Whose students are they anyway?


  • Joanna Rawles




failing students, practice educators, university-practice partnerships, collaboration, practice placement


This paper draws on case study research which explored the support needs of those involved in social work practice learning in an English local authority. Data was collected through questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews with 27 practice educators, students and team managers. Although issues relating to failing students were not intended as the primary focus of the research, this theme dominates the findings from practice educators and team managers. Practice educators cited problematic placements as a key factor in their decision not to continue in the role.

A significant contributory factor in the negative impact of the failing experience is the participants’ dissatisfaction with the attitude and approach of the students’ universities. Particularly striking is the perception that universities present an obstruction to a fail decision resulting in students being passed who possibly should not do so. This paper considers whether the different institutional perceptions of the social work student and the organisations’ role in relation to them could be at the root of these difficulties in collaboration and fuel the ‘failure to fail’ debate.


Basnett, F. and Sheffield, D. (2010) The impact of social work student failure upon practice educators. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 40, 2119-2136.\nBell, L. and Webb, S. (1992) The invisible art of teaching for practice: Social workers’ perceptions of taking students on placement. <i>Social Work Education</i> 11, 1, 684-696.\nBIS (2011) <i>Higher Education: Students at the Heart of the System</i>. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.\nBurgess, R., Phillips, R. and Skinner, K. (1998) Practice placements that go wrong. <i>Journal of Practice Teaching</i>, 1, 2, 48-64.\nClapton, G. (2006) Grasping the nettle. <i>Social Work Education</i> 25, 6\nCowburn, M., Nelson, P. and Williams, J. (2000) Assessment of social work students: Standpoint and strong objectivity. <i>Social Work Education</i> 19, 6, 627-637.\nDuffy, K. (2003) <i>Failing students: A qualitative study of factors that influence the decisions regarding assessment of students’ competence in practice</i> <a target="_blank" href='http://www.nmc-uk.org/Documents/Archived%20Publications/1Research%20papers/Kathleen_Duffy_Failing_Students2003.pdf'>http://www.nmc-uk.org/Documents/Archived%20Publications/1Research%20papers/Kathleen_Duffy_Failing_Students2003.pdf</a>\nEngestrom, Y. (2001) Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. <i>Journal of Education and Work</i>, 14, 1.\nEngestrom, Y. (2011) Activity theory and learning at work. in M. Mallock (Ed.) <i>The Sage Handbook of Workplace Learning</i>. London: Sage.\nFinch, J. (2010) <i>Can’t Fail, Won’t Fail: Why practice assessors find it difficult to fail social work students: a qualitative study of practice assessors’ experiences of assessing marginal or failing social work students</i>. Doctoral thesis, University of Sussex. www.sussex.ac.uk [accessed 1/12/11]. <a target="_blank" href='http://www.sussex.ac.uk'>www.sussex.ac.uk</a>\nFuller, A. and Unwin, L. (2011) Workplace learning and the organization. in M. Mallock (Ed.) <i>The Sage Handbook of Workplace Learning</i>. London: Sage.\nFurness, S (2011) Gender at work: Characteristics of ‘failing’ social work students’ <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 22, 3, 480-499\nFurness, S. and Gilligan, P. (2004) Fit for purpose: Issues from practice placements, practice teaching and the assessment of student’s practice. <i>Social Work Education</i> 23, 4, 465-479.\nGSCC (2005) <i>Post-Qualificaiton Framework for Social Work Education and Training</i>. London: GSCC.\nKonkola, R., Tuomi-Grohn, T., Lambert, P. and Ludvigsen, S. (2007) Promoting learning and transfer between school and workplace. <i>Journal of Education and Work</i> 20, 2, 211-228.\nLave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) <i>Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nLindsay, J. and Tompsett, H. (1998). <i>Careers of Practice Teachers in the London and South East Region</i>. London: CCETSW.\nLindsay, J. and Walton, A. (2000) <i>Workforce Planning and The Strategic Deployment of Practice Teachers in Approved Agencies</i>: London: CCETSW.\nMorley, L. (2003) <i>Quality and Power in Higher Education</i>. Maidenhead: Open University Press.\nParker, J. (2010) When things go wrong! Placement disruption and termination: Power and student perspectives. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 40, 983-999.\nShapton, M. (2006) Failing to fail students in the caring professions: Is the assessment process failing professionals? <i>Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning</i> 7, 2, 39-54.\nShardlow, S. Nixon, S. and Rogers, J. (2002) The motivation of practice teachers: decisions relating to involvement in practice learning provision. <i>Learning in Health and Social Care , 1</i>, 2, 67-74.\nSharpe, M. and Danbury, H. (1999) <i>The Management of Failing DipSW Students</i>. Aldershot: Ashgate\nSharpe, M. (2000) The assessment of incompetence: Practice teachers’ support needs when working with failing DipSW students. <i>Journal of Practice Teaching in Health and Social Work</i>, 2, 9, 5-19.\nSWRB (2011) <i>Effective Partnership Working: Key principles of partnership and collaboration</i>. <a target="_blank" href='http://www.education.gov.uk/swrb/employers'>www.education.gov.uk/swrb/employers</a>\nTsui, A. and Law, D. (2007) Learning as boundary-crossing in school-university partnership. <i>Teaching and Teacher Education</i>, 23, 1289-1301.\nWenger, E. (1998) <i>Communities of Practice</i>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nWilson, G. (2000) Developing practice learning: The practice teachers’ perspective. <i>Journal of Practice Teaching in Health and Social Work , 3</i>, 2, 44-62.\nYin, R. (2009) <i>Case Study Research</i>. London: Sage.\n




How to Cite

Rawles, J. (2013). Whose students are they anyway?. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 11(3), 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v11i3.273