Participation and coping


  • Rita Elisabeth Eriksen



<i>participation</i>, <i>coping</i>, <i>service users</i>, <i>constructed analytical framework</i>


What implications might an understanding of a mutual dependence between the concepts of participation and coping have for professional engagement with service users? This article presents why participation is central to peoples’ lives and how service user coping with and personal participating in everyday life might be understood. Service users have access to personal and environmental resources and want to manage their everyday life as much as possible. To be able to cope they have to participate. An analytical framework was developed as a result of a study based on qualitative interviews with service users in Norway. A framework was constructed to explore how the service users participated and coped with their everyday life – both on an individual level and through interactions with their environment. This framework emerged from preliminary analysis and was then used in further analysis of the data. The study showed that professionals would be advised to build on the participation and coping that service users had established in their daily life as citizens as well as people using social services. Some service users expressed that the more social contexts they participated in, the better they experienced their coping.


Antonovsky, A. (1987) <i>Unraveling the Mystery of Health</i>. San Francisco: Jossey Bass\nBailey, D. (2012) <i>Interdisciplinary Working in Mental Health</i>. Palgrave Macmillan.\nBarker, R. (2004) <i>The Social Work Dictionary</i>. Washington: NASW\nCovington, M. and Beery, R. (1976) <i>Self-Worth and School Learning</i>. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston\nEriksen, R.E. (2007) <i>The Everyday Life of Service Users: Coping in a (user)perspective</i>. Thesis. Trondheim: NTNU\nEriksen, R.E. (2012) The Coping Model: what is it and what might be its implications for social work practice? <i>The European Journal of Social Work</i>, 1, 1-17\nEriksen, R E., Brottveit, Å. and Døhlie, E. (2003) <i>Users’ Evaluations of the Social Services</i>. Oslo: Dept. of Social Services and Diakonhjemmet University College\nEspvall, M. (2008) From obligations to negotiations: Reciprocity and reflexivity in informal financial support. <i>The European journal of social work</i>, 11, 4, 355-367\nFolkman, S. and Moskowitz, J. (2004) Coping: pitfalls and promises. <i>Annual Review of Psychology</i>, 55, 745-774\nFook, J. (2002) <i>Social work: Critical theory and practice</i>. London: Sage\nFreire, P. (1972) <i>Pedagogy of the Oppressed</i>. New York: Continuum\nHamilton, K. and Catterall, M. (2006) Transition into poverty. <i>The Marketing Review</i> 6, 2, 123-136.\nHarsløf, I. and Seim, S. (2008) <i>The Dynamics Of Poverty</i>. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.\nHøilund, P. and Juul, S. (2005) <i>Acknowledgement and Power of Judgement in Social Work</i>. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels\nJenssen, A.G. (2009) <i>User Participation in Social Services</i>. Thesis. Trondheim: NTNU\nKvale, S. (2008) <i>Doing Interviews</i>. London: Sage\nLazarus, R. and Folkman, S. (1984) <i>Stress, Appraisal and Coping</i>. New York: Springer\nMaluccio, A. (1979) <i>Learning from Clients</i>. New York: The Free Press\nMalterud, K. (2011) <i>Qualitative Methods in Medical Research</i>. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget\nQualitative Service Research International(QSR), (2002 July) NVivo, (3.ed.)(Computer Software), Melbourne\nRønning, R. and Solheim, L. (1998) <i>Help Based on its Own Premises?</i> Oslo: Kommuneforlaget\nSaleebey, D. (2006) <i>The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice</i>. Boston: Pearson\nSchwandt, T. and Halpern, E. (1988) <i>Linking Auditing and Metaevaluation: Enhancing quality in applied research</i>. Newbury Park: Sage\nShulman, L. (2008) <i>The Skills of Helping Individuals, Families, Groups and Communities</i>. Belmont: Brooks/Cole\nThe Directorate of Health and Social Affairs (2005a) <i>National Strategy for Quality-Improvement 2005-2015</i>. IS-1162. Oslo\nThe Directorate of Health and Social Affairs (2005b) <i>Use of, Attitudes to and Need for Knowledge in the Social Services</i>. IS-0153. Oslo\nThoits, P. (1995) Stress, coping and social support processes. <i>Journal of Health and Social Behavior</i>, Extra Issue, 53-79\nUggerhøj, L. (1995) <i>Help or Dependence</i>. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag\nUnderlid, K. (2005) <i>The Psychology of Poverty</i>. Oslo: Samlaget\n




How to Cite

Eriksen, R. E. (2013). Participation and coping. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 17(1), 22-34.