How Pre-deliberation Processes Predict Group Discussion: An Application of the Goals-Plans-Action Model
The goal of the study was to investigate the role of pre-deliberation planning on the enactment of normative and informational influence attempts during group decision-making. The goals-plans-action model (Dillard, 1990) was used to frame the study. The participants (N=112) performed a judgmental group decision-making task. The results of the study support the GPA in several ways. Pre-deliberation plans were enacted in discussion. In support of the extant group literature, perceptions of the task type influenced the proportion of pre-deliberation informational plans. Post-discussion attitudes toward the group’s decision were related to goals and to the proportion of normative plans.
Berger, C. R. (1997). Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Berger, C. R., & diBattista, P. (1993). Communication failure and plan adaptation: If at first you don’t succeed, say it louder and slower. Communication Monographs, 60, 220-238. doi: 10.1080/03637759309376310
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon social judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636. doi: 10.1037/h0046408
Dillard, J. P. (1990). A goal-driven model of interpersonal influence. In J. P. Dillard (Ed.), Seeking compliance: The production of interpersonal influence messages (pp. 41-56). Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
Dillard, J. P. (2004). The goals-plans-action model of interpersonal influence. In J. S. Seiter & R. H. Gass (Eds.), Perspectives of persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining (pp. 185-206). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Dillard, J. P. (2015). Goals-plans-action theory of message production: Making influence messages. In D. O. Braithwaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging theories of interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 63-74). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Dillard, J. P., Anderson, J. W., & Knobloch, L. K. (2002). Interpersonal influence. In M. L. Knapp and J. A. Daly (Eds.) Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 425- 474). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J. M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56, 19-38. doi: 10.1080/03637758909390247
Henningsen, D.D., Cruz, M.G., & Miller, M.L. (2000). The role of social loafing in pre-deliberation decision making. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 4, 168-175.
Hullett, C. B. (2004). A test of the initial processes of the goal-planning-action model of interpersonal influence. Communication Studies, 55, 286-299.
Kaplan, M. F. (1989). Task, situational, and personal determinants of influence processes in group decision making. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.) Advances in group processes (Vol. 6, pp. 87-105). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Kaplan, M. F., & Miller, C. E. (1987). Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 306-313. doi: 10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1246
Kelly, J. R., Jackson, J. W., Hutson-Comeux, S. L. (1997). The effects of time pressure and task differences on influence modes and accuracy in decision-making groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 10-22. doi: 10.2277/0146167297231002
Kerr, N. L., & Watts, B. L. (1982). After division, before decision: Group faction size and pre-deliberation thinking. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 198-205.
Laughlin, P. R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative, problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 127-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Levine, J. M. & Russo, E. (1995). Impact of anticipated interaction on information acquisition. Social Cognition, 13, 293-317.
Meyer, J. R. (2005). Effect of secondary goal importance on the anticipation of message outcomes. Southern Communication Journal, 70, 109-122.
Meyer, J. R. (2009). Effect of primary goal and secondary goal importance and message plan acceptability. Communication Studies, 60, 509-525.doi: 10.1080/10510970903260343
Rugs, D., & Kaplan, M. F. (1993). Effectiveness of informational and normative influences in group decision making depends on the group interactive goal. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 147-158.
Simpson, R. H. (1939). The effect of discussion on intra-group divergencies of judgment. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 4, 546-552.
Wilson, S. R. (2002). Seeking and resisting compliance: Why people say what they do when trying to influence others. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wittenbaum, G. W., Stasser, G., & Merry, C. J. (1996). Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 129-152.