‘They thought I wasn’t good enough for social work practice’

Authors

  • Alberto Poletti
  • Ann Anka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v11i3.272

Keywords:

placement failure, marginal students, placement breakdown, failing students, student perspectives

Abstract

The few studies of why social work students fail their practice learning opportunity (PLOs) have been undertaken through the lens of practice educators, lecturers and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) with no input from students. Using qualitative interviews; this research explores the reasons for failure from the perspective of the students. The findings identified a number of interrelated issues such as previous work experiences, family history and personal circumstances as the rationale for what led those interviewed into social work. Issues such as ill health, personal problems and lack of clarity around assessment criteria as well as perceived lack of support from HEIs were identified as some of the factors that led students to fail their practice learning experiences. Recommendations from those interviewed included the suggestion that HEIs should, at the recruitment stage, provide clear information about the implications of failing practice learning opportunities and clarify what type of support for is available for those who fail. The students interviewed also echo the desire expressed by the HEIs and practice educators for clearer assessment criteria/frameworks and a more supportive process for all parties.

References

Barlow, C., Hall B. (2007) ‘What About Feelings?’ A Study of Emotions and Tension in Social Work Field Education. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 26. 4. 399-413\nBourdieu, P. (1984) [1979] <i>Distinction</i>. Trans. Richard Nice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press\nBourdieu, P. (1990) <i>The Logic of Practice</i>. Cambridge: Polity Press\nBourdieu, P. (1990a) <i>In Other Words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology</i>. Cambridge: Polity Press\nBourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992) <i>An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology</i>. Chicago: University of Chicago Press\nDarra, S. (2008) Emotion work and the ethics of novice insider research. <i>Journal of Research in Nursing</i> 13., 3, 251–261\nDepartment Of Health (DoH) (2002) <i>Requirement for the Social Work Training</i>. London: DOH\nDepartment Of Health (DoH) (2005) <i>The Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care and the Code of Practice for Social Workers</i>. London: DOH\nDickson-Swift, V., James, El., and Liamputtong, P. (2008) <i>Understanding Sensitive Research in the Health and Social Sciences: Managing boundaries, emotions and risks</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press\nDowling, M. (2004) Hermeneutics: An exploration. <i>Nurse Researcher</i> 11, 4, 20-29\nDrake, P. (2010) Grasping at mythological understanding: a cautionary tale from insider research. <i>International Journal of Research Method in Education</i> 33, 1, 85-99\nEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC) (2010) <i>Framework Research Ethics</i>. Swindon: ESRC. [http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Framework_for_Research_Ethics_tcm8-4586.pdf] <a target="_blank" href='http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Framework_for_Research_Ethics_tcm8-4586.pdf'>http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/Framework_for_Research_Ethics_tcm8-4586.pdf</a>\nEvaluation of Social Work Degree Qualification Team (2008) <i>Evaluation of the New Social Work Degree Qualification in England. Executive Summary</i>. London: King’s College London, Social Care Workforce Research Unit\nFinch, J. (2010) ‘<i>Can’t fail, Won’t Fail’. Why Practice Assessors Find it Difficult to Fail Social Work Students. A Qualitative study of practice assessors experiences of assessing marginal or failing social work students</i>. DSW Thesis, University of Sussex\nFurness, S. (2012) Gender at work: Characteristics of ‘failing’ social work students. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 42, 3, 480-499\nFurness, S., and Gilligan, P. (2004) Fit for purpose: Issues from practice placements, practice teaching and the assessment of students’ practice, <i>Social Work Education</i>, 23, 4, 465-479\nGadamer, H.G. (2004) <i>Truth and Method</i>. London: Continuum\nGeneral Social Care Council (GSCC) (2002) <i>Code of Practice</i>, London: GSCC\nGeneral Social Care Council (GSCC) (2005) <i>Post-qualifying framework for social work education and training</i>, London: GSCC\nGSCC (2010) Raising Standards: Social Work Education in England 2008–09, London, GSCC, [http://www.gscc.org.uk/cmsFiles/Education%20and%20Training/SWEG%20Publications/Raising_Standards_08-09_web.pdf] <a target="_blank" href='http://www.gscc.org.uk/cmsFiles/Education%20and%20Training/SWEG%20Publications/Raising_Standards_08-09_web.pdf'>http://www.gscc.org.uk/cmsFiles/Education%20and%20Training/SWEG%20Publications/Raising_Standards_08-09_web.pdf</a>\nFlood, A. (2010) Understanding phenomenology. <i>Nurseresearcher</i>, 17, 2, 7-15\nHouston, s. (2002) Reflecting on habitus, field and capital: Towards a culturally sensitive social work. <i>Journal of Social Work</i>, 2, 2, 149-167\nKinman, G. and Grant, L. (2011) Exploring stress resilience in trainee social workers: The roles of emotional and social competencies. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 41, 261-275\nMaton, K. (2008) Habitus. in M., Grenfell (Ed.) <i>Pierre Bourdieu: Key concepts</i>. Durham: Acumen\nMcConnell-Henry, T., Chapman, Y., and Francis, K. (2011) Member checking and Heideggerian phenomenology: A redundant component. <i>Nurse Researcher</i> 18, 2, 28-37\nMclaughlin, C. (2003) The feeling of finding out: The role of emotions in research. <i>Educational Action Research</i> 11, 1, 65-77\nMercer, J. (2007) The Challenges of insider research in educational institutions: Wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas, <i>Oxford Review of Education</i>, 33, 1, 1-17\nMoustakas, C. (1994) <i>Phenomenological Research Methods</i>. London: Sage Publication\nNash, R. (1999). Bourdieu, ‘Habitus’, and Educational Research: Is it all worth the candle?, <i>British Journal of Sociology of Education</i>, 20, 2, 175-187\nPatton, M., Q. (2002) <i>Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods</i>. (3rd ed.) London: Sage\nParker, J. (2007) Developing Effective Practice Learning for Tomorrow’s Social Workers, <i>Social Work Education</i>, 26 (8): 763-779\nParker, J. (2010) When things go wrong! Placement disruption and termination: power and student perspectives. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i> 40, 3, 983-999\nThe British Association Of Social Workers (BASW) (2012) <i>The Code of Ethics for Social Work</i>. Birmingham: BASW\nThomson, P. (2008) Field. in M., Grenfell (ed.) <i>Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts’:</i> Durham: Acumen\nTOPSS (Training Organization for the Personal Social Services) England (2002) <i>The National Occupational Standards for Social Work</i>. Leeds: TOPPS\nRicoeur, P. (1971) The model of the text: Meaningful action considered as Text. <i>Social Research</i>. 38, 3, 529-562\nRobson, C. (1993) <i>Real World Research: A resource for social scientists and practitioners</i>. Oxford: Blackwell\nRobson, C. (2002) <i>Real World Research: A resource for social scientists and practitioners</i>. (2nd ed.) Oxford: Blackwell\nRose, P., Beeby, J., and Parker, D. (1995) Academic rigour in the lived experience of researchers using phenomenological methods in nursing. <i>Journal of Advanced Nursing</i>, 21,: 1123-1129\nRoulston, K. (2010) <i>Reflective interviewing: a guide to theory and practice</i>. London: Sage Publications\nSharland, E., and Taylor, I. (2006) Social care research: A suitable case for systematic review? <i>Evidence and Policy</i>, 2, 4, 503-523\nSocial Work Reform Board (SWRB) (2011a) Progress of the social work reform programme. Skills for Care Conference Ambition to Reality. London: Skills for Care\n

Downloads

Published

2013-05-28

How to Cite

Poletti, A., & Anka, A. (2013). ‘They thought I wasn’t good enough for social work practice’. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v11i3.272

Issue

Section

Articles