How far does a whole family approach make a difference

Authors

  • Nigel Malin
  • Jane Tunmore
  • Angela Wilcock

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v17i2.549

Keywords:

<i>outcome evaluation</i>, <i>whole family</i>, <i>family intervention</i>, <i>multi-disciplinary working</i>, <i>service delivery</i>

Abstract

This article reports findings from a study to support the inclusion of a Whole Family Approach (WFA) within policy and provision for children and families conducted in one large northern local authority in England. In recent years mainly from research and good practice elsewhere WFA had been seen to offer opportunities to focus on shared needs, developing strengths and assessing risk factors. The principal aim was to design an evaluation framework to enable partners to assess and measure progress in the delivery of a WF strategy. Methods included individual interviews with professionals and managers (N=22) on knowledge and experience of WFA, for example their understanding of multi-agency work, along with their evidence of adopting a WFA approach. Findings demonstrate the process of how an evaluation framework was constructed based on adapting preexisting outcome-focused 'models' used to evaluate functions of partnership-working along with indigenous sources. The first type of 'model' entailed a number of dimensions including Vision and Strategy, Partnership Dynamics, Impact and Performance Measurement. The second had two key features: it drew upon the idea of realist evaluation, a paradigm used by practitioner researchers where the focus is upon identifying mechanisms that explain how an action affects outcomes in particular contexts; and the 'model' had been applied extensively to an analysis of family intervention projects. What has emerged is an evaluation framework characterised by a number of key 'signifiers' each of which is populated by a series of questions. The framework embraces introducing changes to the culture of planning and delivering services, placing building family strengths at centre-stage.

References

Aldridge, J, Shute, J, Ralphs, R and Medina, M (2009) Blame the parents? Challenges for parent-focused programmes for families of gang-involved young people. <i>Children & Society</i>, 25, 5, 371-381\nAtkinson, M (2005) The development of an evaluation framework for partnership working, <i>Journal of Business Research Methodology</i>, 3, I, 1-10\nAtkinson, M (2006) The Development of an Evaluation Framework for Partnership Working. <i>British Journal of Management</i>, 7, 1, 75-86\nBatty, E and Flint, J (2012) Conceptualising the contexts, mechanisms and outcomes of intensive family intervention projects. <i>Social Policy and Society</i>, 11:3, 345-358\nBatty, E (2014) Learning and soft outcomes: Evidence from intensive intervention projects. <i>Social Policy and Society</i>, 13, 3, 357-369\nBlamey, A and MacKenzie, M (2007) Theories of change and realistic evaluation: Peas in a pod or apples and oranges? <i>Evaluation</i>, 13, 4, 439-55\nBoyle, D, Coote, A, Sherwood, C, and Slay, J (2010) <i>Right Here, Right Now: Taking Co-production into the Mainstream.</i> Discussion Paper: NESTA www.nesta.org.uk <a target="_blank" href='www.nesta.org.uk'>www.nesta.org.uk</a>\nBrown, G (2009) Speech to Labour Party Conference, Brighton, 29th September 2009. <i>The Guardian</i>. [http;//www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/september/29] <a target="_blank" href='http;//www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/september/29'>http;//www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/september/29</a>\nChurchill, H (2012) Family support and the Coalition: Retrenchment, refocusing and restructuring, <i>Social Policy Review</i> 24, 35-54 in Kilkey, M, Ramia, G and Farnsworth, K (Eds). Bristol: Policy Press\nDepartment for Children, Schools and Families (2008) <i>Youth Task Force Action Plan: Give respect, get respect, youth matters.</i> London: DCSF\nDepartment for Children, Schools and Families (2010) <i>Disadvantaged Communities to Get More Support</i>. London: DCSF\nDepartment for Communities and Local Government (2012) <i>Working with Troubled Families: A guide to the evidence and good practice</i>. London: DCSF\nDillane, J, Hill, M, Bannister, J and Scott, S (2001) <i>Evaluation of the Dundee Families Project.</i> Edinburgh; Scottish Executive, Dundee City Council and NCH Action for Children\nDixon, J, Schneider, V, Lloyd, C, Reeves, A, White, C, Tomaszewski, W, Green, R and Ireland, E (2010) <i>Monitoring and Evaluation of Family Interventions</i>. London: Department for Education\nFlint, J (2011) The role of sanctions in intensive support and rehabilitation: Rhetoric, rationalities and realities. <i>British Journal of Criminal Justice</i>, 9, 1/2, 55-67\nFlint, J, Batty, E, Parr, S, Nixon, J and Sanderson, D (2011) <i>Evaluation of Intensive Intervention Projects</i>. London: Department for Education\nFlint, J, Batty, E, Parr, S, Casey, R and Nixon, J (2011) <i>Evaluation of Rochdale Family Project</i>. Sheffield: CRESR [www.shu.ac.uk/research/cresr/rochdale-families.html] <a target="_blank" href='www.shu.ac.uk/research/cresr/rochdale-families.html'>www.shu.ac.uk/research/cresr/rochdale-families.html</a>\nForrester, D, Kershaw, S, Moss, H and Hughes, L (2008) Communication skills in child protection: How do social workers talk to parents? <i>Child and Family Social Work</i>, 13, 41-51\nGambetta, D (1988) <i>Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations</i>. Oxford: Blackwell\nGarrett, P.M (2007) ‘Sinbin Solutions’: The ‘pioneer’ projects for ‘problem families’ and the forgetfulness of social policy research. <i>Critical Social Policy</i>, 27, 2, 203-30\nGerdes, K (2011) Importance of Empathy for Social Work Practice: integrating new science, Social Work, 56, 2, 141-8\nGregg, D (2010) <i>Family Intervention Projects: A classic case of policy-based evidence</i>. London: Centre for Crime and Justice Studies\nHM Treasury (2011) <i>Budget 2011.</i> (HC 836) London: HM Treasury\nHome Office (2010) <i>Drug Strategy 2010 Reducing Demand, Restricting Supply, Building Recovery: Supporting people to live a drug free life.</i> London: Home Office [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/drug-strategy-2010--2] <a target="_blank" href='https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/drug-strategy-2010--2'>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/drug-strategy-2010--2</a>\nHome Office (2011) <i>More Effective Responses to Anti-Social Behaviour.</i> London: Home Office\nJones, A, Please, N, Quilgars, D and Sanderson, D (2006) <i>Addressing Anti-Social Behaviour: An independent evaluation of Shelter Inclusion Project.</i> London: Shelter\nKahan, B (2008) <i>Excerpts from Review of Evaluation Frameworks.</i> Reina, SK: Kael Consulting/Saskatchewan Ministry of Education [http://driverspack.org/download/review-of-evaluation-frameworks-idm-best-practi/] <a target="_blank" href='http://driverspack.org/download/review-of-evaluation-frameworks-idm-best-practi/]'>http://driverspack.org/download/review-of-evaluation-frameworks-idm-best-practi/]</a>\nKalil, A (2003) <i>Family Resilience and Good Child Outcomes: A review of the literature</i>. Wellington. New Zealand: Centre for Social Research and Evaluation\nKendall, S, Rodger, J and Palmer, H (2010) <i>Redesigning Provision for Families with Multiple Problems: An assessment of the early impact of different local approaches</i>. London: Department for Education\nKnapp, M, Bauer, A, Perkins, M, and Snell, T (2011) <i>Building Community Capacity: Making an economic case</i>. London: Think Family Local Act Personal Partnership\nMacKay, R (2003) Family resilience and good child outcomes: An overview of the research literature. <i>Social Policy Journal of New Zealand</i>, 20, 98-118\nMalin, N and Morrow, G (2009) Evaluating the role of the Sure Start Plus Adviser in providing integrated support for pregnant teenagers and young parents. <i>Health and Social Care in the Community</i>, 17, 5, 495-503\nMalin, N and Morrow, G (2012) <i>Evaluating Sure Start: Inter-professionalism and parental involvement in local programmes</i>, (revised ed.) London: Whiting and Birch\nMinistry of Justice (2010) <i>Breaking the Cycle: Effective punishment, rehabilitation and sentencing of offenders.</i> London: Ministry of Justice\nMorris, K and Featherstone, B (2010) Investing in children, regulating parents, thinking family: a decade of tensions and contradictions. <i>Social Policy and Society</i>, 9, 4, 557-66\nMurray, L and Barnes, M (2010) Have families been rethought? ethic of care, family and ‘whole family’ approaches. <i>Social Policy and Society</i>, 9, 4, 533-44\nNixon, J, Parr, S, Hunter, C, Myers, S, Sanderson, D and Whittle, S (2006) <i>Anti-Social Behaviour Intensive Family Support Projects: An evaluation of six pioneering projects</i>. London: Dept for Communities and Local Government\nNixon, J, Parr, S, Hunter, C, Myers, S, Sanderson, D, and Whittle, S (2008) <i>The Longer Term Outcomes for Families who had worked with Intensive Family Support Projects</i>, London: Dept for Communities and Local Government\nPawson, H, Davidson, E, Sosenko, F, Flint, J, Nixon, J, and Sanderson, D (2009) <i>Evaluation of Intensive Family Support Projects in Scotland</i>. Edinburgh: Scottish Government\nPutnam, R (2000) <i>Bowling Alone</i>. New York: Simon & Schuster\nQuinton, D (2004) <i>Supporting Parents: Messages from research</i>. London: Jessica Kingsley.\nRenshaw, J and Wellings, S (2010) Catch22 Intensive Intervention Projects: Interim Report, Catch 22.\n<i>Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Allied Personal Social Services</i> (Seebohm Committee) (1968) Cmnd 3703. London: HMSO\nRespect Task Force (2010) <i>Respect Action Plan</i>. London: Respect Task Force\nSennett, R (2003) <i>Respect: The formation of character in a world of inequality</i>. London: Allen Lane\nSquires, H and Tappenden, P (2011) <i>Mathematical Modelling and its Application to Social Care</i>. SSCR Methods Review 7. London: NIHR School for Social Care Research\nSullivan, H and Skelcher, C (2002) <i>Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in public services</i>. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan\nTaylor, B (2010) <i>Professional Decision-Making in Social Work Practice</i> <a target="_blank" href='www.learningmatters.co.uk'>www.learningmatters.co.uk</a>\nWeick, K (1995) <i>Sensemaking in Organizations.</i> London; Sage\nWhite, C, Warrener, M, Reeves, A, and La Valle, I (2008) <i>Family Intervention Projects: An evaluation of their design, set-up and early outcomes</i>. London: DCSF/Communities and Local Government\n

Downloads

Published

2014-10-10

How to Cite

Malin, N., Tunmore, J., & Wilcock, A. (2014). How far does a whole family approach make a difference. Social Work and Social Sciences Review, 17(2), 63-92. https://doi.org/10.1921/swssr.v17i2.549

Issue

Section

Articles