Student Perception of Skills and Simulation Delivery within an Undergraduate Nursing Curriculum.
The first of a series of papers looking at the creation and introduction of a Skills and Simulation Delivery Framework.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v18i3.1715Abstract
Introduction
The existing delivery method for skills training is very task focused and delivered in large groups with limited time for actual ‘hands on’ practice of skills. Simulation was only included, sporadically, within the curriculum.
Methods
A questionnaire was designed to ascertain the student’s existing level of experience in skills and simulation, in addition to their opinion as to how effective the current method of delivery was in relation to a positive learning experience, and generation of knowledge. Their viewpoint was also sought as to any thoughts they may have in relation to changing the delivery of skills and simulation.
Results
The results demonstrated that, overall, there was a negative response from the students in relation to the current delivery of skills and simulation.
Conclusion
The study identified further areas for research in relation to the delivery and integration of skills and simulation within a pre-registration nursing curriculum.
Key Words
Nursing education, simulation-based education
References
References
Al-Ghareeb, A.Z., Cooper, S.J. & McKenna, L.G. (2017). Anxiety and Clinical Performance in Simulated Setting in Undergraduate Health Professionals Education: An Integrative Review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. [Online]. 13 (10). p.pp. 478–491. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139917300014. [Accessed: 4 November 2020].
Bruce, R., Levett-Jones, T. & Courtney-Pratt, H. (2019). Transfer of Learning From University-Based Simulation Experiences to Nursing Students’ Future Clinical Practice: An Exploratory Study. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. [Online]. 35. p.pp. 17–24. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187613991930091X. [Accessed: 4 November 2020].
Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T. & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-Based Learning in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research. [Online]. 90 (4). p.pp. 499–541. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544. [Accessed: 1 October 2020].
Creswell, J.W., Klassen, A.C., Plano Clark, V.L. and Smith, K.C., 2011. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda (Maryland): National Institutes of Health, 2013, pp.541-545.
Fetters, M.D., and Freshwater, D. (2015) "Publishing a methodological mixed methods research article." J. Mixed Methods Res., 9, pp. 203-213.
Ferguson, J., Astbury, J., Willis, S., Silverthorne, J. & Schafheutle, E. (2020). Implementing, embedding and sustaining simulation-based education: What helps, what hinders. Medical Education. [Online]. 54 (10). p.pp. 915–924. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/medu.14182. [Accessed: 1 October 2020].
Gray, S., Wheat, M., Christensen, M. & Craft, J. (2019). Snaps+: Peer-to-peer and academic support in developing clinical skills excellence in under-graduate nursing students: An exploratory study. Nurse Education Today. [Online]. 73. p.pp. 7–12. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691718308153. [Accessed: 4 November 2020].
Manalayil J, Muston A, Ball A, Chevalier D. 1HR ON-CALL - Using Simulated ON-CALL to Underpin Experiential Learning in Final Year Medical Students. J Eur CME. 2020 Oct 25;9(1):1832749. doi: 10.1080/21614083.2020.1832749. PMID: 33224625; PMCID: PM
Östlund, U., Kidd, L., Wengström, Y. and Rowa-Dewar, N., 2011. Combining qualitative and quantitative research within mixed method research designs: a methodological review. International journal of nursing studies, 48(3), pp.369-383.
Pawłowicz E, Kulesza M, Szymańska A, Masajtis-Zagajewska A, Bartczak M, Nowicki M. 'I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.'- incorporating high-fidelity medical simulation into the undergraduate nephrology course. Ren Fail. 2020 Nov 9;42(1):1184-1191. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2020.1847722. PMID: 33243066.
Riaz S, Jaradat AAK, Gutierrez R, Garadah TS. Outcome of Undergraduate Medical Education using Medical Simulation according to Students' Feedback. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2020 Aug;20(3):e310-e315. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2020.20.03.010. Epub 2020 Oct 5. PMID: 33110646; PMCID: PMC7574795.
Roh, Y.S., Jang, K.I. & Issenberg, S.B. (2020). Nursing students’ perceptions of simulation design features and learning outcomes: The mediating effect of psychological safety. Collegian. [Online]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769620300871. [Accessed: 4 November 2020].
Shearer, J.N. (2016). Anxiety, Nursing Students, and Simulation: State of the Science. Journal of Nursing Education. [Online]. 55 (10). p.pp. 551–554. Available from: https://www.healio.com/nursing/journals/jne/2016-10-55-10/{a4ba31e2-3063-4bd8-adaf-592e94579560}/anxiety-nursing-students-and-simulation-state-of-the-science. [Accessed: 4 November 2020].
Woda, A., Hansen, J., Paquette, M. & Topp, R. (2017). The impact of simulation sequencing on perceived clinical decision making. Nurse Education in Practice. [Online]. 26. p.pp. 33–38. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595317303876. [Accessed: 4 November 2020].