The journey towards professionalism in social work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v9i3.403Keywords:
assessment, development, practice learning, competence framework, National Occupational Standards, outcomesAbstract
Achieving clear evidence of competent professional practice for social work students is a challenge for social work educators. This issue became more critical in the UK with the onset of the DipSW outcome-based competence framework which, we argue, limited the process of learning and development for students and practice assessor assessments. This article argues that the (unintended) consequence of this approach is a less analytic process for developing practice and consequently, for many students, less well developed assessment and reflective skills. Therefore, the article attempts to explain these issues and offers an example of a process at Brunel University that we believe was significant in helping students develop much better analytical and reflective skills than had happened with the DipSW and is happening with the National Occupational Standards currently. We believe this process enables educators to be more confident about their assessment of students’ ability to practice at an appropriate standard and to make that recommendation.
References
Biggs, J. (2003) Teaching for Quality Learning at University. (2nd ed.) Maidenhead: Open University Press.nCentral Council for Education and Training in Social Work (1989). Requirements and Regulations for the Diploma in Social Work, CCETSW Paper 30, London: CCETSWnCentral Council for Education and Training in Social Work (1995). Assuring Quality in the Diploma in Social Work – 1, Rules and Requirements for the DipSW. Revised 1995, London: CCETSWnCozolino, L (2006) The Neuroscience of Human Relationship: Attachment and the developing brain, New York: W.W. Norton.nDepartment of Health (2002) Requirements for Social Work Training. London: Department of HealthnEntwistle, N., (2001) Conceptions, Styles and Approaches within Higher Education: Analytic Abstractions and Everyday Experiences. In R. Sternberg, & R-J. Zhang (eds) Perspectives on Thinking, Learning and Cognitive Styles pp. 103-136.nHamer, M (2006) The Barefoot Helper: Mindfulness and creativity in social work and the helping professions, Lyme Regis, Russell House PublishingnHorner, N. (2006) What is Social Work? Context and Perspective. 2nd edition: Exeter: Learning MattersnKnott, C. and Scragg, T. (eds) (2007) Reflective Practice in Social Work. Exeter: Learning MattersnMarton, F. & Saljo, R. (1997) Approaches to Learning, in F. Marton, D. Housel and D. Entwistle (eds) The Experience, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic PressnMartyn, H. (ed) (2000) Developing Reflective Practice. Bristol: The Policy PressnMilner, J. and O’Byrne, P. (2002). Assessment in Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillannO’Hagan, K (1996, revised 2007) Competence in Social Work Practice, London: Jessica Kingsley PublishersnParker, J. and Bradley, G. (2007) Social Work Practice: Assessment, Planning, Intervention and Review, 2nd edition. Exeter: Learning MattersnParker, J. (2004) Effective Practice Learning in Social Work. Exeter: Learning MattersnSchön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple SmithnSchön (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.nSchön, D. (2002) From technical rationality to reflection-in-action. in H. Harrison, F. Reeve, A. Hanson and J. Clarke (eds) Supporting Lifelong Learning. Volume one. Perspectives on Learning. London: Routledge/Open University Press.nThompson, N. (2009) Practising Social Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillannTOPSS UK, (2002) The National Occupational Standards for Social Work, Leeds: TOPSSn
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright lies with the journal. Enquiries regarding reproduction should be sent in the first place to enquiries@whitingbirch.net.
