Theorizing practice research in social work

Lars Uggerhøj

doi:10.1921/swssr.v15i1.510

Authors

Lars Uggerhøj

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v15i1.510

Keywords:

practice research, practitioner research, user-controlled research, actual science, mode 2 knowledge production, barriers and possibilities in practice research, stakeholders in practice research

Abstract

The article focuses on theories, definitions, interests, possibilities and barriers in practice research in social work. It points out that both practice and research will be influenced by participating in and developing practice research. – and that both parts must and will learn from the process. To elaborate and define practice research in social work, it is necessary to consider connected approaches and theories. The article will show that practice research is both connected to and can use the theoretical frames of Actual science and Mode 2 knowledge production. To understand and develop research closely connected to practice it is necessary to define it in three different ways: practice research, practitioner research and user-controlled research. Examples from different Nordic approaches connected to these definitions will be presented. Although practice and research both need to develop practice research they do at the same time have different interests which will challenge both parts. Practice research must be looked upon as both an area of collaboration and a meeting point for different stakeholders: users, social workers, administrative management/organizers, politicians and researchers. It is stated that practice research at the same time need to break down barriers between the stakeholders, and to be aware not to combine them totally as differencies and dilemmas are a part of practice research and should remain so.

References

Bourdieu, P. (1972): Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press <a target="_blank" href='http://hsr.e-contentmanagement.com/11.1/11-1p79.htm'>http://hsr.e-contentmanagement.com/11.1/11-1p79.htm</a>\nBourdieu, P. (1982): The Logic of Practice, Cambridge: Polity Press <a target="_blank" href='http://www.socsci.soton.ac.uk/spring/salisbury'>http://www.socsci.soton.ac.uk/spring/salisbury/</a>\nFlyvbjerg, B. (1991): Rationalitet og magt, København: Akademisk Forlag\nFlyvbjerg, B. (1998): Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press\nFlyvbjerg, B. (2001): Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again, New York: Cambridge University Press\nGibbons, J. (2001): Effective practice: social work‘s long history of concerns about outcomes, Australian Social Work, 54 (3), September 2001, pp. 3–13.\nGibbons, M. et al. (1994): The New Production of Knowledge, London: Sage Publications Ltd\nGredig, D. & Sommerfeld, P. (2008): New Proposals for Generating and Exploiting Solution-oriented Knowledge, Research on Social Work Practice 18; 292.\nEbsen, F. & Uggerhøj, L. (2007): Praksisforskning i socialt arbejde, Unpublished application.\nEpstein, I. (2001): Using Available Clinical Information in Practice-based Research: Mining for Silver While Dreaming of Gold. In Epstein, I. & Blumenfield, S. (eds.) (2001): ‘Clinical Data-mining in Practice-based Research – Social Work in Hospital Settings’, New York: The Haworth Social Work Practice Press.\nEpstein, I. & Blumenfield, S. (eds.) (2001): Clinical Data-mining in Practice-based Research—Social Work in Hospital Settings, New York: The Haworth Social Work Practice Press.\nHarmaakorpi, V. & Mutanen, A. (2008): Knowledge Production in Networked Practice-based Inno-vation Processes – Interrogative Model as a Methodological Approach, Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, vol 3, 2008.\nHeinrich C. J. (2002): Outcomes-based Performance Management in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness, Public Administration Review, Vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 712–725, Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management, 3, 14.\nHelse- og Omsorgsdepartementet (2005): Forsøk med nye samarbeidsformer mellom forskning, ut-danning og praksis i sosialtjenesten: St.prp.nr.1 (2005-06), Oslo: Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet.\nHunter, E. & Tsey, K. (2002): Indigenous health and the contribution of sociology: a review, Health Sociology Review 11, 1–2, (http://hsr.e-contentmanagement.com/11.1/11-1p79.htm)\nKjærsdam, W. (2009): Veje til kvalificering af socialt arbejde, Upubliceret undervisningsmateriale.\nKristiansson, Michael René (2006): Modus 2 vidensproduktion, DF Revy nr. 2, februar 2006.\nLjunggren, Synnöve (2005): Empiri, evidens, empati—Nordiska röster om kunskapsutveckling i so-cialt arbete, Århus: Nordiska ministerrådet och Nopus, Nord: 2005:5\nLähteinen, M. (2005): Kunskapsutveckling och kompetensuppbyggande in Ljunggren, Synnöve (2005) ’Empiri, evidens, empati – Nordiska röster om kunskapsutveckling i socialt arbete’, Århus.\nNordiska ministerrådet och Nopus, Nord: 2005:5.\nNowotny, H, Scott, P. & Gibbons, M. (2001): Re-thinking Science – Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.\nOsborne, S. (2002): Public Management – A Critical Perspective, London: Routledge.\nPain, H. (2008): Practice Research Literature Review, unpublished draft, University of Southampton.\nRamian, K. (2009): Evidens på egne præmisser, Vidensbaseret arbejde 2009, 1. februar 2009 2. årgang.\nRamian, K. (2003): Praksisforskning som læringsrum, Uden for Nummer 7/2003.\nRasmussen, J., Kruse, S. & Holm, C. (2007): Viden om dannelse – Uddannelsesforskning, pædagogik og pædagogisk praksis, København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.\nReed, J. & Biott, C. (1995): Evaluating and Developing Practitioner Research. Practice Research in Health Care: This Inside Story, London: Chapman Hall.\nRehr, H. (2001): Foreword in Epstein, I & Blumenfield, S (eds.) (2001) ‘Clinical Data-mining in Practice-based Research – Social Work in Hospital Settings’, New York: The Haworth Social Work Practice Press.\nSalisbury Statement (2009): The Salisbury Statement on practice research, http://www.socsci.soton.ac.uk/spring/salisbury/, University of Southampton.\nSocialstyrelsen (2005): Nationellt stöd för kunskapsutveckling inom socialtjänsten, Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.\nThe Free Dictionary by Farlex <a target="_blank" href='http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dialectic'>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dialectic</a>\nUggerhøj, L. (2000): Den indviklede udvikling, København: Center for Forskning i Socialt Arbejde.\nUggerhøj, L. (1995): Hjælp eller afhængighed, Aalborg Universitetsforlag, Aalborg.\nWinter, S. (1983): Effektivitet og produktivitet i den offentlige sektor 1, Politica, Bind 15, 3. <a target="_blank" href='http://www.socsci.aau.dk/foso/eng-index.htm'>http://www.socsci.aau.dk/foso/eng-index.htm</a>\n