Planning for learning and learning about planning in social work fieldwork

Authors

  • David Hodgson
  • Heather Walford

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v7i1.343

Keywords:

Social work, Fieldwork, planning, learning

Abstract

Fieldwork education is a crucial component of social work education. Many social work students regard their placement experiences as the most profound learning experiences of their studies. The students undertake their field placements in a diverse range of organisational contexts, and in so doing perform a myriad of tasks, adopt a variety of roles, implement a range of practices, and engage with numerous people. Needless to say, social work students have a rich set of learning opportunities within such diversity. An important part of the fieldwork process is the development of learning plans; these plans guide and direct the students’ roles, tasks and learning, and are often an important framework by which assessment of competency and learning takes place. However, learning plans presuppose a logical and conceptual clarity, which needs to be learned if they are to be functional and effective documents. This then poses many challenges in relation to how students might develop a learning plan for fieldwork. This paper explores some of the problems, and offers practical guidance, for students and fieldwork educators to develop rational learning plans in diverse and complex contexts.

References

AASW (2000) <i>Policy and procedures for establishing eligibility for membership of the AASW</i>. Canberra: Australian Association of Social Workers. [Retrieved July 7, 2006, from http://www.aasw.asn.au/adobe/becomeamember/membership_eligibility_2000.pdf] <a target="_blank" href='http://www.aasw.asn.au/adobe/becomeamember/membership_eligibility_2000.pdf'>http://www.aasw.asn.au/adobe/becomeamember/membership_eligibility_2000.pdf</a>\nAASW (2003) <i>Practice standards for social workers: Achieving outcomes. Canberra: Australian Association of Social Workers</i>. [Retrieved May 10, 2007 from http://www.aasw.asn.au/adobe/publications/Practice_Standards_Final_Oct_2003.pdf] <a target="_blank" href='http://www.aasw.asn.au/adobe/publications/Practice_Standards_Final_Oct_2003.pdf'>http://www.aasw.asn.au/adobe/publications/Practice_Standards_Final_Oct_2003.pdf</a>\nBridgman, P. and Davis, G. (2004) <i>The Australian Social Policy Handbook</i>. (3rd ed.) Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin\nBriggs, L. and Kane, R. (2000) Ethics in fieldwork. in L. Cooper and L. Briggs (Eds.), <i>Fieldwork in the Human Services</i>. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin (pp. 131-144)\nCleak, H., and Wilson, J. (2004) <i>Making the Most of Field Placement</i>. Southbank, Victoria: Thomson\nComeford, S.A. (2005) Engaging through learning, learning through engaging: An alternative approach to professional learning about human diversity. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 24, 1, 113-135\nCooper, L. and Briggs, L. (2000) Overview of teaching, learning and assessment in the field. In L. Cooper and L. Briggs (Eds.), <i>Fieldwork in the Human Services</i>. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin (pp. 3-9)\nCooper, S. and Patton, R. (2001) <i>Writing Logically, Thinking Critically</i>. (3rd ed.) New York: Longman\nECU (2006) <i>Social Work Fieldwork Manual</i>. Bunbury, WA: Edith Cowan University, Faculty of Regional Professional Studies, Social Work Programme\nEisenberg, M., Heycox, K., and Hughes, L. (1996) Fear of the personal: Assessing students in practicum. <i>Australian Social Work</i>, <i>49</i>, 4, 33-40\nGarthwait, C.I. (2005) <i>The Social Work Practicum: A guide and workbook for students</i> (3rd ed.) Boston: Pearson Education\nGitterman, A., and Gitterman, N.P. (1979) Social work student evaluation: Format and method. <i>Journal of Education for Social Work</i>, <i>15</i>, 3, 103-109\nHam, C. and Hill, M. (1993) <i>The Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State</i>. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf\nHopkins, J. and Cooper, L. (2000) The competency approach. in L. Cooper and L. Briggs (Eds.), <i>Fieldwork in the Human Services</i>. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin (pp. 55-69)\nHughes, L. and Heycox, K. (2000) Assessment of performance. in L. Cooper and L. Briggs (Eds.), <i>Fieldwork in the Human Services</i>. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin (pp. 84-95)\nJones, A. and May, J. (1992) <i>Working in Human Service Organisations: A critical introduction</i>. South Melbourne: Longman\nKahn, A.J. (1969) <i>Theory and Practice of Social Planning</i>. New York: Russell Sage Foundation\nKimber, S. (1982) Competence is incompetence: Evaluation of a social work student’s practice. <i>Contemporary Social Work Education</i>, <i>5</i>, 2, 93-104\nKiser, P. (2000) <i>Getting the most from your Human Service Internship: Learning from experience</i>. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole\nLishman, J. (2002) Personal and professional development. in R. Adams, L. Dominelli and M. Payne (Eds.), <i>Social Work: Themes issues and critical debates</i>. (2nd ed.) Basingstoke: Palgrave (pp. 95-108)\nMunson, R., Conway, D., and Black, A. (2004) <i>The Elements of Reasoning</i>. (4th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning\nO’Connor, I., Wilson, J., and Setterlund, D. (2003) <i>Social Work and Welfare Practice</i>. (4th ed,) Frenchs Forrest, NSW: Pearson Education Australia\nRogers, G. and Langevin, P. (2000) Negotiated learning contracts. in L. Cooper and L. Briggs (Eds.), <i>Fieldwork in the Human Services</i>. St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin (pp. 216-226)\nWall, T.F. (2001) <i>Thinking Critically about Philosophical Problems: A modern introduction</i>. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.\n

Downloads

Published

2012-12-20

How to Cite

Hodgson, D., & Walford, H. (2012). Planning for learning and learning about planning in social work fieldwork. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v7i1.343

Issue

Section

Articles