Mixed methods evaluation of a menu of research learning opportunities for mid‑career social work academics with ‘protected time’

Lynn McDonald; Claudia Bernard; Donald Forrester; Sue White; David Shemmings

doi:10.1921/swssr.v15i3.829

Authors

Lynn McDonald Middlesex University
Claudia Bernard Goldsmiths College
Donald Forrester University of Bedfordshire
Sue White University of Birmingham
David Shemmings University of Kent

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v15i3.829

Abstract

Abstract: Knowledge about research methodologies and positive attitudes about research are each essential for academics who teach social worker students to advocate for and to deliver effective, empowering services to vulnerable people. This paper evaluates a menu of learning opportunities offered to fifty-two mid-career social work academics from 30 UK universities given ‘protected time’ to increase their research skills, funded by RDI4-ESRC. Qualitative and quantitative survey data are summarized. All participants attended five of eight conference days on research methodologies; 80% participated in small discussion groups; 49% attended a 3-day writing retreat; 49% signed up to a research mini-placement; 31% presented research at a conference; 21% submitted manuscripts to a journal. The demonstrated commitment of time, expertise, and advanced skills to this project from 32 senior social science/social work researchers came at a time when media was blasting the profession. They modelled enthusiasm and confidence and ‘bridged’ access for the ‘next generation’ of academics. Repeated encounters amongst the participants gradually built ‘bonded’ social capital ‘normed’ positively around the enterprise of research. Participants reported at follow-up increased knowledge and confidence as they teach... In the current economic context, there are benefits of ‘protected time’ combined with structured opportunities for mid-career social work academics.

Author Biographies

Lynn McDonald, Middlesex University

Professor, Dept of Mental Health, Social Work and Interprofessional Learning

Claudia Bernard, Goldsmiths College

Senior Lecturer in Social Work

Donald Forrester, University of Bedfordshire

Professor of Social Work Research

Sue White, University of Birmingham

Professor of Social Work (Children and Families)

David Shemmings, University of Kent

Professor of Social Work

References

Beresford, P. (2001) Service users and research. Research Matters, (April/October), 57-60.

Brannen, J. (2005) ‘The entry of qualitative and quantitative approaches into the research process’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 3.

Bryman, A (2007) Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 8-22.

Cozolino, L. (2006) The Neuroscience of Human Relationships: Attachment and the developing social brain. London: W.W. Norton

Fisher, M. and Marsh, P. (2003) Social work research and the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise: An initial overview. Social Work Education 22, 1, 71-80.

Fox, M., Martin, P., and Green G. (2007) Doing Practitioner Research. London: Sage

Freire, P. (1995). Pedagogy of Hope: Reliving Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.

Gerhardt, S. (2005) Why Love Matters. Londn: Brunner-Routledge

Henderson, P. and Thomas, D. (2002) Skills in Neighbourhood Work. (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge

JUCSWEC (2006) A Social Work Research Strategy in Higher Education: 2006-2020, Joint Universities Council for Social Work Education Committee’s Research Sub-Committee [accessed at http://www.swap.ac.uk/research/strategy.asp

International Federation of Social Work (2000) Definition of Social Work at:

http://ifsw.org/policies/definition-of-social-work/

McDonald, L., Fitzroy, S., Fuchs, I., Fooken, I., and Klasen, H. (2012). Strategies for high retention rates of low-income families in FAST (Families and Schools Together): An evidence-based parenting programme in the USA, UK, Holland and Germany. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 1, 75-88.

Macdonald, G. (2003) Using Systematic Reviews to Improve Social Care, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence

Mills (2006) Demographic Review of the UK Social Sciences. Swindon: ESRC.

Orme, J. (2003). Why does social work need doctors? Social Work Education 22, 3, 541-554

Orme, J. and J. Powell (2005) Research Strategy for JUC SWEC: Building Research Capacity: Student Training and Staff Development. London: King’s College, Social Care Workforce Research Unit

Payne, M. (2005). Modern Social Work Theory. Adershot: Palgrave Macmillan

Putnam, R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The collapse and Revival of American community. New York: Simon & Shuster

Saracostti, M., (2007) Social capital as a strategy to overcome poverty in Latin America: An overview. International Social Work. 50, 515-532

Shaw, I. & Norton, M. (2006) The Kinds and Quality of Social Work Research in UK Universities, York: University of York.

Shaw, I., Briar-Lawson, K., Orme, J. and Ruckdeschel, R.( Eds.) (2010) The Sage Handbook of Social Work Research. New York: Sage

Shemmings, D. (2006) ‘Quantifying’ qualitative data: An illustrative example of the use of Q methodology in psychosocial research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, 147-165.

Soydan, H. (2010) Politics and values in social work research. in I. Shaw, K. Briar-Lawson, J. Orme, and R. Ruckdeschel (Eds.) The Sage Handbook of Social Work Research. New York: Sage (pp. 130-148)

Terrion. (2006) Building social capital in vulnerable families: Success markers of a school‑based intervention program. Youth and Society. 38, 2, 155-176

Werner, E.E. and Smith, R.S. (1992) Overcoming the Odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Cornell, NY: Cornell University Press

Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K. (2009) The Spirit Level: Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin Books