How academic knowledge can support practice learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v5i2.306Keywords:
learning styles, student learning, teachingAbstract
This paper focuses on the Department of Health (2002) statement that academic knowledge should be used to support practice learning. Debates around linking theory and practice and knowledge as product and process are discussed. The particular emphasis is on critically analysing whether academic knowledge about learning styles - a form of ‘process knowledge’ – can be effectively utilised and therefore relevant to supporting the process of practice teaching. A small-scale qualitative research study with practice teachers and students is presented as a way of exploring this.
The findings of this research suggest that information about learning styles can be of practical relevance to practice teachers in promoting effective student learning. The key finding here is that its relevance is determined primarily by how such knowledge is utilised in practice. It is crucial whether practice teachers perceive information about their student’s learning styles as product knowledge (something they possess but do not necessarily employ) or process knowledge (something which usefully describes part of the process they are engaged in).
References
Bergengarten, S. (1957) Identifying learning patterns of individual students’: An exploratory study. <i>Social Services Review</i>, 31, 407-17\nCarew, (1979) The place of knowledge in social work activity. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 9, 349-64\nCartney, P. (2000) Adult learning styles: implications for practice teaching in social work, <i>Social Work Education</i>, 19, 6, 609-626\nCurnock, K. and Hardiker, P. (1979) <i>Towards Practice Theory</i>. London: Routledge, & Kegan Paul\nCurry, L. (1990) A critique of the research on learning styles. <i>Educational Leadership</i>, 48, 2, 50-56\nDepartment of Health (2000) <i>Requirements for Social Work Training</i>, London: DoH\nDoel, M. and Shardlow, S. (1996) <i>Social Work in a Changing World: An international perspective on practice learning</i>. Aldershot: Arena\nFox, R. and Guild, P. (1987) Learning styles: Their relevance to clinical supervision. <i>The Clinical Supervisor</i>, 5, 3, 65-77\nFry, H., Ketteridge, S. and Marshall, S. (1999) <i>A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education</i>. London: Kogan Page\nGeneral Social Care Council (2002) <i>The Review of Post-Qualifying Education and Training</i>. London: GSCC\nHoney, P. and Mumford, A. (1986) <i>The Manual of Learning Styles</i>. Maidenhead: Ardingly House\nKadushin, A. (1992) <i>Supervision in Social Work</i>. (3rd ed) New York: Columbia University Press\nKeefe, J.W. and Ferrell, B.G. (1990) Developing a defensible learning style paradigm. <i>Educational Leadership</i>, October, pp.57-61\nKnowles M. and Associates (1984) <i>Andragogy in Action</i>. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company\nKruzich, J.M., Friesen, B.J. and Van Soest, D. (1986) Assessment of student and faculty learning styles: research and application, <i>Journal of Social Work Education</i>, 3, 22-30\nPapell, C. (1978) A study of styles of learning for direct social work practice. <i>Dissertation Abstracts International</i>, 39, 1842A-1843A\nParton, N. (2000) Some thoughts on the relationship between theory and practice in and for social work, <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 30, 449-463\nPask, G. (1976) Styles and strategies of learning. <i>British Journal of Educational Psychology</i>, 46, 128-148\nPrice, G.E., Dunn, R. and Dunn, K. (1982) <i>PEPS</i>. (Productivity Environmental Preference Survey Manual) (revised ed.) Lawrence, KS: Price Systems\nRamsden, P. (1985) Student learning research: retrospect and prospect. <i>Higher Education Research and Development</i>, 4, 1, 51-69\nSecker, J. (1993) <i>From Theory to Practice in Social Work</i>, Aldershot: Avebury\nShardlow, S. and Doel, M. (1996) <i>Practice Learning and Teaching</i>. Basingstoke: Macmillan\nSheppard, M., Newstead, S., Di Caccavo, A. and Ryan, K. (2000) Reflexivity and the development of process knowledge in social work: A classification and empirical study. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 30, 465-488\nShipman, S. and Shipman, V.C. (1985) Cognitive styles: Some conceptual, methodological and applied issues. in E.W. Gordon (Ed.) <i>Review of Research in Education</i>. Washington DC: American Educational Research Association\nSims, S.J. and Sims, R.R. (Eds) (1995) <i>The Importance of Learning Styles: Understanding the implications for learning, course design and evaluation</i>. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press\nSims, R.R., Veres, J.G. and Locklear, T. (1991) An investigation of a modified version of Kolb’s revised learning styles inventory. <i>Educational and Psychological Measurement</i>, 5, 1, 143-150\nSims, R.R., Veres, J.G. and Shake, L.G.(1989) An exploratory examination of the convergence between the learning styles questionnaire and the learning styles inventory II. <i>Educational and Psychological Measurement</i>, 49, 1, 227-233\nStevenson, O. and Parsloe, P. (1978) <i>Social Services Teams: The practitioners’ view</i>. London: HMSO\nTsang, N.M. (1993) Shifts of students’ learning styles on a social work course, <i>Social Work Education</i>, 12, 1, 62-67\nWilson, G. (2000) Developing practice learning: the practice teacher’s perspective. <i>The Journal of Practice Teaching in Health and Social Work</i>, 3, 2, 44-62\nWolf, D. M. and Kolb, D.A. (1984) Career development, personal growth and experiential learning. in D. Kolb, I. Rubin, and J. McIntyre, (Eds.) <i>Organisational Psychology: Readings on human behaviour</i>. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall\n
Downloads
Published
2012-12-26
How to Cite
Cartney, P. (2012). How academic knowledge can support practice learning. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v5i2.306
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright lies with the journal. Enquiries regarding reproduction should be sent in the first place to enquiries@whitingbirch.net.
