Seselelame: Reflective team approach to practice
AbstractAbstract: This paper focuses on an awareness of self through the integration of Seselelame Reflective Team Approach to Practice (SRTAP), a model I develop that was adapted from Anderson’s systemic reflective team approach. An understanding of how SRTAP enhances the quality of practice of social workers is explored. Approaching this task from a practice-based standpoint I draw from my experience and practice. I explore how the concept of SRTAP was embedded in a local social work context; I explain and illustrate the value of bringing forth an awareness of self through the use of feeling in the body to practice, inviting an appreciation of the value of practical wisdom through SRTAP.
The narratives of practitioners offer examples of the effectiveness of the SRTAP on casework (that is, tasks involving plans or ideas, solving problems or making decisions). I discuss conditions, rationale and guidance needed to achieve and sustain the benefits of SRTAP.
Taking feedback from practitioners, my experience and observation I suggest that SRTAP creates a blend between intuitive and analytical ways of being in practice, contributing practice competence through an exploration of self as a resource when dealing with complex relational dynamics. When I use the word ‘self’ in this paper, I refer to felt responses in terms of feelings in the body.
Andersen, T. (2002) Crossroads: Tom Andersen in conversation with Per Jensen. In H. Anderson and P. Jensen (Eds.) Innovations in the Reflecting Process. London: Karnac
Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Mind and Nature. New York: Ballantine Books
Collins, E; and Daly, E. (2011) Decision making and social work in Scotland: The role of evidence and practice wisdom, Glasgow: IRISS
Forrester, D., Westlake, D., McCann, M., Thurnham, A., Shefer, G., Glynn, G., and Kilian, M. (2013). Final report of a comparative study of practice and the factors shaping it in three local authorities. Tilda Goldberg Centre
Geurts, K. (2000) Culture and the Senses. Bodily Ways of Knowing in an African Community. University of California Press. London and California
Krasue, B (2012) Culture and Reflexivity in Systemic Psychotherapy: Mutual Perspectives (Systemic Thinking and Practice Series). London. Karnac Books Klein, W.C., and Bloom, M. (1995) Practice Wisdom. Social Work, 40, 6, 799-807
Jude, J. (2013) Family Systemic therapy in the home: Reigniting the fire. Unpublished PhD thesis
Jude, J, and Regan, S. (2010) An exploration of reflective practice in a social care team: a qualitative review. Children’s Workforce Development Council. Institute of Education University of Education of London
Maturana, H. R. and Varela, F.J. (1987) The tree of knowledge: the Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston: Shambhala
Munro, E. (2004). The impact of audit on social work practice, British Journal of Social Work, 34, 8, 1073-1095
Munro, E. (2010) Learning to Reduce Risk in Child Protection, British Journal of Work, 40, 4, 135-1151
Pearce, W. B. (1994) Interpersonal Communication: Making Social Worlds. New York: Harper Collins
Preston-shoot, M. (2010) Changing learning and learning change: making a difference in education, policy and practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 17, 1, 9-23
Rober, P. (2005). Family therapy as a dialogue of living persons. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 385–397
Seikkula, J., and Trimble, D (2005) Healing Elements of Therapeutic Conversation: Dialogue as an Embodiment of Love. Fam Proc, 44:461-475,
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books
Sheet-Johstone, M. (2009) The Corporeal Turn: An Interdisciplinary Reader. Exeter: Imprint Academic
White, M. (1995) Re-Authoring Lives: Interviews and Essays. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.