‘We’ve stood on that precipice’


  • K. Maguire
  • P. Hodgson
  • K. Kamoche
  • M. Long
  • K. Love




culture, police, risk, child protection


UK police services constantly endure pressures to reduce spending and to reorganise in ways thought to be more efficient. In these moments of scrutiny, non-standard work practices become more noticeable. We report a study of a specialist unit, the Child Protection Unit (CPU), in one police service. In 2011, an initial exploratory interview with the unit head was followed by two discussion groups carried out with a three month gap between them. We found the unit existing and working dynamically between two forces: (a) the needs and expectations of society regarding child protection and (b) how more general expectations and needs regarding crime are normally met by the police service. While ‘traditional’ policing might see the offender successfully prosecuted, there can be deleterious effects on the victim. In consequence, CPU members are: more focused on and sensitive to the victim leading to a risk management philosophy; are more team-oriented with greater awareness of and sense of responsibility for each other; receive greater public support than other parts of the service. These differences result in the CPU members having non-standard organisational and operational work practices: they are less performance target-based; they investigate and prosecute a smaller number of cases; they use different documentation; they are not available to help with other work at times of greater general demand on the police service. Thus existing dynamically and anomalously, the unit’s very vulnerability that helps its members to do their difficult job also raises their profile and increases vulnerability to financial cuts. Their precipice in the title quotation is at several levels. We theorise our findings using contingency and cultural theories believing the findings relevant to other organisations with specialist units.


Bellaby, P. (1990a) To risk or not to risk? Uses and limitations of Mary Douglas on risk-acceptability for understanding health and safety at work and road accidents, <i>The Sociological Review</i>, V, 38, 3. 465-483\nBellaby, P. (1990b) ‘What is genuine sickness? The relation between work discipline and the sick role in a pottery factory. <i>Sociology of Health and Illness</i>, 12, 1, 47\nBellaby, P. (1999) <i>Sick Form Work: The body in employment, Aldershot</i>: Ashgate\nBellamy, C., 6 P., Raab C., Warren A., and Heeney C. (2008) Information sharing and confidentiality in social policy: Regulating multi-agency working. <i>Public Administration</i>, 86, 3. 737-759\nBloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., and Robson, K. (2001) <i>Focus Groups in Social Research</i>. London: Sage\nBrunsden, V., Hill, R., and Maguire, K. (2012) The impact of process issues on stress interventions in the emergency services. in C. Biron, M. Karanika-Murray, and C. Cooper (Eds.), <i>Improving Organisational Interventions for Stress and Well-being</i>. London: Routledge\nCohen, S., (1972) <i>Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The creation of the mods and rockers</i>' Oxford: Martin Robertson\nDonaldson, L. (2001) <i>The Contingency Theory of Organizations</i>' Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage\nDouglas, M. (1966) <i>Purity and Danger</i>. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul\nDouglas, M., (1970) <i>Natural Symbols</i>. London: Barrie and Jenkins\nDouglas, M., (1985) <i>Risk Acceptability according to the Social Sciences</i>. New York: Russel Sage Foundation\nDouglas, M. (1992) <i>Risk and Blame</i>. London: Routledge\nDouglas, M. and Wildavsky, A. (1982) <i>Risk and Culture</i>. Berkeley: University of California Press\nDowty, R. and Wallace, W. (2009) Implications of organizational culture for supply chain disruption. <i>International Journal of Production Economics</i>, 126, 57-65\nElliot, T.S. (1948) <i>Notes Towards a Definition of Culture</i>. London: Faber & Faber\nFord, C.L. and Airhihenbuwa C.O. (2010) The public health critical race methodology: Praxism for antiracism research. <i>Social Science and Medicine</i>, 7, 1 1390-1398\nFreud, S. (1979) <i>Civilization and its Discontents</i>. trans. J. Riveiere. London: The Hogarth Press (originally published 1930)\nGeertz, C. (1973/2000) <i>The Interpretation of Cultures</i>. New York: Basic Books\nHall, J. and Neitz, M. (1993) <i>Culture: Sociological perspectives</i>. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc\nHartley, J. (1994) Case studies in organisational research. in C. Cassel C. and G. Symon (Eds.) <i>Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research</i>. London: Sage\nHedberg, B.L.T., Nystrom, P., and Starbuck, W.H. (1976) Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. <i>Administrative Science Quarterly</i>, 21, 41-65\nHenwood, K.L. and Pidgeon, N.F. (1993) Qualitative Research and Psychological Theorizing. in Hammersley M., (ed) <i>Social Research: Philosophy, Politics and Practice</i>, London: Sage Publications Limited\nHoldaway, S. (1986) Police and social work relations: Problems and possibilities. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 16, 2. 137-160\nHollis, M. (1994) <i>The Philosophy of Social Science: An introduction</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press\nHome Office (2010) <i>Police Recorded Crime</i>. <a target="_blank" href='http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/science-research-statistics/research-statistics/crime-research/hosb1011/'>http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/science-research-statistics/research-statistics/crime-research/hosb1011/</a>\nLinsley, P. and Shrives, P. (2009) Mary Douglas, risk and accounting failures. <i>Critical Perspectives on Accounting</i>, 20, 4, 492-508\nMagee, B. (1973) <i>Popper</i>. Fontana Paperbacks, London\nMars, G. (1982) <i>Cheats at Work; An anthropology of workplace crime</i>. Aldershot: Ashgate\nMetropolitan Police (2012) <i>Child Protection</i>. <a target="_blank" href='http://content.met.police.uk/Site/childprotection'>http://content.met.police.uk/Site/childprotection</a>\nMunro, E. (2011) <i>The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final report. CM8062</i>, London: TSO\nNalbandian, J. and Klingner, D.E. (1980) Integrating context and decision strategy: A contingency theory approach to public personnel administration, <i>Administration and Society</i>, 12, 2, 178-20\nNSPCC (2011) <i>Prevalence and Incidence of Child Abuse and Neglect</i>: Key child protection statistics. <a target="_blank" href='http://www.nspcc.org.uk/inform/research/statistics/statistics_wda48748.html'>http://www.nspcc.org.uk/inform/research/statistics/statistics_wda48748.html</a>\nNSPCC (info@nspcc.org.uk) (2012) NSPCC enquiry: Statistics re Child Abuse, 30<sup>th</sup> January 2012. Email to Dr. Phil Hodgson (phillip.hodgson@ntu.ac.uk)\nParsons, T. (Ed.) (1964) <i>The Theory of Social and Economic Organization</i>: <i>Max Weber</i>. New York,: The Free Press. (Originally published in English in 1947)\nPerrow, C. (1970) <i>Organisational Analysis</i>. London: Tavistock Publications\nPerrow, C. (1972) <i>Complex Organisations</i>. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman\nPunch M. (1993) Observation and the Police: The research experience, in M. Hammersley (Ed.) <i>Social Research: Philosophy, politics and practice</i>. London: Sage\nReiner, R. (1985) <i>The Politics of the Police</i>. Brighton: Wheatsheaf\nRayner, S. (1986) Management of radiation hazards in hospitals: Plural rationalities in a single institution. <i>Social Studies of Science</i>, 16, 573-591\nSchofield, J.W. (1993) Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. in M. Hammersley (Ed.) <i>Social Research: Philosophy, Politics and Practice</i>,. London: Sage\nStrauss, A.L. (1987) <i>Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press\nThompson, M. (1992) The dynamics of cultural theory and their implications for the enterprise culture. in S.H. Heap and A. Ross (Eds.) <i>Understanding the Enterprise Culture</i>, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press\nWoodward, J. (1958) <i>Management and Technology</i>. London: HMSO\n




How to Cite

Maguire, K., Hodgson, P., Kamoche, K., Long, M., & Love, K. (2013). ‘We’ve stood on that precipice’. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 16(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v16i1.525