Safeguarding Adults Reviews: Prompting practice and policy

Authors

  • Jill Manthorpe King’s College London
  • Stephen Martineau King’s College London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v18i3.975

Abstract

Abstract: As a whole there was remarkably little controversy in England over the Care Act 2014, once debates over funding caps had been kicked into the long grass. After all, who could oppose the idea of better information, clearer entitlements, and more support for carers? Among the non-contentious areas were specific proposals for Serious Case Reviews (SCRs) to become Safeguarding Adults Reviews (SARs). In light of the many concerns in children’s services about the dominance of SCRs in policy and practice debates this lack of interest and discussion may seem surprising. In this paper we explore why such reviews concerning adults are largely seen as non-contentious and frame our analysis around four different ‘prompts’; those from Parliament, from earlier SCRs, from practice analysis and from practice development. We draw on our own wider research programme on Adult SCRs and subsequently SARs. This programme of research has explored different facets of the review process and undertaken different thematic analyses by location or user group.

Author Biographies

Jill Manthorpe, King’s College London

Professor, Social Care Workforce Research Unit,

Stephen Martineau, King’s College London

Research Associate, Social Care Workforce Research Unit,

References

Braye, S., Orr D. and Preston-Shoot, M (2011) SCIE Report 46: Self-neglect and adult safeguarding: Findings from research, London, SCIE, http://www.scie.org.uk/publications/reports/report46.asp (accessed 3 October 2016)

Braye, S., Orr D. and Preston-Shoot, M. (2015a) Learning lessons about self-neglect? An analysis of serious case reviews. The Journal of Adult Protection, 17(1) 3-18.

Braye, S., Orr, D. and Preston-Shoot, M. (2015b) Serious case review findings on the challenges of self-neglect: Indicators for good practice. The Journal of Adult Protection 17, 2, 75-87.

Department for Education (2016) Review of the role and functions of Local Safeguarding Children Boards: the government’s response to Alan Wood CBE). London, Department for Education, Reference: DFE-00130-2016, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/526330/Government_response_to_Alan_Wood_review.pdf (accessed 3 October 2016)

Department of Health (2014) Care and Support Statutory Guidance, London: Department of Health.

Department of Health (2016) Care and Support Statutory Guidance. London: Department of Health https://www.gov.uk/guidance/care-and-support-statutory-guidance (accessed 3 October 2016)

Flynn, M. (2007) The Murder of Steven Hoskin: A serious case review: executive summary, Truro: Cornwall Adult Protection Committee, Adult Social Care.

Flynn, M. (2012) Winterbourne View Hospital: A serious case review. Kingswood: South Gloucestershire Adult Safeguarding Board, http://hosted.southglos.gov.uk/wv/report.pdf (accessed 3 October 2016)

Flynn, M. (2013) Learning the Lessons from Complex Cases in Adult Safeguarding. Birmingham: BASW, https://www.basw.co.uk/resource/?id=2735 (accessed 3 October 2016)

Guerin, C. (2015) Proposal on Managing Resource Demands for Safeguarding Adults Reviews. London. London Safeguarding Adults Network. http://londonadass.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/LSAN-paper-on-Safeguarding-Adults-Reviews1.pdf (accessed 3 October 2016)

Klee, D. (2015) Safeguarding Adult Review in respect of Mr AA, Died January 2014. Norwich : Norfolk Safeguarding Adults Board and Suffolk Safeguarding Adults Board. http://www.suffolkas.org/assets/Safeguarding-Adult-Reviews/Safeguarding-Adult-Review-Mr-AA.pdf (accessed 3 October 2016)

Local Government Association (2015) The Place I Call Home. London: Local Government Association. http://www.local.gov.uk/place-i-call-home (accessed 3 October 2016)

Manthorpe, J. & Martineau, S. (2011) Serious case reviews in adult safeguarding in England: An analysis of a sample of reports, British Journal of Social Work, 41, 2, 224-241.

Manthorpe, J. & Martineau, S. (2012) ‘In our experience’: Chairing and commissioning Serious Case Reviews in adult safeguarding in England. Journal of Social Work, 12, 1, 84-89.

Manthorpe, J. and Martineau, S. (2016) Serious Case Reviews into Dementia Care: An Analysis of Context and Content, British Journal of Social Work, 46, 2, 514-53.

Rawlings, A., Paliokosta, P., Maisey, D., Johnson, J., Capstick, J. & Jones, R. (2014) A Study to Investigate the Barriers to Learning from Serious Case Reviews and Identify Ways of Overcoming these Barriers: Research report. London: Department for Education, Reference: DFE-RR 340, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/331658/RR340.pdf (accessed 3 October 2016)

Social Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) (2015) Safeguarding Adults Reviews under the Care Act: implementation support. London: SCIE, http://www.scie.org.uk/care-act-2014/safeguarding-adults/reviews/index.asp (accessed 3 October 2016)

Suffolk County Council (2016) Safeguarding Adults Reviews. Ipswich: Suffolk County Council, http://www.suffolkas.org/safeguarding-adults-reviews/ (accessed 3 October 2016)

The College of Social Work (2013) Good Practice Advice for Social Workers and Their Line Managers Working with People with Learning Disabilities Who Are Distressed or Whose Behaviour Challenges Those around Them. London: The College of Social Work, https://www.basw.co.uk/resources/tcsw/Winterbourne%20View%20Practice%20Guidance.pdf (accessed 3 October 2016)

Wood (2016) Wood Report: Review of the role and functions of Local Safeguarding Children Boards. London: Department for Education, Reference: DFE-001312016, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/526329/Alan_Wood_review.pdf (accessed 3 October 2016)

Published

2017-01-10

How to Cite

Manthorpe, J., & Martineau, S. (2017). Safeguarding Adults Reviews: Prompting practice and policy. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 18(3), 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v18i3.975

Issue

Section

Articles
Received 2017-01-10
Accepted 2017-01-10
Published 2017-01-10