Prying open the space for social work in the new millennium

Stan Houston; Caroline Skehill; John Pinkerton; Jim Campbell

doi:10.1921/swssr.v12i1.444

Authors

Stan Houston
Caroline Skehill
John Pinkerton
Jim Campbell

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v12i1.444

Keywords:

transformative social work practice, discursive space, theoretical perspectives

Abstract

Social work in the United Kingdom faces all manner of woes. Critical public inquiries, disgruntled users of the service, the bureaucratisation of practice, problems with recruitment, and the overhaul of training, all continue to reinforce a culture of pessimism. It has been suggested that social work in the United Kingdom stands at the crossroads where a decision must be made either to accept these depressing conditions as they are, or to challenge them by asserting a new future for a reinvigorated profession. The latter option is supported by the authors of this article because we share the view that as social workers we have available to us discursive freedom with which to analyse the profession’s contemporary ailments and to find a way through them based on a discourse of social justice. The idea and practice of discursive freedom can be captured in the heuristic notion of ‘space’ which the authors use here as a shared focus for analysing contemporary social work from four different critical perspectives. In this way a dialogue is promoted between theory and practice and within critical theory. In its method and its results this inquiry is still very much work-in-progress. This provisional quality sits comfortably with the notion of ‘space’ and gives rein to its recursive qualities. These qualities, it is argued, must lie at the heart of transformative social work.

References

Bion, W. (1959) Learning from Experience. London: Heinemann\nBlaug, R. (1995) Distortion of the face to face: Communicative reason and social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 4, 423-440\nBolger, S., Corrigan, P., Docking, J. and Frost, N. (1981) Towards Socialist Welfare Work: Working in the state. London: Macmillan\nClarke, J. (1996) After social work. in N. Parton (Ed.) Social Theory, Social Change and Social Work. London: Routledge\nDean, M. (1994) Critical and Effective Histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge\nDelanty, G. (1999) Social Theory in a Changing World: Conceptions of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press\nDingwall, E., Eekelaar, J. and Murray, T. (1983) The Protection of Children: State intervention and family life. Oxford: Basil Blackwell\nDingwall, E., Eekelaar, J. and Murray, T. (1998) Families and the State: A historical perspective on the public regulation of private conduct. Law and Policy, 10, 4, 341-61\nDonzelot, J. (1980) The Policing of Families: Welfare versus the State. London: Hutchinson.\nFoucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. [trans. A.M. Sherridan-Smith] London: Routledge\nFoucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish. [trans. A.M. Sherridan-Smith] Harmondsworth: Penguin\nGarland (1992) Criminological knowledge and its relation to power: Foucault’s genealogy and criminology today. British Journal of Criminology 32, 4, 403-422\nGiddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press\nHabermas, J. (1968) Knowledge and Human Interests. London: Heinemann\nHabermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the rationalisation of society. Cambridge: Polity Press\nHabermas, J. (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two – Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Cambridge: Polity Press\nHabermas, J. (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press\nHabermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: Polity Press\nHealey, K. (2000) Social Work Practices: Contemporary perspectives on change. London: Sage\nHinshelwood, R.D. (1996) Convergences with psychoanalysis. in I. Parker and R. Spears, (Eds.) Psychology and Society: Radical theory and practice. London: Pluto\nHouston, S. (2002) Re-thinking a systemic approach to child welfare: A critical response to the framework for the assessment of children in need and their families. European Journal of Social Work, 5, 301-312\nHowe, D. (1993) On Being a Client: Understanding the process of counselling and psychotherapy. London: Sage\nHowe, D. (1996) Surface and depth in social work practice. in N. Parton (Ed.) Social Theory, Social Change and Social Work. London: Routledge\nJones, M. (2001a) Voices from the front line: State social workers and New Labour. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 547-562\nJones, I. (2001b) Health care decision making and the politics of health. in Scrambler, G. (Ed.) Habermas, Critical Theory and Health. London, Routledge\nKapur, R. and Campbell, J. (2004) The Troubled Mind of Northern Ireland. London: Karnac\nKlein, M. (1963) Our Adult World and Other Essays. London: Heinnemann\nLacan, J. (1966) Écrits: A Selection. London: Tavistock\nLayder, D (1997) Modern Social Theory: Key debates and new directions. Leicester: UCL Press\nLeonard, P. (1975) Towards a paradigm for radical practice. in R. Bailey, and M. Brake (Eds.) Radical Social Work. London: Edward Arnold\nLymberry, M. (2001) Social work at the crossroads. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 369-384\nMills, C.W. (1959) The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press\nMullender, A. and Ward, D. (1991) Self-Directed Groupwork: Users take action for empowerment. London: Whiting Birch\nParton, N. (1991) Governing the Family: Child care, child protection and the State. Basingstoke: Macmillan\nParton, N. (1996) Social work, risk and the ‘blaming society’. in N. Parton (Ed.) Social Theory, Social Change and Social Work. London: Routledge\nParton, N. (1998) Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 28, 5-27\nParton, N. (1999) Reconfiguring child welfare practices: Risk, advanced liberalism, and the government of freedom. in A.S. Chambon, A. Irving, and L. Epstein Reading Foucault for Social Work. New York: Columbia University Press\nPhilp, M. (1979) Notes on the form of knowledge in social work. Sociological Review 27, 1, 83-111\nPincus, A. and Minihan, A. (1973) Social Work Practice: Model and method. Itasca, IL: Peacock\nRojek, C., Peacock, G. and Collins, S. (1989) Social Work and Received Ideas. London: Routledge\nRustin, M. (1991) The Good Society and the Inner World. London: Verso.\nSegal, H. (1995) From Hiroshima to the Gulf War and after: A psychoanalytic perspective. in A. Elliot and S. Frosh (Eds.) Pyschoanalysis in Contexts. London: Routledge.\nSibeon, R. (2004) Re-Thinking Social Theory. London, Sage\nSkehill, C. (2003) Social work in Ireland: A History of the present. Journal of Social Work, 3, 2, 141-159\nSkehill, C. (2004) A History of the Present of Social Work within the Child Protection and Welfare System in the Republic of Ireland. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press\nTillich, P. (1967) On the Boundary: An autobiographical sketch. London: Collins\nValentine, M. (1994) The social worker as ‘bad object’. British Journal of Social Work, 24, 74-86\n