Evaluation of the involvement of service users in post-qualifying social work education: Expected and unexpected results
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v15i3.831Abstract
There is a long policy and tradition of service users being involved in the education of social work students and post-qualifying candidates, and they are recognised as educators in their own right, however there appears to have been limited measurement of the impact of service user educator involvement in post-qualifying education on practice, and ultimately on outcomes for end service users. A collaborative partnership between service user educators, practitioners and academics carried out research in this area in four local authorities in the English East Midlands (Equally Experienced Research Group, 2011); whilst it was found that direct service user educator input had a positive impact on candidates’ practice, some unexpected and somewhat surprising responses arose. Interviews with candidates’ line managers identified that there appeared to be significantly less active evaluation of outcomes for service users than we had assumed would be the case.This paper initially sets the context for considering these responses by outlining the research undertaken, and considering how post-qualifying education as a whole might be evaluated as making a difference to practice. The second part of the paper looks at wider issues of evaluating practice and organisational service delivery. Methods used for measuring service user outcomes will be considered, alongside consideration of the active participation of service users in developing individual practice and agency service provision.
References
Arnstein, S. R.(1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, 4, 216-224
Ayres, S. (2010) Undertaking an Audit And Evaluation of PQ in Six London Local Authorities. London: Skills for Care
Bailey, D. (2002) Training together, part two: The evaluation of a shared learning programme on dual diagnosis for specialist drugs workers and Approved Social Workers (ASWs). Social Work Education, 21, 685–699
Balman, M.(2007) Developing and Delivering the New PQ framework: Involving people who use services and carers, Leeds: Skills for Care
Barnes, C., and Mercer, G. (2003) Research Review on User Involvement in Promoting Change and Enhancing the Quality of Social Care’ Services for Disabled People, Centre for Disability Studies, University of Leeds
Bogolub, E. (2010) The Obligation to bring about Good in Social Work Research: A New Perspective, Qualitative Social Work 9, 9, 9-15
Brown, K., & Rutter, L. (2006) Critical Thinking for Social Work, Exeter: Learning Matters
Brown, K., and Young, N. (2008) Building Capacity for Service User and Carer Involvement in Social Work Education. Social Work Education, 27, 1, 84–96
Brown, K., McCloskey, C., Galpin, D., Keen, S., Immins, T. (2008) Evaluating the impact of post-qualifying social work education. Social Work Education, 27, 8, 853–867
Carpenter, J. (2005) Evaluating Outcomes in Social Work Education. Discussion Paper No.1. London and Dundee: Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) & Scottish Institute for Excellence in Social Work Education (SIESWE).
Carpenter, J. (2011) Evaluating Social Work Education: A Review of Outcomes, Measures, Research Designs and Practicalities. Social Work Education, 30, 2, 122–140
Carr, S. (2004) Has Service User Participation Made a Difference to Social Care Services? SCIE Position Paper 3. London: SCIE/Policy Press
Chapman, A. (2009) Donald Kirkpatrick’s Learning Evaluation Model 1959 (online) at http://www.businessballs.com/kirkpatricklearningevaluationmodel.htm (Accessed 1 February 2012)
Denzin, N. (1970) The Research Art in Sociology, London: Butterworths
Denzin, N. (1978) Sociological Methods: a sourcebook (2nd edition), New York: McGraw-Hill
Doel, M., Carroll, C., Chambers E., Cooke, T., Hollows, A. Laurie, L. & Nancarrow, S. (2007) Developing measures for effective service user and carer participation. SCIE Stakeholder Participation Position Paper. London: SCIE
Equally Experienced Research Group (2011) The Involvement Of Service-Users In Post Qualifying Childcare Teaching and Learning: Does It Make A Difference? Nottingham: Nottingham Trent University
Forrester, D., McCambridge, J., Waissbein, C., Emlyn-Jones, R. and Rollnick, S. (2008a) Child Risk and Parental Resistance: Can Motivational Interviewing Improve the Practice of Child and Family Social Workers in Working with Parental Alcohol Misuse?. British Journal of Social Work, 38, 1302-1319
Forrester, D., McCambridge, J., Waissbein, C. and Rollnick, S. (2008b) How do child and family social workers talk to parents about child welfare concerns?. Child Abuse Review, 17, 1, 23-35
General Social Care Council, 2005, Working towards full participation, (online) www.gscc.org.uk/publications (accessed 20/5/2009).
General Social Care Council (2009) Post Qualifying Framework for Social Work Education and Training, London: GSCC
General Social Care Council (2010) Raising Standards: Social work education in England 2008-09, London: GSCC
Gutteridge,R., and Dobbins, K (2010) Service user and carer involvement in learning and teaching: A faculty of health staff perspective. Nurse Education Today, 30, 6, 509-514
Hart, E., and Bond, M. (1995) Action Research for Health and Social Care: A guide to practice.Open University Press: Buckingham
Higham, P. (2009) Post Qualifying Social Work Practice, Sage: London.
Kazi, M. (2003) Realist Evaluation in Practice. British Journal of Social Work, 33, 803-818
Lathlean, J., Burgess, A., Coldham, T., Gibson, C., Herbert, L., Levett-Jones, T., Simons, L. and Tee, S. (2006) Experiences of service user and carer participation in health care education. Nurse Education Today, 26, 8, 732–737
Levin, E. (2004) Involving Service Users and Carers in Social Work Education, London, Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE)
Matka, E., River, D., Littlechild, R. and Powell, T. (2009) Involving Service Users and Carers in Admissions for Courses in Social Work and Clinical Psychology: Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of Practices at the University of Birmingham. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 7, 2137-2154
Maxwell, N., Scourfield, J., Gould, N., Huxley, P. (2012) UK panel data on social work service users. British Journal of Social Work. 42, 165–184. Advance Access publication April 27, 2011
Morrison, T. (2005) Staff Supervision in Social Care: Making a real difference for staff and service users. (3rd Ed). Brighton: Pavilion
Munro, E. (2004) The Impact of Audit on Social Work Practice. British Journal of Social Work 34, 1075-1095
Munro, E. (2011) The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report – A child-centred system. London: Department for Education
Powell, J. and Orme, J. (2011) Increasing the Confidence and Competence of Social Work Researchers: What Works? British Journal of Social Work 41, 1566–1585 Advance Access publication March 19, 2011
Preston-Shoot, M. (2005) Demonstrating Quality in Post Qualifying Education’. Contact News and Views, GLPQETC: London. (pp.8-9)
Shaping Our Lives (SOL), (2007) Developing social Care: Service users driving culture change, London, SCIE
Stickley, T., Stacey, G., Smith, A., Betinis, J., Pollock, K. and Fairbank, S. (2011) Developing a service user designed tool for the assessment of student mental health nurses in practice: A collaborative process. Nurse Education Today, 31, 1, 102-106
Taylor, C. and White, S. (2006) Knowledge and reasoning in social work: Educating for humane judgement, British Journal of Social Work, 36, 937–954
Trevithick, P. (2008) Revisiting the knowledge base of social work: A framework for practice. British Journal of Social Work 38, 1212-1237
Yip, K.-S. (2006) Self-reflection in reflective practice: A note of caution. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 777–788
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright lies with the journal. Enquiries regarding reproduction should be sent in the first place to enquiries@whitingbirch.net
