Clinical Supervision for mental health professionals

Authors

  • Edward White
  • Julie Winstanley

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v14i3.502

Keywords:

clinical supervision, evidence base, RCT, Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale, MCSS-26

Abstract

This article acknowledges an enduring debate about the nature of evidence and provides a context for the selective review of a literature on the outcomes of Clinical Supervision, a structured arrangement to support staff, which has been widely introduced into health service systems across the world. The literature revealed that many of the claims for the positive effects of CS have remained unsubstantiated. A contemporary pragmatic randomised controlled trial, summarised here, tested the relationships between Clinical Supervision, quality of care and patient outcomes, in mental health settings in Queensland, Australia. It confirmed that beneficial and sustainable CS outcomes accrued for Supervisors and Supervisees, as measured by a suite of research methods and instruments including The Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale©, and for patients in one private sector mental health facility. However, the effect Clinical Supervision had on nominated outcomes still remained difficult to demonstrate across a broad front. Plausible explanations are offered for this and a new framework for future outcomes-related research studies is suggested, in the continuing attempt to strengthen an empirical evidence base for Clinical Supervision.

References

Altman D and Bland M (1995) Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. <i>British Medical Journal</i>, 311, 485 (19 August)\nBambling M, King R, Raue P, Schweitzer R and Lambert W (2006) Clinical supervision: Its influence on client-rated working alliance and client symptom reduction in the brief treatment of major depression. <i>Psychotherapy Research</i>, 16, 317–331\nBradshaw T, Butterworth A and Mairs H (2007) Does structured clinical supervision during psychosocial intervention education enhance outcome for mental health nurses and the service users they work with? <i>Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing</i>, 14, 4–12\nButterworth T Carson J, Jeacock J, White E and Clements A (1999) Stress, coping, burnout and job satisfaction in British nurses: Findings from the Clinical Supervision Evaluation Project. <i>Stress Medicine</i>, 15, 27–33\nButterworth T, Bell L, Jackson C, and Majda P (2008) Wicked spell or magic bullet? A review of the clinical supervision literature 2001-2007. <i>Nurse Education Today</i>, 28, 3, 264-272\nButterworth T, Carson J, White E*, Jeacock J**, Clements A and Bishop V (1997) <i>Clinical Supervision and Mentorship. It is good to talk: An evaluation study in England and Scotland</i>. Final Report. Manchester: University of Manchester\nClarke L (1999) Nursing in search of a science: The rise and rise of the new nurse brutalism. <i>Mental Health Care</i>, 2, pp270-273.\nCochrane A (1972) Effectiveness and Efficiency: andom reflections on Health Services. London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust. Reprinted in 1989, in association with the <i>British Medical Journal</i>. Reprinted in 1999 for Nuffield Trust by the Royal Society of Medicine Press, London\nCreswell J, Fetters M and Ivankova N (2004) Designing a mixed methods study in Primary Care. <i>Annals of Family Medicine</i>, 2(1), 7-12\nEdwards D and Burnard P (2003) A systematic review of stress and stress management interventions for mental health nurses. <i>Journal of Advanced Nursing</i>, 42, 169-200\nEdwards D, Burnard P, Hannigan B, Cooper L, Adams J, Juggessur T and Fothergill A (2006) Clinical Supervision and burnout: The influence of Clinical Supervision for community mental health nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15, 8, 1007-1015\nEllis M and Ladany (1997) Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In: Watkins C (Ed.) <i>Handbook of Psychotherapy Supervision</i> (pp447-507). Wiley, New York\nEllis M, Ladany N, Krenggel M and Schult D (1996) Clinical Supervision research from 1981 to 1993: A methodological critique. <i>Journal of Counselling Psychology</i>, 28, 47-52\nFixsen D, Naoom S, Blase K, Friedman R and Wallace F (2005) Implementation Research: A synthesis of the literature. The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231). Tampa, Fl: Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.\nFreitas G (2002) The impact of psychotherapy supervision on client outcome: A critical examination of 2 decades of research. <i>Psychotherapy; Theory/Research/Practice/Training</i>, 39, 4, 354-367\nGreenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P and Kyriakidou O (2004) Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82, 4, 581-629\nHoffman L (1994) The training of psychotherapy Supervisors: A barren scape. <i>Psychotherapy in Private Practice</i>, 13, 1, 23-42\nHopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke M, Oxman A, Dickersin K (2009) Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. <i>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews</i>, Issue 1. Art. No: MR000006\nHyrkas K, Appleqvist-Schmidlechner and Paunonen-Ilmonen (2003) Translating and validating the Finnish version of the Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale. <i>Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences</i>, 17, 358-364\nKadushin A (1976) <i>Supervision in Social Work</i>. New York: Columbia University Press\nLawton-Smith S (2008) <i>Response to the publication of the Healthcare Commission’s review of NHS acute inpatient mental health services, ‘The Pathway to Recovery’</i>. News release 23 July 2008. Mental Health Foundation, London\nLeiter M and Harvie P (1996) Burnout among mental health workers: A review and a research agenda. <i>International Journal of Social Psychiatry</i>, 42, 2, 90-101\nMarsh C (1982) The survey method: The contribution of surveys to sociological explanation. London: George Unwin and Allen\nMilne D (2007) An empirical definition of clinical supervision. <i>British Journal of Clinical Psychology</i>, 46, 437-447\nMilne D (2009) <i>Evidence-based Clinical Supervision: Principles and practice</i>. Chichester: BPS/ Blackwell\nOakley A (1999) Paradigm wars: Some thoughts on a personal and public trajectory. <i>International Journal of Social Research Methodology</i>, 2, 3, 247-254\nOpen University (1998) <i>K509: Clinical Supervision: A development pack for nurses</i>. Milton Keynes : Open University Press,\nOxman A, Lombard C, Treweek S, Gagnier J, Maclure M and Zwarenstein M (2009) Why we will remain pragmatists: Four problems with the impractical mechanistic framework and a better solution. <i>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology</i>, 62, 485-488\nProctor B (1986) Supervision: A cooperative exercise in accountability. In: Enabling and Ensuring: Supervision in Practice (Eds: Marken M and Payne M) pp21-34. Leicester : National Youth Bureau and Council for Education and Training in Youth and Community Work,\nProctor B (2010) Review. Journal of Research in Nursing, 15, 2, 169-172\nProctor B and Inskipp F (2003) Group Supervision. In: Scaife J <i>et al</i> [Eds.] <i>Supervision in Clinical Practice: A practitioners guide</i>. 2<sup>nd</sup> Edition. London: Routledge\nRoxon N (2008) The Grace Groom Memorial Lecture (delivered by the Australian Federal Minister for Health and Ageing). 12 June. National Press Club, Canberra, Australia\nRycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Titchen A, Harvey G, Kitson A and McCormack B (2004) What counts as evidence in evidence-based practice? <i>Journal of Advanced Nursing</i>, 47, 1, 81-90\nSpence S, Wilson J, Kavanagh D, Strong J and Worrall L (2001) Clinical Supervision in four mental health professions: A review of the evidence. <i>Behaviour Change</i>, 18, 3, 135-155\nVon Elm E, Poglia G, Walder B, Tramèr M (2004) Different patterns of duplicate publication. An analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. <i>Journal of the American Medical Association</i>, 291, 974-980\nWang P, Lane M, Olfson M, Pincus H, Wells K and Kessler R (2005) Twelve-month use of mental health services in the United States: Results from the National Co-morbidity Survey Replication. <i>Archives of General Psychiatry</i>, 62, 629-640\nWatkins C E (2011) Does psychotherapy supervision contribute to patient outcomes? Considering 30 years of research. <i>The Clinical Supervisor</i>, 30, 2, 1-22\nWheeler S and Richards K (2007) The impact of clinical supervision on counsellors and therapists, their practice and their clients: A systematic review of the literature. <i>Counselling and Psychotherapy Research</i>, 7, 1, 54-65\nWhite E (1999) Personal communication. In: Winstanley J (2000) Clinical Supervision: Development of an evaluation instrument. Unpublished PhD thesis, p232. Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Manchester\nWhite E (2003a) The struggle for methodological orthodoxy in nursing research: The case of mental health. <i>International Journal of Mental Health Nursing</i>, 12, 88-95\nWhite E (2003b) Patient safety and staff support; the <i>sine qua non</i> of high quality mental health service provision. In: Treatment Protocol Project (2003). Acute Inpatient Psychiatric Care: A Source Book. World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for Evidence in Mental Health Policy. Chapter 13. Darlinghurst, New South Wales 2010, Australia\nWhite E (2011) Challenges which may arise when conducting real-life nursing research: An insight into practical issues. <i>Nurse Researcher: The International Journal of Research Methodology in Nursing and Health Care</i>. RCN Publishing Company, London (Accepted for publication; forthcoming)\nWhite E and Winstanley J (2009a) Implementation of Clinical Supervision: Educational preparation and subsequent diary accounts of the practicalities involved, from an Australian perspective. <i>Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing</i>, 16, 10, 895-903\nWhite E and Winstanley J (2009b) Clinical Supervision for nurses working in mental health settings in Queensland, Australia: A randomised controlled trial in progress and emerging challenges. <i>Journal of Research in Nursing</i>, 14, 3, 263-276\nWhite E and Winstanley J (2010a) Clinical Supervision: Outsider reports of a research-driven implementation program in Queensland, Australia. <i>Journal of Nursing Management</i>, 18, 689-696\nWhite E and Winstanley J (2010b) A randomised controlled trial of Clinical Supervision: Selected findings from a novel Australian attempt to establish the evidence base for causal relationships with quality of care and patient outcomes, as an informed contribution to mental health nursing practice development. <i>Journal of Research in Nursing</i>, 15, 2, 151-167\nWhite E, Butterworth T, Bishop, V. Carson J, Jeacock J and Clements A (1998) Clinical Supervision: Insider reports of a private world. <i>Journal of Advanced Nursing</i>, 28, 1, 185-192\nWhite E, Riley E, Davies S and Twinn S (1994) A detailed study of the relationships between support, supervision and role modelling for students in clinical areas, within the context of Project 2000 courses. English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, London.\nWinstanley J (2000) Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale<sup>©</sup>. <i>Nursing Standard</i>, 14, 19, 31-32\nWinstanley J and White E (2003) Clinical supervision: Models, measures and best practice. <i>Nurse Researcher: The International Journal of Research Methodology in Nursing and Health Care</i>, 10, 4, 7-38\nWinstanley J and White E (2011) The MCSS-26<sup>©</sup>: Revision of The Manchester Clinical Supervision Scale<sup>©</sup> using the Rasch Measurement Model. <i>Journal of Nursing Measurement</i>, 19, 3, 160-178\n

Downloads

Published

2012-12-20

How to Cite

White, E., & Winstanley, J. (2012). Clinical Supervision for mental health professionals. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 14(3), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v14i3.502

Issue

Section

Articles