Do groupthink symptoms reflect a single social influence process?

David Dryden Henningsen; Mary Lynn Miller Henningsen; Gregory Allen Russell

doi:10.1921/gpwk.v27i1.1095

Authors

David Dryden Henningsen Northern Illinois University
Mary Lynn Miller Henningsen Northern Illinois University
Gregory Allen Russell

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/gpwk.v27i1.1095

Abstract

Groupthink as a theory is established so that the symptoms of groupthink are considered parts of a single decision-making process. Evidence indicates that groupthink symptoms, however, do not act in a way consistent with the predictions of the theory. A test is conducted to explore the relationship among groupthink symptoms within members in decision-making groups. Findings indicate that different group members experience either internalization or compliance processes. Furthermore, minority and majority members were found to report different levels of compliance pressures during group discussion. Although the results raise questions about groupthink they are consistent with the linear discrepancy model of influence in groups.

Keywords: group decision-making; group dynamics; groupthink; social influence; groupwork; group work

Author Biographies

David Dryden Henningsen, Northern Illinois University

Professor

Mary Lynn Miller Henningsen, Northern Illinois University

Professor

Gregory Allen Russell

Senior Education Consultant

References

Aldag, R. J. & Fuller, S. R. (1993) Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 533-552

Boster, F. J., Fryrear, J. E., Mongeau, P. A. & Hunter, J. E. (1982) An unequal speaking linear discrepancy model: Implications for polarity shift. Communication Yearbook, 6,395-418

Boster, F. J., Hunter, J. E., & Hale, J. L. (1991) An information-processing model of jury decision making. Communication Research, 18, 524-547

Boster, F. J. & Mayer, M. (1984) Choice shifts: Argument qualities or social comparisons. Communication Yearbook, 8, 393-410

Boster, F. J., Mayer, M. E., Hunter, J. E. & Hale, J. L. (1980) Expanding the persuasive arguments explanation of the polarity shift: A linear discrepancy model. Communication Yearbook, 4,165-176

Chen, Z., Lawson, R. B., Gordon, L. R., & Mcintosh, B. (1996) Groupthink: Deciding with the leader and the devil. The Psychological Record, 46, 581-590

Choi, J. N. & Kim, M. U. (1999) The organizational application of Groupthink and its limitations in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 297-306

Cline, R. J. W. (1990) Detecting groupthink: Methods for observing the illusion of unanimity. Communication Quarterly, 38, 112-126

Courtright, J. A. (1978) A laboratory investigation of groupthink. Communication Monographs, 45, 229-246

Cruz, M. G., Henningsen, D. D. & Smith, B. A. (1999) The impact of directive leadership on group information sampling, decisions, and perceptions of the leader. Communication Research, 26, 349-369

Fournoff, M. E. & Henningsen, D. D. (2017) Testing the linear discrepancy model in perceptions of group decision-making. Western Journal of Communication, 81, 507-521

Fuller, S. R. & Aldag, R. J. (1998) Organizational Tonypandy: Lessons from a quarter century of the groupthink fiasco. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 73, 163-184

Greitmeyer, T. & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003) Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322-339

Henningsen, D.D. & Henningsen, M.L.M (2003) Examining social influence in information-sharing contexts. Small Group Research, 34, 391-412

Henningsen, D. D. & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2007) Examining the effect of marginal members in information sharing groups. Group Facilitation: Research and Applications Journal, 8, 22-29

Henningsen D. D. & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2015) The role of expertise and expressiveness in decision making groups. Communication Quarterly, 63, 463-479

Henningsen, D. D., Henningsen, M. L. M., Eden, J. & Cruz, M. G. (2006) Examining the symptoms of groupthink and retrospective sensemaking. Small Group Research, 37, 36-64

Henningsen, M. L. M. (2002, April) Groupthought: Analysis and Reconceptualization of groupthink. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Central States Communication Association, Milwaukee.

Henningsen, M. L. M., Henningsen, D. D., Cruz, M. G. & Morrill, J. (2003) Social influence in groups: A comparative application of Relational Framing Theory and the Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. Communication Monographs, 70, 175-196

Janis, I. L. (1972) Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin

Janis, I. L. (1982) Groupthink, (2nd ed.) Boston: Houghton-Mifflin

Janis, I. L. (1989) Crucial decisions: Leadership in policymaking and crisis management. New York: Free Press

Kelman, H. (1958) Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51–60

McCauley, C. (1989) The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 250-260

Park, W. (1990) A review of research on groupthink. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 229-245

Park, W. (2000) A comprehensive empirical investigation of the relationships among variables in the groupthink model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 873-887

Smith, R. A. & Boster, F. J. (2009) Understanding the influence of others perceptions of a message’s advocacy: Testing a two step model. Communication Monographs, 76, 333-350