Multi-agency child protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v16i3.536Keywords:
<i>inter-agency child protection</i>, <i>child abuse</i>, <i>risk assessment</i>Abstract
Public concern over, and recent developments in, the field of child protection are well known (Munro 2012). Within these developments, there has been a strengthening of the role of social work with an increased focus on, and recognition of, professional knowledge, skills and ‘expert’ decision making (Munro 2011; Gilbert et al. 2011). Focus on inter-professional and multi-agency practice has developed alongside (Frost and Lloyd 2006; Frost and Robinson 2007; Ruch 2009), and continues to have a clear focus in the recently issued Working Together to Safeguard Children (H.M. Government 2013).
This paper enquires into a relatively under-explored area of multi-agency child protection practice, specifically, that of the police (that is,. non-specialists in child protection) making an urgent, first response to a child protection call, often out of hours and without immediate recourse to the expertise and knowledge of child protection practitioners. In these situations, the police are called upon to make key decisions: for example, whether to immediately protect and remove children using police protection powers (Section 46(1) Children Act 1989), to refer on to local authority social services for a s47 investigation or s17 services, or to take no further action. There is exploration of the issues raised by a request from the police to develop an assessment framework as an aid to practice in these situations. The police had in mind an equivalent instrument to a domestic abuse framework already adopted by them. The paper reviews debates, particularly about predictive efficacy, in the construction of assessment and decision-making tools. The nature and distinction between consensus based and actuarial risk assessment instruments are examined, as are challenges for general multi-agency working, alongside the specific challenges for front line police officers. It is proposed that a consensus based assessment framework to support decision making, drawing on empirically tested, actuarially informed risk assessment evidence, which is collaboratively tested with a multi-agency group, is indicated.
References
Anderson, S. (2005) Inter-agency information sharing in health and social services: The role of professional culture. <i>British Journal of Social</i> Work, 36, 657-669\nBaird, C., Wagner, D., Caskey, R., and Neuenfeldt, D. (1995) <i>The Michigan Department of Social Services Structured Decision Making System: An evaluation of its impact on child protection services. The highlights</i>. Madison, WI: Children’s Research Center\nBaird, C. and Wagner, D. (2000) The relative validity of actuarial and consensus-based risk assessment systems. <i>Children and Youth Services Review</i>. Vol. 22, Nos. 11/12, pp. 839-871\nBaumann, D., Randolph Law, J., Sheets, J., Reid, G. and Graham, J.C. (2005) Evaluating the effectiveness of actuarial risk assessment models. <i>Children and Youth Services Review</i>, 27, 465-490\nBolland, K. and Atherton, C. (1999) Chaos Theory: An alternative approach to social work practice and research, <i>Families in Society</i>, 80, 4, 367-373\nBrandon, M., Bailey, S., and Belderson, P. (2010) <i>Building on the Learning from Serious Case Reviews: A two year analysis of child protection database notifications 2007-2009</i>. DfE Research Brief RB040. London, Department for Education\nBrandon, M., Bailey, S. and Belderson, P. (2011) <i>Child and Family Practitioners Understanding of Child Development: Lessons learnt from a small sample of serious case reviews</i>. DfE Report RR110. London: Department for Education\nBroadhurst, K., Wastell, D., White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Thompson, K., Pithouse, A., and Davey D. (2010) Performing ‘initial assessment’: Identifying the latent conditions for error at the front-door of local authority children’s services. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 40, 352-370\nBronfenbrenner, U. (1979) <i>The Ecology of Human behaviour</i>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press\nButz, M.R., Chamberlain, L.L and McCown, W.C. (1997) <i>Strange Attractors: Chaos, complexity and the art of family therapy</i>. New York: John Wile\nCash, S. (2001) Risk assessment in child welfare:Tthe art and the science. <i>Children and Youth Services Review</i>, 23, 11, 81l-830\nCooper, H., Braye, S. and Geyer, R. (2004) Complexity and inter-professional education. <i>Learning in Health and Social Care</i>, 3, 4, 179-189\nDepartment for Education (2010) <i>Working Together to Safeguard Children</i>. London, DfE\nDepartment of Health (2000) <i>Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families</i>. London: DoH\nDrury-Hudson, J. (1999) Decision-making in child protection: The use of empirical and procedural knowledge by novices and experts and implications for fieldwork placement. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 29, 147-169\nFrost, N. and Lloyd, A. (2006) Implementing multi-disciplinary teamwork in the new child welfare policy environment. <i>Journal of Integrated Care</i>, 14, 2, 11-17\nFrost, N. and Robinson, M. (2007), Joining up children’s services: safeguarding children in multi-disciplinary teams. <i>Child Abuse Rev</i>iew, 16, 184-199\nGambrill, E. and Schlonsky, A. (2001) The Assessment and management of risk in child welfare services, <i>Children and Youth Services Review</i>, 23, 1, 1-22\nGarrett, P.M. (2003) Swimming with dolphins:The assessment framework, New Labour, and the instruments for social work with children and families. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 33, 441-463\nGilbert, N., Parton, N., and Skiveness, M. (Eds.) (2011), <i>Child Protection Systems: Trends and Orientations</i>. New York: Oxford University Press\nGillingham, P. (2006) Risk assessment in child protection: Problem rather than solution. <i>Australian Social Work</i>, 59, 1, 354-377\nGillingham, P. and Humphries, C. (2009) Child protection practitioners and decision-making instruments: Observations from the front line. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 40 2598-2616\nHaynes, P. (2008) Complexity theory and evaluation in public management: A qualitative systems approach. <i>Public Management Review</i>. 10, 3, 401-419\nH.M. Government (2013) <i>Working Together to Safeguard Children. A guide to inter agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of Children</i>. London: HM Government\nHeron, J. and Reason, P. (2001) The practice of co-operative enquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. in, P. Reason and H. Bradbury (Eds.) <i>Handbook of Action Research</i>: <i>Participation, enquiry and practice</i>. London: Sage (pp. 170-188)\nHoffman, R. (2008) Exploring the link between uncertainty and organising processes: Complexity science insights for communication scholars. <i>Communication Theory</i>, 18, 426-447\nHouchin, K. and MacLean, D. (2005) Complexity theory and strategic change: An empirically informed critique. <i>British Journal of Management</i>, 16, 149-166\nHouston, S. and Griffiths, H. (2000) Reflections on risk in child protection: is it time for a shift in paradigms? <i>Child & Family Social Work</i>, 5, 1-10\nJohnson, W. (2006) The risk assessment wars: A commentary: response to evaluating the effectiveness of actuarial risk assessment models. <i>Children and Youth Services Review</i>, 28 704-714\nJohnson, W. and L’Esperance, J. (1984) Predicting the recurrence of child abuse. <i>Social Work Research and Abstracts</i>. 29, 21–26\nKahn, J. and Schwalb, E.C. (2010) The timing to and risk factors associated with child welfare system recidivism at two decision-making points. <i>Child and Youth Services Review</i>, 32, 7, 1035-1044\nLaming, H.L (Lord). (2003) <i>Report of the Inquiry into the Death of Victoria Climbié</i>. London: Department of Health\nLee, S.J., Guterman, N.B., and Lee, Y. (2008) Risk factors for paternal physical child abuse. <i>Child Abuse and Neglect</i>. 32, 846-858\nLevenson, J.S and Morin, J.W. (2006) Risk assessment in child sexual abuse cases. <i>Child Welfare</i>, 85, 1, 59-82\nLyle, G. and Graham, E. (2000) Looks can be deceiving: Using a risk assessment instrument to evaluate the outcomes of child protection services. <i>Children and Youth Services Review</i>, 22, 11-12, 935-949\nMarks-Tarlow, T. (2008) <i>Psyche’s Veil: Psychotherapy, fractals and complexity</i>. London: Routledge\nMurphy, M. (2004) <i>Developing Collaborative Relationships in Inter-Agency Child Protection</i>. Lyme Regis: Russell House\nMenzies Lyth, I. (1959) The functions of social systems as a defense against anxiety: A report on a study of a nursing service of a general hospital. <i>Human Relations</i>, 13, 95-121\nMunro, E. (2011) <i>The Munro Review of Child Protection, Final Repor</i>t. London: The Stationery Office Ltd\nMunro, E. (2012) <i>The Munro Review of Child Protection: Progress Report: Moving towards a child centred system</i>. London: Department for Education\nNorris, D. (1990) <i>Violence Against Social Workers: The implications for practice</i>. London, Jessica Kingsley\nParton, N. (1998) Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 28, 5-27\nParton, N. (2011) Child protection and safeguarding in England: Changing and competing conceptions of risk and their implications for social work. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 41, 854-875\nRuch G. (2009) Ed. <i>Post-Qualifying Child Care Social Work: Developing reflective practice</i>. London, Sage\nSchwalbe, C. (2008) Strengthening the integration of actuarial risk assessment with clinical judgment in an evidence based practice framework. <i>Children and Youth Services Review</i> 30, 1458–1464\nShlonsky, A. And Wagner, D. (2005) The next step: integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management. <i>Children and Youth Services Review</i>, 27, 409–427\nShlonsky, A. (2007). Initial construction of an actuarial risk assessment measure using the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW). in, F. Wulczyn, and R. Haskins (Eds) <i>Child Protection: Using research to improve policy and practice</i>. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution\nSidebottom, P., Brandon, M., Powell, C., Solebo, C., Koistenen, J. and Ellis, C. (2010) <i>Learning from Serious Case Reviews. Report of a research study on the methods of learning lessons nationally from serious case reviews</i>. DfE Research Report RBO 37. London: Department of Education\nSpratt, T. (2000), Decision-making by senior social worker at first point of referral. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 30, 597-613\nStevens I. and Hassett P. (2007) Applying complexity theory to risk in child protection practice. <i>Childhood</i>, 14, 1, 128-144\nStevens, I. and Cox, P. (2008) Complexity theory: Developing new understandings of child protection in field settings and in residential child care. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 38, 1320-1336\nStroud, J. (2008) A psychosocial analysis of child homicide. <i>Critical Social Policy</i>. 28, 4, 482-505\nStroud, J. (2011) The death of a child: The unavoidable truth. In, T. Okitikpi (Ed.) <i>Social Control and the Use of Power in Social Work with Children and Families</i>. Lyme Regis: Russell House\nWald, M.S. & Woolverton, M., (1990). Risk assessment: the emperor’s new clothes? <i>Child Welfare</i>. 64, 6, 483-511\nWarren-Adamson, C. (2009a) Every Child Matters: The context for inter-professional and Inter-agency practice. In, G. Ruch (Ed.) <i>Post Qualifying Child Care Social Work: Developing reflective practice</i>. London, Sage (pp. 41-48)\nWarren-Adamson, C. (2009b) Collaborative practice and its complexity. in. G. Ruch (Ed.) <i>Post Qualifying Child Care Social Work: Developing reflective practice</i>. London: Sage (pp. 132-150)\nWaterhouse L. and Carnie J. (1991) Social work and police response to child sexual abuse in Scotland. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 21 373-279\nWoods, D., Dekker, S., Cook, R., Jophanese, L., and Sarter N. (2010), <i>Behind Human Error</i>. Farnham: Ashgate\n
Published
2013-08-16
How to Cite
Stroud, J., & Warren-Adamson, C. (2013). Multi-agency child protection. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 16(3), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v16i3.536
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright lies with the journal. Enquiries regarding reproduction should be sent in the first place to enquiries@whitingbirch.net
