The elusive search for the silver bullet in prevention and family support programs for vulnerable families

Terry Carrilio

doi:10.1921/swssr.v12i2.452

Authors

Terry Carrilio

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v12i2.452

Keywords:

home visiting, prevention, family support, programme evaluation

Abstract

Since the 1970s home visiting has been seen as a promising prevention and family support strategy. Programmes proliferated, with various funding, conceptual, and structural characteristics. Policy makers, funders and practitioners have been avidly seeking evidence of programme effectiveness. Research results have been disappointing, often showing modest results. The search for clarity continues, often with high political and programmatic stakes. This paper describes the results from three projects, representing elaborations of the Healthy Families model, covering 25 sites. Findings suggest that programme effects were experienced differentially based on ethnicity and initial mental health status.

References

Abidin, R. (1995) Parenting Stress Index. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc., 16204 N. Florida Ave., Lutz, Florida, 33549\nBayley, N. (1993) Bayley Scales of Infant Development (2nd ed.) New York: The Psychological Corporation\nBarlow, J., Stewart-Brown, S., Callaghan, H., Tucker, J., Brocklehurst, N., Davis, H., and Burns, C. (2003) Child Abuse Review, 12, 172-189\nBavolek, S.J. and Keene, R.G. (1999) Handbook for the AAPI-2: Adult-adolescent parenting inventory. Park City, UT: Family Development Resources\nCaldwell B., and Bradley, R. (1984) Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment, (HOME) (revised ed.) HOME INVENTORY LLC, Distribution Center, and 2627 Winsor Drive, Eau Claire, WI 54703\nCarrilio, T. (1998) The California Safe and Healthy Families Family Support Home Visiting Model: Executive summary. (2nd ed.) Sacramento, CA: California Office of Child Abuse Prevention\nCarrilio, T. (2001) Family support program development: Integrating research, practice and policy. Journal of Family Social Work, 6, 3, 53-78\nCarrilio, T.E. (2003) Learning from experience? A review of three California initiatives addressing the needs of vulnerable families. Social Policy Journal, 2, 2/3, 5-25\nCarrilio, T.E. and Min, J.W. (2003) Data analysis of Healthy Families-San Diego, CALSAHF, and ABC. [Final report. Presented to the California Department of Social Services] San Diego, CA: Social Policy Institute\nCarrilio, T., Packard, T., Canady, L., Darling, M., Bergthold, T., Chamberlin. J., Doroski, E., and Gamble, L. (2002) Final Report: Answers benefiting children program evaluation. [Technical report presented to the California Department of Social Services Office of Child Abuse Prevention] San Diego, CA: Social Policy Institute\nCarrilio, T.E., Packard, T.R., and Clapp, J.D. (2003) Nothing in, nothing out: Barriers to data based program planning. Administration in Social Work, 27, 4, 61-75\nDaro, D. (2005) Letter to the Editor: Response to Chaffin, 2004. Child abuse and Neglect, 29, 237-240\nDaro, D. and Donnelly, A.C. (2002) Charting the waves of prevention: Two steps forward, one step back. Child Abuse and Neglect, 26, 731-742\nDaro, D., McCurdy, Falconnier, L., and Stojanovic, D. (2003) Sustaining new parents in home visitation services: Key participant and program factors. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27, 1101-1125\nDuggan, A., McFarlane, E., Fuddy, L., Burrell, L., Higman, S.M., Windham, A., and Sia, C. (2004) Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program: Impact in preventing child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse and Neglect, 28, 597-622\nDuggan, A., McFarlane, E., Windham, A., Rohde, C., Salkever, D., Fuddy, L., Rosenberg, L., Buchbinder, S., and Sia, C. (1999) Evaluation of Hawaii’s Healthy Start Program. in R. Behrman The Future of Children: Recent program evaluations, 9, 1, 66-90. Los Altos, CA: David and Lucille Packard Foundation.\nEwing, J., and Mayfield, D. (1974) CAGE. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 112-122\nGavin, D.R., Ross. H.E., and Skinner, H.A., (1989) Diagnostic validity of the Drug Abuse Screening Test in the assessment of DSM-III drug disorders. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 301-307\nGomby, D. (1999) Understanding evaluations of home visitation programs. in R. Behrman, The Future of Children: Recent program evaluations, 9, 1, 27-43. Los Altos, CA: David and Lucille Packard Foundation\nGomby, D., Culross, P., and Behrman, R. (1999) Home visiting: Recent program evaluations – analysis and recommendations. in R. Behrman The Future of Children: Recent program evaluations, 9, 1, 4-26. Los Altos, CA: David and Lucille Packard Foundation\nGomby, D., Larson, C., Lewitt, E.M., and Behrman, R. (1993) Home visiting: analysis and recommendations. in R, Behrman The Future of Children: Home visiting, 3, 3, 6-22. Los Altos, CA: David and Lucille Packard Foundation\nGuterman, N.B. (2001) Stopping Child Maltreatment before it Starts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage\nHahn, R.A., Mercy, J., Bilukha, O., and Briss, P. (2005) Assessing home visiting programs to prevent child abuse: Taking silver and bronze along with gold. Child abuse and Neglect, 29, 3, 215-218\nHarachi, T.W., Abbott, R.D., Catalano, R.F., Haggerty, K.P., and Fleming, C.B. (1999) Opening the black box: Using process evaluation measures to assess implementation and theory building. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 5, 711-731\nHernandez, M. (2000) Using logic models and program theory to build outcome accountability. Education and Treatment of Children, 23, 1, 24-40\nIllig, D. (1998) Birth to Kindergarten: The importance of the early years. Sacramento: California Research Bureau, California State Library CR-98-001\nKaroly, L. Greenwood, P., Evringham, S.Hoube, J., Kilburn, M.R., Rydell, P., Saunders, M., and Chiesa, J. (1998) Investing in our Children: What we know and don’t know about the costs and benefits of early childhood interventions. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, Rand MR 898-TCWF.\nKitzman, H., Olds D.L., Henderson, C.R. Jr, Hanks, C., Cole, R., Tatelbaum, R., McConnochie, K.M., Sidora, K., Luckey, D.W., Shaver, D., Engelhardt K., James, D., and Barnard, K. (1997) Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing. A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 8, 644-52\nKrugman, R. (1993) Universal home visiting: A recommendation from the U.S. Advisory Board on Child Abuse and Neglect. in R. Behrman The Future of Children: Home visiting, 3, 3, 184-191. Los Altos, CA: David and Lucille Packard Foundation\nLandsverk, J., Carrilio, T., Connelly, C., and Ganger, W. (2001) Healthy Families San Diego. [Final technical report, submitted to the California Department of Social Services, The Wellness Foundation, and Stuart Foundation] San Diego, CA: Child and Adolescent Services Research Center\nLeff, S.H. and Mulkern, V. (2002) Lessons learned about science and participation from multisite evaluations. in J.M. Herrell, and R.B. Straw New Directions for Evaluation: Conducting multiple site evaluations in real-world settings. San Francisco: Jossey Bass\nMcGuigan, W.M., Katzev, A.R., and Pratt, C. (2003) Multi-level determinants of retention in a home-visiting child abuse prevention program. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27, 363-380\nOlds, D. (2003) Reducing program attrition in home visiting: What do we need to know? Child Abuse and Neglect. 27, 359-361\nOlds, D. Eckenrode, J. Henderson, C. Kitzman, H. Powers, J., Cole, R., Sidora, K., Morris, P., Pettitt, L., and Luckey, D.(1997) Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect: Fifteen-year followup of a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 8, 637-643\nOlds, D., Henderson, C., Kitzman, H., Eckenrode, J., Cole, R., and Tattlebaum, R. (1999) Prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses. in R. Behrman The Future of Children: Recent program evaluations, 9, 1, 44-63. Los Altos, CA: David and Lucille Packard Foundation\nPatton, M. (1997) Utilization-focused Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage\nRadloff, L.S. (1977) The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401\nRaudenbush, S.W., and Bryk, A.S. (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and data analysis methods. (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage\nReynolds, A.J., Temple, J., Robertson, D., and Mann, E. (2001) Long term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 18, 2339-2346\nSaunders, J.B., Asland, O.G., Babor, T.F., de la Fuente, J.R., and Grant, M. (1993) Development of The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption. II. Addiction, 88, 791-804\nSchorr, L. (1997) Common Purpose. New York: Anchor Doubleday\nSherwood, K.E. (2005) Evaluating home visitation: A case study of evaluation at the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. in M.Q. Patton, and P. Patrizi Teaching Evaluation Using the Case Method. New directions for evaluation. No. 105. pp. 59-78. San Fancisco: Jossey-Bass\nShonkoff, J.P., and Phillips, D.A. (2000) From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press\nSimmel, C. (2002) The shared family care development project: Challenges of implementing and evaluating a community based project. Children and Youth Services Review, 24, 6-7, 455-470\nStraus, M.A., Hamby, S.L., Boney-McCoy, S., and Sugarman, D.B. (1996) The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). Journal of Family Issues, 17, 3, 283-316\nStraw, R.B. and Herrell, J.M. (2002) A framework for understanding and improving multisite evaluations. in J.M. Herrell, and R.B. Straw New Directions for Evaluation: Conducting multiple site evaluations in real-world settings, 94, pp.5-15. San Francisco: Jossey Bass\nSweet, M.A. and Appelbaum, M.I. (2004) Is Home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Development, 75, 5, 1435-1456\nWagner, M., Spiker, D., Linn, M.I., Gerlach-Downie, S., and Hernandez, F. (2003) Dimensions of parental engagement in home visiting programs: Exploratory study. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23, 4, 171-187\nWasik, B., Bryant, D., Sparling, J., and Ramey, C. (1997). Mediating variables: Maternal problem solving. in R.T. Gross, D. Spiker, and C. Haynes The Infant Health and Development Program. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press\nWhyte, W., ed. (1991) Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage\n