Systematic and just: The use of a systematic review methodology in social work research

Authors

  • Emma Kelly University of Salford

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v15i3.833

Abstract

This discussion paper is based on my experiences with the Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) on a 12 day placement as part of the Research Development Initiative 4 (RDI4) program. Claims and counter claims are made about the appropriateness of a systematic review methodology in social work. These debates pivot around understandings of knowledge creation, function and ownership in social work and what constitutes evidence. This paper considers the contribution systematic review methodology can make to social work research. The SCIE systematic review is considered within the context of broader review types such as literature and narrative reviews. The review methodology developed by SCIE is promoted because of its explicit inclusion of service user and carer evidence. Systematic review methodology also offers social work researchers the opportunity to scrutinise their searching technique and process. A detailed examination of some obstacles in searching highlights the potential for error and bias. Frequently these are introduced unintentionally through a less than rigorous search of literature. It is hoped that an awareness of the pitfalls of literature searching will lead to greater transparency about claims made based on ‘available knowledge’. Social work has a specific contribution to make to the systematic review methodology as we pioneer ways of including service users and carer experience and knowledge. Systematic reviews are an appropriate methodology for social work and present an opportunity for the profession to raise the profile of alternative but reliable sources of evidence.

References

BASW (2011) The Code of Ethics for Social Work, statement of principles. Accessed on 14.06.12 at http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_112315-7.pdf

Boaz, A., Ashby, D. and Young, K. (2002) Systematic Reviews: What have they got to offer evidence based policy and practice? Working Paper2., London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice

Braye, S., and Preston-Shoot, M (2005) Emerging from out of the shadows? Service user and carer involvement in systematic reviews. Evidence & Policy, 1, 2, 173-194

Braye, S., and Preston-Shoot, M. (2007) On systematic reviews in social work: observations from teaching, learning and assessment of law in social work education. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 313–334

Butler, I. (2002) A code of ethics for social work and social care practice; A critical commentary. British Journal of Social Work 32, 2, 239-248

Campbell Collaboration (2011) What is a Systematic Review? Accessed on 14.06.12 at http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/what_is_a_systematic_review/index.php

Clapton, J. (2010) Bibliographic Databases for Social Care Searching. London: SCIE

Coren, E and Fisher, M. (2006) The Conduct of Systematic Research Reviews for SCIE. London: SCIE

Grayson, L., and Gomersall, A. (2003) A Difficult Business: finding the evidence for social science reviews, Working Paper 19. London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice

Grant, M., and Booth, A. (2009) A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal 26, 2, 91-108

Greenhalgh, T., and Peacock, R. (2005) Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. British Medical Journal 331, 1064-1065

Hart, C. (2001) Doing a Literature Search: A comprehensive guide for the social sciences. London: Sage

Higgins, J. and Green, S. (2011) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Accessed on 30.01.2012 at http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/

Hodge, D., Lacasse, J., and Benson, O. (2011) Influential publications in social work discourse: The 100 most highly cited articles in disciplinary journals: 2000–09. British Journal of Social Work, advance access. Accessed 31.01.12 at http://bjsw.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2011/07/07/bjsw.bcr093.short?rss=1

Holden, G., Barker, K., Covert-Vail, L., Rosenberg, G., and Cohen, S.A (2007) Does Social Work Abstracts work? Research on Social Work Practice 18, 5, 487-499

Holden, G., Barker, K., Covert-Vail, L., Rosenberg, G. and Cohen, S.A. (2009) Social Work Abstracts fails agains; A replication and extension. Research on Social Work Practice 19, 6, 715-721

Humphries, B. (2008) Social Work Research for Social Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

Littel, J (2010) Cochrane and Campbell Review Methods: What do we share? How do we differ?

Paper at The Colorado Colloquim in 2010. Accessed on 14.06.12 at http://www.cochrane.org/multimedia/multimedia-cochrane-colloquia-and-meetings/colloquium-colorado-2010/plenary-1-julia-littel

Mackay, G. (2007) Is there a need to differentiate between qualitative and quantitative searching strategies for literature reviewing? Qualitative Social Work 6, 2, 231-241

McDonald, G. (2003) Using systematic Reviews to Improve Social Care. London: SCIE

Marsh, P., and Fisher, M. (2005) Developing the Evidence Base for Social Work and Social Care Practice. London: SCIE

Mitchell, F., Lunt, N. and Shaw I. (2010) Practitioner research in social work: A knowledge review. In Evidence and Policy 6, 1, 7-31

Norton, M. (2008) Systematic reviews: can qualitative social work research live up to the zeitgeist? In Qualitative Social Work 7, 3, pp. 381-386

Orme, J., and Powell, J. (2007) Building research capacity in social work: process and issues. In British Journal of Social Work 38, 5, 988-1008

Pawson, R. (2002) Does Megan’s Law Work? A Theory-Driven Systematic Review. Working Paper 8. London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice

Pawson, R., Boaz, A., Grayson, L., Long, A. and Barnes, C. (2003) Knowledge Review Three:Types and Quality of Knowledge in Social Care. London, SCIE

Rutter, D., (2009) Practice Enquiry Guidelines: A framework for SCIE commissioners and providers. London: SCIE

Rutter, D., Francis, J., Coren, E and Fisher, M. (2011) SCIE systematic Research Reviews: Guidelines (2nd ed.) London: SCIE

Spencer, L Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., and Dillon, L. (2003) Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A framework for assessing research evidence. London: The Cabinet Office

Taylor, B., Demspter, M., and Donnelly, M. (2003) Hidden Gems; systematically searching electronic databases for research publications for social work and social care. In British Journal of Social Work 33, , 4, 423-439

Taylor, B., Wylie, E., Demspter, M., and Donnelly, M. (2007) Systematically retrieving research: A case study evaluating seven databases. Research on Social Work Practice 17, 6, 697-706

Taylor, B. (2009) Invited commentary on papers by Holden et al. and Shek on the quality of Social Work Abstracts. Research on Social Work Practice 19, 6, 366-369

Walter, I., Nutley, S., Percy-Smith, J., McNeish, D. and Frost, S. (2004) Improving the Use Of Research In Social Care Practice. SCIE Knowledge review 07. London: SCIE

Woods,K., Bond, C., Humphrey, W., Symes, N., and Green, L. (2011) Systematic Review of Solution Focuused Brief Therapy with Children and Families. London: DoE

Younger, P., and Boddy, K (2008) When is a search not a search? A comparison of searching the AMED complementary health database via EBSCOhost, OVID and DIALOG. In Health Information and Libraries Journal 26 , pp.126–135

Downloads

Published

2015-11-18

How to Cite

Kelly, E. (2015). Systematic and just: The use of a systematic review methodology in social work research. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 15(3), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v15i3.833