A model to support the development of courtroom skills


  • Clare Seymour




social worker, social work students, courtroom skills, model for skills development, observation and shadowing, reflection, evidence, cross-examination, values


Summary: There is widespread interest on the part of social work degree students in developing their courtroom skills within a framework of learning about social work law, but it is often not until they qualify and are ‘thrown in at the deep end’ that anyone gives any serious thought to the need for preparation and skills development in this area. As a result, students and newly-qualified social workers are frequently apprehensive about court work, which means that they do not always do themselves, or the people who use social work services, justice when faced with court involvement. This article offers a model for practice assessors to use with students in agencies where court work is undertaken, and encourages skills development against a foundation of critical analysis and reflection. The term ‘practice assessor’ has been adopted by the General Social Care Council in preference to the previously widely-used term ‘practice teacher’ to describe the person responsible for facilitating learning and supervising and assessing social work students in practice. Within this model, ‘practice assessor’ is interchangeable with ‘practice teacher’, and indeed most of the suggested learning activities primarily involve a facilitative or teaching, rather than an assessment, role.


Beckett, C., McKeigue, B. and Taylor, H (2007) Coming to conclusions: Social workers’ perception of the decision-making process in care proceedings. <i>Child and Family Social Work, 12, 1, 54</i>\nBond, T. and Sandhu, A (2005) <i>Therapists in Court: Providing evidence and supporting witnesses</i>. London: Sage\nBrammer, A. (2007) <i>Social Work Law.</i> (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education\nCooper, P. (2006) <i>Reporting to the Court under the Children Act.</i> (2nd ed.) London: Stationery Office\nCull, L-A. and Roche, J. (Eds.) (2001) <i>The Law and Social Work</i>. Basingstoke: Palgrave\nDickens, J. (2004) Risks and responsibilities: The role of the local authority lawyer in child care cases. <i>Child and Family Law Quarterly</i>, 16, 17\nDickens, J. (2005) The ‘epitome of reason’: the challenges for lawyers and social workers in care proceedings, <i>International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family</i>, 19, 73-101\nDickens, J. (2006) Care, control and change in child care proceedings: dilemmas for social workers, managers and lawyers. <i>Child and Family Social Work</i>, 11, 1, 23-32\nGeneral Social Care Council (2002) <i>Code of Practice for Social Care Workers</i>. London: GSCC\nKnott, C and Scragg, T. (Eds.) (2007) <i>Reflective Practice in Social Work</i>, Exeter: Learning Matters\nParker, J. (2004) <i>Effective Practice Learning in Social Work</i>. Exeter: Learning Matters\nPreston-Shoot, M. (2000) Making connections in the curriculum: law and professional practice. in R. Pierce and J. Weinstein (eds) <i>Innovative Education and Training for Care Professionals: A Provider’s Guide</i>. London: Jessica Kingsley\nQuality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA) (2000) <i>Social Policy and Administration and Social Work Subject Benchmark Statements</i>. London: QAA\nSeymour C. and Seymour R. (2007) <i>Courtroom Skills for Social Workers</i>. Exeter: Learning Matters\nSocial Care Institute for Excellence (SCIE) (2005) <i>Teaching, Learning and Assessment of Law in Social Work Education</i>. Bristol: Policy Press\nThompson, N. (Ed.) (2002) <i>Loss and Grief</i>. Basingstoke: Palgrave.\n




How to Cite

Seymour, C. (2012). A model to support the development of courtroom skills. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 7(3), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v7i3.349