifth Sitting</i>. London: TSO\nStephenson, S. (2001) Street children in Moscow: Using and creating social capital. <i>The Sociological Review</i>, 49, 4, 530-547\nUtting, W. (1997) <i>People Like Us. Summary report of the review of the safeguards for children living away from home</i>. Department of Health/The Welsh Office. London: HMSO\nWard, H. (1995) Revising the content of the Assessment and Action Records. in H. Ward (ed.) <i>Looking after Children: Research into practice</i>. London: HMSO\n

Downloads

Published

2012-12-26

How to Cite

Grover, C., Stewart, J., & Broadhurst, K. (2012). Transitions to adulthood. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 11(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v11i1.426