Addressing professional suitability in social work education


  • Jeanette S. Robertson



Gatekeeping, social work education, professional suitability, field education coordinator, field instructors, Faculty liaisons


Limited research exists pertaining to field education coordinators’ leadership and educational practice in general, or with respect to the specific topic of gatekeeping in social work education. This article presents the results of a Canadian study that investigates the experience and approach of field education coordinators in addressing student professional suitability concerns. This exploratory study consists of a focus group conducted with field education coordinators from across Canada, and an extensive web-based survey questionnaire administered to all current, and some former social work field education coordinators in Canada. In brief, the results of this study reinforce the perception found in social work literature that gatekeeping predominantly falls to the field component of social work education. Findings of the study provide insight into the location of field education within academia; and highlights the important leadership role undertaken by field education coordinators in supporting students, faculty liaisons, field educators, and university administration in addressing concerns related to student professional suitability. Implications for social work education are discussed.


Armstrong, J. (2006) Falsely accused of abuse, woman wins case. <i>The Globe and Mail</i>, 28 January, p. A5\nBarlow, C. and Coleman, H. (2003) Suitability for practice guidelines for students: A survey of Canadian social work programmes. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 22, 2, 151-164\nBorn, C., and Carol, D. (1988) Ethics in admissions. <i>Journal of Social Work Education</i>, 1, 79-85\nCanadian Association for Social Education: Board of Accreditation Manual. (2007) <i>Educational Policy Statements</i>. Ottawa: Canadian Association for Social Education\nCole, B., and Lewis, R. (1993) Gatekeeping through termination of unsuitable social work students: Legal issues and guidelines. <i>Journal of Social Work Education, 29</i>, 2, 150-159\nCreswell, J. (2009) <i>Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (</i>3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage\nCrisp, B., and Green Lister, P. (2002) Assessment methods in social work education: A review of the literature. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 21, 2, 259-269\nDillman, D., Smyth, J. and Christian, L. (2009) <i>Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method</i> (2nd ed). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley\nDominelli, L. (1988) <i>Anti-Racist Social Work</i>. London: Macmillan\nDominelli, L., and McLeod, E. (1989) <i>Feminist Social Work</i>. London: Macmillan\nFook, J. (2002) <i>Social Work: Critical theory and practice</i>. London: Sage\nFurness, S. and Gilligan, P. (2004) Fit for purpose: Issues from practice placements, practice teaching and the assessment of students’ practice. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 23, 4, 465-479\nGibbs, P. and Macy, J. (2000) Introduction: The arena of gatekeeping. in P. Gibbs and E. Blakely (Eds.), <i>Gatekeeping in BSW programs</i>. New York: Columbia University Press (pp. 3-21)\nGigerenzer, G. (2007) <i>Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious</i>. New York: Penguin\nHartman, C., and Wills, R.M. (1991) The gatekeeper role in social work: A survey. in D. Schneck, B. Grossman, and U. Glassman (Eds.) <i>Field Education in Social Work Contemporary issues and trends</i>. Iowa: Kendall/Hunt <i>(</i>pp.310-319)\nHawthorne, L. and Holtzman, R.F. (1991) Directors of field education: Critical role dilemmas. in D. Schneck, B. Grossman, and U. Glassman (Eds.), <i>Field Education in Social Work: Contemporary issues and trends (</i>pp.320-328). Iowa: Kendall/Hunt <i>(</i>pp.310-319)\nHolland, T. and Kilpatrick, A. (1991) Ethical issues in social work: Toward a grounded theory of professional ethics. <i>Social Work</i>, 36, 2, 138-144\nJenkins, D., Moore, L. and Dietz, T. (1996) Gatekeeping in the BSW programs: Details of an interview process. <i>Arete</i>, 21, 1, 13-23\nJenkins., L. and Sheafor, B. (1982) An overview of social work field instruction. in. B. Sheafor and L. Jenkins (Eds.), <i>Quality Field Instruction in Social Work</i>. New York: Longman (pp. 116-135)\nJones, E. (1984) Square peg, round hole: The dilemma of the undergraduate social work field coordinator. <i>Journal of Education for Social Work</i>, 20, 3, 45-50\nKropf, N. (2000) Gatekeeping in BSW programs: A review of the research, in P. Gibbs and E. Blakely (Eds.), <i>Gatekeeping in BSW programs</i> (pp.60-72). New York: Columbia University Press\nLafrance, J., Gray, E. and Herbert, M. (2004) Gate-keeping for professional social work practice. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 23, 3, 325-340\nLigon, J. and Ward, J. (2005) A national study of the field liaison role in social work education programs in the United States and Puerto Rico. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 24, 2, 235-243.\nLeonard, P. (2001) The Future of Critical Social Work in Uncertain Conditions, <i>Critical Social Work</i>, 2, 1 ( <a target="_blank" href=''></a>\nMiller, J. and Koerin, B. (2001) Gatekeeping in the practicum: What field instructors need to know. <i>The Clinical Supervisor</i>, 20, 2, 1-18.\nMoore, L., Dietz, T. and Jenkins, D. (1998) Issues in gatekeeping. <i>Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work</i>, 4, 1, 37-50\nMoore, L., and Urwin, C. (1990) Quality control in social work: The gatekeeping role in social work education. <i>Journal of Teaching in Social Work</i>, 4, 1, 113-128\nMoore, L. and Urwin, C. (1991) Gatekeeping: A model for screening baccalaureate students for field education. <i>Journal of Social Work Education</i>, 27, 1, 8-17\nMoreau, M. (1993) <i>Empowerment II: Snapshots of the Structural Approach in Action</i>. Ottawa: Carleton University Press\nRaymond, G. (2000) Gatekeeping in field education. in P. Gibbs and E. Blakely (Eds.) <i>Gatekeeping in BSW programs</i>. New York: Columbia University Press (pp. 107-134)\nRedmond, M., and Bright, E. (2007) Gatekeeping in the academy. <i>Canadian Social Work Review</i>, 24, 2, 167-181.\nRoche, S.E., Dewees, M., Trailweaver, R., Alexander, S., Cuddy, C. and Handy, M. (1999) <i>Contesting Boundaries in Social Work Education: A liberatory approach</i>. Alexandria, VA. Council on Social Work Education\nRoyse, D. (2000) The ethics of gatekeeping. in P. Gibbs and E. Blakely (Eds.), <i>Gatekeeping in BSW programs</i>. New York: Columbia University Press (pp. 22-44)\nRyan, M., McCormack, J., and Cleak, H. (2006) Student performance in field education placements: The findings of a 6-year Australian study of admissions data. <i>Journal of Social Work Education</i>, 42, 1, 67-84.\nTam, M. (2004) Gatekeeping in baccalaureate of social work (BSW) field education. <i>The Humanities and Social Sciences</i>, 65, 12, Dissertation\nWilliamson, K. (2002) (Ed.) <i>Research Methods for Students, Academics and Professionals: Information management and systems</i> (2nd ed.). New South Wales: Centre for Information Studies\n




How to Cite

Robertson, J. S. (2013). Addressing professional suitability in social work education. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 98-117.