The benefits of combined (mixed) methods research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v16i2.532Keywords:
<i>combined (mixed) methods research</i>, <i>parenting programmes</i>, <i>evidence based interventions</i>Abstract
In this paper I argue for the importance of combined (mixed) methods studies when evaluating complex initiatives such as interventions. These studies combine quantitative and qualitative methods purposively, in order to capture a broader range of important variables than can be examined by either quantitative or qualitative methods alone. In essence, a combined methods study can address outcomes and outputs, and also provide evidence on the processes that are important to optimising success. A large scale Government funded initiative is used as an example. The Parenting Early Intervention Pathfinder introduced parenting programmes into 18 local authorities. Quantitative data showed the scale of the support, and the significant improvements made in parenting skills and mental well-being, and in child behaviour. Qualitative data explored the factors optimising successful implementation. The evidence from the study was used to inform the decision to roll out evidence-based parenting programmes across the whole of England.
References
Allen, G. (2011) <i>Early Intervention: The next steps. An independent report to Her Majesty’s government</i>. London\nArnold, D.H., O’Leary, S.G., Wolff, L.S., and Acker, M.M. (1993) The parenting scale: a measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. <i>Psychological Assessment</i>, 5, 137-144\nCullen, S., Cullen, M. A., Lindsay, G., and Strand, S. (2012) The Parenting Early Intervention Programme in England 2006-11: A classed experience? <i>British Educational Research Journal</i>. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00084.x\nGlogowska, M. (2011) Paradigms, pragmatism and possibilities: mixed-methods research in speech and language therapy. <i>International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders</i>, 46<i>, 3</i>, 251-260\nGoodman, R. (1997) The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. <i>Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</i>, 38, 581-586\nGreen, H.,McGinnity, A., Meltzer, H., Ford, T., and Goodman, R. (2005) <i>The Mental Health of Children and Young People in Great Britain, 2004</i>. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan\nIrvine, A.B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., and Ary, D. V. (1999) The value of the parenting scale for measuring the discipline practices of parents of middle school children. <i>Behavior Research and Therapy</i>, 37, 127-142\nJohnston, C.,and Mash, E.J. (1989) A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. <i>Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18</i>, 167-175\nLaw, J., Lee, W., Roulstone, S., Wren, Y., Zeng, B., and Lindsay, G. (2012) <i>‘What works’: Interventions for children and young people with speech, language and communication needs</i>. London: DfE [http://www.education.gov.uk/researchandstatistics/research/better] <a target="_blank" href='http://www.education.gov.uk/researchandstatistics/research/better'>http://www.education.gov.uk/researchandstatistics/research/better</a>\nLeech, N.L. and Onwuegbuzie (2009) A typology of mixed methods research designs. <i>Qualitative and Quantitative</i>, 43, 265-275\nLindsay, G., Band, S., Cullen, M.A., and Cullen, S. (2007a) <i>Evaluation of the parenting early intervention pathfinder: Additional study of the involvement of extended schools. DCSF-RW035</i>. London: DCSF. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/DCSF-RW036.pdf <a target="_blank" href='http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/DCSF-RW036.pdf'>http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/DCSF-RW036.pdf</a>\nLindsay, G., Band, S., Cullen, M.A., Cullen, S., Davis, L., Davis, H., Evans, R., Stewart-Brown, S., Strand, S., and Hasluck, C. (2007b) <i>Parent support adviser pilot: First interim report from the evaluation DCSF-RW020</i>. London: DCSF. http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/research/data/ uploadfiles/DCSF-RW020.pdf <a target="_blank" href='http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/DCSF-RW020.pdf'>http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/DCSF-RW020.pdf</a>\nLindsay, G., Cullen, S. and Wellings, C (2011) <i>Bringing families and schools together: Giving children in high poverty areas the best start at school</i>. London: Save the Children.http:// www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/docs/Bringing%20Families%20 and%20Schools%20Together.pdf <a target="_blank" href='http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/docs/Bringing%20Families%20 and%20Schools%20Together.pdf'>http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/docs/Bringing%20Families%20 and%20Schools%20Together.pdf</a>\nLindsay, G., Davis, H., Strand, S., Band, S., Cullen, M.A., Cullen, S., Hasluck, C., Evans, R., and Stewart-Brown, S. (2008) <i>Parenting early intervention pathfinder evaluation DCSF-RW054</i>. <a target="_blank" href='https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationdetail/page1/DCSF-RW054'>https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationdetail/ page1/DCSF-RW054</a>\nLindsay, G. Strand, S., Cullen, M.A., Cullen, S., Band, S., Davis, H., Conlon, G., Barlow, J., and Evans, R. (2011) <i>Parenting Early Intervention Programme evaluation</i>. DFE-RR121A. London: DfE [https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DFE-RR121A.pdf] <a target="_blank" href='https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DFE-RR121A.pdf'>https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DFE-RR121A.pdf</a>\nLindsay, G., Strand, S. and Davis, H. (2011) A comparison of the effectiveness of three parenting programmes in improving parenting skills, parent mental well-being and children’s behaviour when implemented on a large scale in community settings in 18 English local authorities: The Parenting Early Intervention Pathfinder (PEIP), <i>BMC Public Health</i> 2011, 11:962 doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-962. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2458-11-962.pdf <a target="_blank" href='http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2458-11-962.pdf'>http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2458-11-962.pdf</a>\nMoran, P., Ghate, D., van der Werwe, A. (2004) <i>What Works in Parenting Support? A review of the international literature</i>. Research Report 574. London: Department for Education and Skills\nNowak, C., Heinrichs, N. (2008) A comprehensive meta-analysis of Triple P—Positive Parenting Program using hierarchical linear modelling: Effectiveness and moderating variable. <i>Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review</i>, 11, 114-144\nO’Mara, A., Jamal, F., Llewellyn, A., Lehmann, A., Martin, A., Cooper, C., and Bergerm, (2011) <i>The impact of parenting and family support strategies on children and young people’s outcomes</i>. London: Centre for Excellent and Outcomes in Children and Young People (C4EO)\nPatterson, J., Mockford, C., Barlow, J., Pyper, C., Stewart-Brown, S. (2002) Need and demand for parenting programmes in general practice. <i>Archives of Diseases in Childhood</i>, 87, 468-487\nRespect Taskforce. (2006) <i>Respect Action Plan</i>. London: Home Office\nSanders M. (1999) The Triple P—Positive Parenting Program: towards an empirically validated multilevel parenting and family support strategy for the prevention of behavior and emotional problems in children. <i>Clinical Child and Family Psychology Development</i>, 2, 71-90\nSteele, M., Marigna, M., Tello, J., and Johnston, R. (2000) <i>Strengthening Families, Strengthening Communities: an Inclusive Programme. Facilitator Manual</i>. London: Race Equality Unit\nTennant, R., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., and Stewart-Brown, S. (2006) <i>Monitoring Positive Mental Health in Scotland: Validating the Affectometer 2 Scale and Developing the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale for the UK</i>. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland\nUnited Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2010) <i>Compilation of Evidence-Based Family Skills Training Programmes</i>. New York: United Nations\nWebster-Stratton, C., and Reid, M. (2003) The incredible years parents, teachers and child training series: A multifaceted treatment approach for young children with conduct problems. in A. Kazdin and J. Weisz (Eds.) <i>Evidence-based Psychotherapies for Children and Adolescents</i>. New York: Guilford\n
Published
2013-04-11
How to Cite
Lindsay, G. (2013). The benefits of combined (mixed) methods research. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 16(2), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v16i2.532
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright lies with the journal. Enquiries regarding reproduction should be sent in the first place to enquiries@whitingbirch.net
