Surveillance and silence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v11i3.279Keywords:
surveillance, anxiety, practice educators, failing students, discursive spaces, FoucaultAbstract
Studies to date have highlighted a number of key factors in the assessment of difficult social work placements including the need for adequate professional formation; communication; the changing social work education framework; and the influence of the wider social work context. Factors less widely examined are the perceptions of some practice educators that the assessment of placement students operates in a wider context of surveillance and scrutiny by a range of stakeholders. We argue that such perceptions of surveillance can cause a discursive anxiety for practice educators and can inhibit key developmental conversations between assessor and student. Drawing on interviews with ten practice educators, we examine the tendency of practice educators reflecting on a failed placement to rehearse or even enact those key developmental conversations post hoc, broaching previously unstated or tacit aspects of the placement experience. We argue for the need to create a safe discursive space for these conversations to take place in situ during the challenging placement and suggest that a diminution in perceptions of surveillance and enhanced outcomes for students and practice educators will result.
References
Alperin, D. (1996) Empirical research on student assessment in field education: What have we learned, <i>The Clinical Supervisor</i>, 14, 1, 149-161\nBasnett, F. and Sheffield, D. (2010) The Impact of Social Work Student Failures upon Practice Educators. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 40, 7, 2119-2136\nBeverley, A. and Worsley, A. (2008) <i>Learning and Teaching in Social Work Practice</i>. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan\nBurgess, R., Campbell, V., Phillips, R. and Skinner, K. (1998) Managing Unsuccessful or Uncompleted Placements. <i>Journal of Practice Teaching</i>, 7, 4-12\nCrisp, B. R. and Green Lister, P. (2002) Assessment Methods in Social Work Education: A Review of the Literature. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 21, 2, 260-269\nCuddon, J. A. (1999) <i>Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory</i>. London: Penguin\nDingwall, R., Eekelaar, J. and Murray, T. (1983) <i>The Protection of Children: State Intervention and Family Life</i>, Oxford, Blackwell\nDuffy, K. (2004) <i>Failing Students</i>. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council\nEraut, M. (1994) <i>Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence</i>, Abingdon: Routledge\nFoucault, M (1977) <i>Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison</i>. New York: Random House\nFurness, S. and Gilligan, P. (2004) Fit for Purpose: Issues from practice placements, practice teaching and the assessment of students’ practice. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 23, 4, 465-479\nGambrill, E. (2002) Evaluating The Outcomes Of Social Work Practice: A pilot program. <i>Journal of Social Work Education</i>, 38, 3, 355–62\nGibson, M. (2012) Narrative Practice and Social Work Education: Using a narrative approach in social work practice education to develop struggling social work students. <i>Practice</i>, 1-13\nGSCC (2007<i>) Social Work Education in England: Delivering Quality, Recognising Success: The 2007 Social Work Education Quality Assurance Report</i>. London: GSCC\nGSCC (2010) <i>Raising Standards: Social work conduct in England 2003-08</i>. London: GSCC\nHolmström, C. and Taylor, I. (2008) Mapping the Terrain of Selection for Social Work: A critical analysis of policy, theory and research. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 27, 5, 519-535\nIlott, I. and Murphy, R. (1997) Feelings and Failing in Professional Training: the assessor’s dilemma<i>. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education</i>, 22, 307-316\nIlott, I. and Murphy, R. (1999) <i>Success and Failure in Professional Education: Assessing the Evidence</i>, London: Whurr\nKim, J. (2011) <i>Arrival of the Inverse Panopticon Society: From Wikileaks to the Facebook revolution</i>, Tokyo: Discover 21\nLaFrance, J., Gray, E. and Herbert, M. (2004) Gate-keeping for professional social work practice. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 23, 3, 325-340\nLefevre, M. (2005) Facilitating Practice Learning and Assessment: The influence of relationship. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 24, 5, 565-583\nLuckock, B., Lefevre, M. and Tanner, K. (2007) Teaching and learning communication with children and young people: developing the qualifying social work curriculum in a changing policy context. <i>Child and Family Social Work</i>, 12, 2, 192-201\nMann, S. (1998) ‘Reflectionism’ and ‘diffusionism’: New tactics for deconstructing the video surveillance superhighway. <i>Leonardo</i>, 31, 2, 93-102\nMann, S., Nolan, J., and Wellman, B. (2003) Sousveillance: inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments, <i>Surveillance and Society</i>, 1, 3, 331-355\nMoore, D. (2011) The Benevolent Watch: Therapeutic surveillance in drug treatment court <i>Theoretical Criminology</i>, 1, 3, 255–268\nMarsick, V. J. (1999) The Many Faces of Action Learning, <i>Management Learning</i>, 30, 2, 159-176\nNewman, M. (2009) Social work degrees difficult to fail, MPs told. <i>Times Higher Education Supplement</i>. Available from: < <a target="_blank" href='http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=407667andsectioncode=26'>http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storyCode=407667andsectioncode=26</a>\nParker, J. (2010) When things go wrong! Placement disruption and termination: Power and student perspectives. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 40, 3, 983-999\nProctor, A. K. (1993) Tutors Professional Knowledge of Supervision and the Implications for Supervision Practice. in J. Calderhead and P. Gates (Eds.) <i>Conceptualizing Reflection in Teacher Development</i>. London: Falmer\nRabinow, P. (1984) <i>The Foucault Reader</i>. New York: Pantheon Books\nRai, G.S. (2004) International fieldwork experience: A survey of US schools, <i>International Social Work</i>, 47, 2, 213-226\nRaymond, G. T. (2000) Gatekeeping in field education. in P. Gibbs and E.H. Blakely (Eds.) <i>Gatekeeping in BSW Programs</i>. New York<i>:</i> Colombia University Press\nRedfern, S., Norman, I., Calman, L., Watson, R. and Murrells, T. (2002) Assessing competence to practise in nursing: A review of the literature<i>. Research Papers in Education</i>, 17, 1, 51-77\nRichards, S., Ruch, G. and Trevithick, P. (2005) Communication Skills Training for Practice: The ethical dilemma for social work education. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 24, 4, 409-422\nRoyse, P. (2000) <i>The Ethics of Gatekeeping</i>. in P. Gibbs and E.H. Blakely (Eds.) <i>Gatekeeping in BSW Programs</i>. New York<i>:</i> Colombia University Press\nRuch, G. (2007) Reflective practice in contemporary child-care social Work: The role of containment. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 37, 4, 659-680\nRyan, G.W. and Bernard, H.R. (2003) Techniques to Identify Themes. <i>Field Methods</i>, 15, 85-109\nRyan, M., Habibis, D. and Craft, C. (1997) Guarding the Gates of the Profession: Findings of a survey of gatekeeping mechanisms in Australian Bachelor of Social Work programs. <i>Australian Social Work</i>, 50, 3, 5-12\nShapton, M. (2006) Failing to Fail: Is the assessment process failing the caring profession<i>? Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning</i>, 7, 2, 39-54\nSharp, M. and Danbury, H. (1999) <i>The Management of Failing DipSW Students: Activities and exercises to prepare practice teachers for work with failing students</i>. Aldershot: Ashgate\nSchaub, J. and Dalrymple, R. (2011) ‘She didn’t seem like a social worker’: Practice educators’ experiences and perceptions of assessing failing social work students on placement. <a target="_blank" href='http://www.swapbox.ac.uk/1151/'>http://www.swapbox.ac.uk/1151/</a>\nSocial Work Reform Board (2010a) <i>Building a Safe and Confident Future: One year on Progress report from the Social Work Reform Board</i>. London: Department for Education\nSocial Work Reform Board (2010b) <i>Practice Educator Professional Standards for Social Work</i>. London: Department for Education\nTrevithick, P. (2005) <i>Social Work Skills: A practice handbook</i>. (2nd ed.) Maidenhead: Open University Press\nVitali, S. (2011) The acquisition of social work competencies. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 30. 2, 236-246\nWaterhouse, T., McLagan, S. and Murr, A. (2011) From practitioner to practice educator: What supports and what hinders the development of confidence in teaching and assessing student social workers? <i>Practice</i>, 23, 95-110.\nYounes, M.N. (1998) The gatekeeping dilemma in undergraduate programs: Collision of ideal and reality. <i>International Social Work</i>, 41, 145-153.\n
Downloads
Published
2013-05-28
How to Cite
Schaub, J., & Dalrymple, R. (2013). Surveillance and silence. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v11i3.279
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright lies with the journal. Enquiries regarding reproduction should be sent in the first place to enquiries@whitingbirch.net.
