But you should see their families
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v12i3.458Keywords:
<i>child abandonment</i>, <i>institutional care</i>, <i>countries in transition</i>, <i>Bulgaria</i>, <i>Roma</i>Abstract
The use of institutional care in countries in transition to capitalist economies in Eastern Europe and Central Asia continues to grow. This paper shows how common understandings of reasons for entry to care that blame parents lead to policies that are unable to address the situation of children and families. Effective social policy needs to find ways to see the predicaments of parents and overcome the blindness that can be induced by prejudice and ideology. The paper demonstrates how a small research project involving Roma women as researchers in Bulgaria was able to make parents visible and challenge commonly held views leading to the development of an effective local alternative to residential care.
References
Ainscow, M. and Haile-Giorgis, M. (1998) The Education of Children with Special Needs: Barriers and opportunities in Central and Eastern Europe. Innocenti Occasional Papers. Florence: UNICEF ICDC http://www.infoeuropa.ro/docs/Sector_fiche-Child_protection.pdf'>http://www.infoeuropa.ro/docs/Sector_fiche-Child_protection.pdfnBarter, K. (1994). Foster care crisis and management practices in public child welfare systems: An issue of partnership. Philosophy and practice in temporary foster care. Community Alternatives: International Journal of Family Care, 6, 89-105. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2001/03/08/000094946_01021705363340/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf'>www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2001/03/08/000094946_01021705363340/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdfnBertmar, A. (1999) Beneficiary Assessment of Children in Institutions in Armenia. Washington, DC: World Bank, Europe and Central Asia Region, Human Sector Development UnitnBilson, A. and Cox, P. (2007) Caring about Poverty: Alternatives to institutional care for children in poverty’ Childhood Poverty 13, 1, 37-55nBilson, A. and Harwin, J. (2003) Gatekeeping Services for Vulnerable Children and Families in the Changing Minds, Policies And Lives. UNICEF/World Bank series. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre,nBilson, A., Markova, G., and Petrova, M. (2003) Evaluation Report on Take Me Home 2 Project. unpublished report. London: Save the ChildrennBilson, A. and Young, F. (2004) Report on Evaluation of PIAD project. unpublished report for World Vision International. Tbilisi: World Vision InternationalnCarter, R. (2006) Family Matters. London: EveryChildnCostin, L.B., Karger, H.J., and Stoesz, D. (1996) The Politics of Child Abuse in America. New York: Oxford University PressnDachev, S., Simeonov, T., Hristova, T., and Mihailova, S. (2003) Take Me Home: Needs evaluation survey. Presentation for Save the Children Bulgaria. Sofia: Save the ChildrennDelegation of the European Commission in Romania (2005) Child Protection. Delegation of the European Commission in Romania: Romania [accessed from http://www.infoeuropa. ro/docs/Sector_fiche-Child_protection.pdf]nDPC (1998) Child Rights Protection System Reform Strategy Implementation Program (1998 - 2001). Bucharest: Department for Child Protection,nFergusin, H., 2004. Protecting Children in Time: Child abuse, child protection and the consequences of modernity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.nFox-Harding, L.M. (1997) Perspectives in Child Care Policy. London: LongmannGomart, E. (1998) Social Assessment of the Poorest of the Poor in Armenia. Washington DC : World Bank, Europe and Central Asia Region, Human Development Sector UnitnGordon, L. (1989) Heroes of their Own Lives: The politics and history of family violence, Boston 1870-1960. London: ViragonHarwin, J. (1996) Children of the Russian State, 1917-1995. Basingstoke: Avebury.nHerczog, M., Neményi, E., Wells, N. (2000) Routes and Reasons: Children entering and leaving institutional care in six CEE/CIS countries. Geneva: UNICEF Child Care ForumnHolman, B., (1988) Putting Families First: Prevention and childcare. London: Macmillan.nMilligan, I. (2006) Can we talk sense about fostering? Children Webmag http://www.childrenwebmag.com/content/view/127/'>[http://www.childrenwebmag.com/content/view/127/]nMomeu, L. (2000) Making choices to ensure family-centred outcomes: the Romania example.in Children Deprived of Parental Care: Rights and realities. Report of the Regional Conference, Budapest, Hungary, October 22-24, 2000. UNICEF Occasional Paper. New York: UNICEFnOliver, M. (1990) The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke: MacmillannRingold, D. (2000) Roma and the Transition in Central and Eastern Europe: Trends and challenges. Washington, DC: World BanknRooke, P.T. and Schnell, R.L. (1983) Discarding the Asylum: From child rescue to the welfare state in English Canada, 1800-1950. New York: University Press of America.nSACP (2003) Bulgaria Country Report. Sofia: Bulgarian State Agency for Child Protection [accessed from http://www.children-strategies.org/Englishcreports/BulgariaFinal.pdf'>http://www.children-strategies.org/Englishcreports/BulgariaFinal.pdfnSherrington, G. and Jeffery, C. (1998) Fairbridge: Empire and child migration. Essex, UK.: Woburn Press.nSwadener, B.B. and Lubek, S., (Eds.) (1995) Children and Families ‘At Promise’: Deconstructing the discourse of risk. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.nTobis, D. (2000) Moving from Residential Institutions to Community-based Social Services in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Washington, DC: World BanknUNICEF (2000) Children Deprived of Parental Care: Rights and realities. Report of the Regional Conference, Budapest, Hungary, October 22-24, 2000. New York: UNICEF Occasional Paper.nUNICEF (2001), A Decade of Transition.Regional Monitoring Report, No. 8. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research CentrenUNICEF (2004) Innocenti Social Monitor 2004. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research CentrenUNICEF (2005a) TransMonee 2005. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research CentrenUNICEF (2005b) Situation of child abandonment in Romania. Bucharest: UNICEFnWorld Bank (2001) Project Appraisal Document on a Proposed Loan in the Amount Of Euro 8.8 Million (US$ 8.0 Million Equivalent) to the Republic of Bulgaria for a Child Welfare Reform Project. Budapest: World Bank, Human Development Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region; Budapest [accessed on 25/06/2005 from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2001/03/08/000094946_01021705363340/Rendered/ PDF/multi_page.pdf[n