Social work practice and identity in joined-up teams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v11i3.439Keywords:
<i>social work</i>, <i>identity</i>, <i>joined-up</i>, <i>teams</i>, <i>multi-disciplinary</i>Abstract
This paper draws on an ESRC project that explored how multi-disciplinary teams work together in their practice with children. The specific aim of this paper is to examine the role of the social worker in such teams by focussing on some of the possibilities and tensions. It is concluded that, despite the many challenges, social work has a positive role to play in developing the joined up policy and practice agenda.
References
Allen, C. (2003) Desperately seeking fusion: on ‘joined-up thinking’, ‘holistic practice’ and the new economy of welfare professional power. British Journal of Sociology, 54, 2, 287-306.nAtkinson, M., Wilkin, A., Scott, A., and Kinder, K. (2001) Multi-Agency Activity: An audit of activity. Local Government Association Research, Report 17. Slough: National Foundation for Education and ResearchnBirchall, E., and Hallett, C. (1995) Working Together in Child Protection. London: HMSOnChaiklin, S., and Lave, J. (Eds.) (1993) Understanding Practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressnDepartment for Education and Skills (1998) Meeting the Childcare Challenge. London: The Stationery OfficenDepartment for Education and Skills (2003) Every Child Matters. Norwich: The Stationery OfficenDonzelot, J. (1979) The Policing of Families. London: HutchinsonnEasen, P., Atkins, M., and Dyson, A. (2000) Inter-professional collaboration and conceptualisations of practice. Children and Society, 14, 335-367nEngestrom, E. (Ed.) 1999. Perspectives on Activity Theory. New York: Cambridge University PressnEngestrom, Y. (2001) Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualisation, Journal of Education and Work, 14, 1, 133-156nFrost, N. (2005) Professionalism, Partnership and Joined-up Thinking: A research review of frontline working with children. Dartington: Research in PracticenGlisson, C. Hemmelgarn, A. (2003) The effects of organisational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children’s service systems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, 5, 401-421nHallett, C., and Birchall, E. (1992) Co-ordination and Child Protection: A review of the literature. London: HMSOnJordan, B. (2000) Social Work and the Third Way. London: SagenLave, J., Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressnOnyett, S., Heppleston, T., and Bushnell, D. (1994) A national survey of community mental health teams. Team structure and process. Journal of Mental Health, 3, 175-194nOvretveit, J. (1993) Co-ordinating Community Care: Multidisciplinary teams and care management. Buckingham: Open University PressnParton, N. (1985) The Politics of Child Abuse. London: Macmillan.nSims, D., Fineman, S., and Gabriel, Y. 1993 Organizing and Organizations. London: SagenSullivan, H. and Skelcher, C. (2002) Working Across Boundaries, Collaboration in the Public Services. Basingstoke: PalgravenWenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press:n