Blending differing teaching methods to support student learning

Authors

  • Ruth Forbes
  • Marie Irwin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v9i1.388

Keywords:

lectures, elearning, groupwork, educational reflection, professional development

Abstract

This paper discusses the philosophy, principles, design and evolving evaluation of the Learning for Practice 1 module which forms part of the new social work degree programme. Attention focuses upon the academic component of the module, in effect the theories and methods teaching. The blended approach will be outlined describing the main methods of delivery which combined traditional and elearning approaches. The three main styles of delivery; traditional lectures, online activity and group sessions are measured against a backdrop of established educational literature: The student voice is presented via a review undertaken at the end of the fourth year of the course life.

References

Ballantyne, N. (2008) Multimedia learning and social work education. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 27, 6, 613-622\nBecker, S. and Henricksen, T. (2006) <i>In Search of the Next Generation Online learning Environment</i>. <a target="_blank" href='http://www.ectolearning.com/ecto2/static/Ecto%20-%20Next%20Generation%20Learning.pdf'>http://www.ectolearning.com/ecto2/static/Ecto%20-%20Next%20Generation%20Learning.pdf.</a>\nBolton, G. (2005) (2nd ed) <i>Reflective Practice: Writing and professional development</i>. London: Sage\nCherney, I. (2008) The effects of active learning on students’ memories for course content. <i>Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 2, 152-171</i>\nClapton, G., Cree, V., Allan, M., Edwards, R., Forbes, R., Irwin, M., Paterson, W., and Perry, R. (2006) Grasping the nettle: Integrating learning and practice revisited and re-imagined. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 25, 6, <i>645-656</i>\nDoel, M. and Sawdon, C. (2001) What makes for successful groupwork? A survey of agencies in the UK. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 31, 435-451 (cited in Preston-Shoot, M (2007) <i>Effective Groupwork</i>. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan)\nDewey, J. (1938) <i>Experience and Education</i>, New York: Collier Books.\nFreire, P (1972) <i>Pedagogy of the Oppressed</i>. Harmonsworth: Penguin\nHoney, P. and Mumford, A. (2000) <i>The Learning Styles Questionnaire. Maidenhead:</i> Peter Honey\nKolb, D.A. (1984) <i>Experiencing Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development</i>. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.\nLaurillard, D. (2008) <i>Digital Technologies and their Role in Achieving Our Ambitions for Education</i>. London: Institute of Education\nMayes, J.T. and Fowler, C.J.H. (1999) Learning technology and usability: A framework for understanding courseware. <i>Interacting with Computers</i> 11, 485-497\nMcKendree, J. and Mayes, T. (1998) The Vicarious Learner: Supporting discussion and reuseable dialogues for on-line learners. in B. Pauling (Ed.) <i>The Changing Technologies of Learning: Reshaping the boundaries of the university</i>. <a target="_blank" href='http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/york/documents/resources/heca/heca_vu07.pdf'>http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/york/documents/resources/heca/heca_vu07.pdf</a>\nPayne, M. (2005) <i>Modern Social Work Theory</i>. (3rd ed.) Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan\nPearlman, B (2006) New Skills for a New Century: Project Based learning teaches kids the collaborative and critical thinking abilities they’ll need to compete. <i>Edutopia Magazine</i>. cited in S. Becker and T. Henricksen <i>In Search of the Next Generation Online Learning Environment.</i> <a target="_blank" href='http://www.ectolearning.com/ecto2/static/Ecto%20-%20Next%20Generation%20Learning.pdf'>http://www.ectolearning.com/ecto2/static/Ecto%20-%20Next%20Generation%20Learning.pdf</a>\nPrensky, M. (2006) <i>‘Don’t bother me Mom, I’m Learning!’ How computer and video games are preparing your kids for twenty-first century success and how you can help!</i> St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.\nPreston-Shoot, M (2007) <i>Effective Groupwork</i>. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan\nReigeluth, C.M. (Ed.). (1999). <i>Instructional-design Theories and Models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2)</i>. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.\nRogers, C. (1980) <i>A Way of Being</i>. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin\nRogers, C. and Freiberg, H.J. (1993) <i>Freedom to Learn</i>. New York: Merrill\nSalmon G (2003) <i>E-tivities</i>. London: Kogan Page.\nSchon, D.A, (1987). <i>Educating the Reflective Practitioner</i>. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass\nSegrave, S and Holt, D. (2003) Contemporary learning environment: designing e-learning for education in the professions. <i>Distance Education</i>, 24, 1, 8-24\nStandards in Social Work Education (SiSWE). <a target="_blank" href='http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2003/01/16202/17015'>http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2003/01/16202/17015</a>\nStead, D. (2005) A review of the one-minute paper. <i>Active Learning in Higher Education</i>, 6, 2, 118-131\nTapscott, D. (1998) <i>Growing up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation</i>. New York: McGraw-Hill\n

Downloads

Published

2012-12-20

How to Cite

Forbes, R., & Irwin, M. (2012). Blending differing teaching methods to support student learning. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v9i1.388

Issue

Section

Articles