Blended Social Work Placements: New Opportunities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v20i1.1965

Keywords:

Social work placements, Covid-19, Loss, Connectivity, Flexible and creative solutions

Abstract

Social work student placements were significantly impacted over the past two years as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, but a ‘new normal’ of placement provision has started to emerge. This conference paper provides reflections on the experiences of social work education providers, placement providers and practice educators on the new opportunities that have been created as a result of flexible responses to the changing landscape of blended placement provision necessitated by the pandemic, which were gathered at two international workshops held virtually at academic conferences in 2021. The workshops identified common responses from higher education institutes (Higher Education Institutions) and practice educators, where loss and change created the need for connectivity and flexible and creative solutions. This article will present the themes identified within the teaching partnership as well as findings from the two workshops to enhance understanding of the sustainability of blended social work placement provision.

Author Biographies

Paula Beesley, Leeds Beckett University

Paula Beesley is a Senior Lecturer in Social Work in the School of Health and Community Studies.

Sue Taplin, University of Gloucestershire

Dr Sue Taplin is a Senior Lecturer in Social Work.

References

Ayala, J. (2009) Blended learning as a new approach to social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 2, 277-288

Beelsey, P. (2022) COVID-19 Pandemic: A Threat or an opportunity to fieldwork education in England?. in: R. Baikady, S. Sajid, V. Nadesan, and M. Rezaul Islam, (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Field Work Education in Social Work, India: Routledge (pp. 541-551)

Biggart, L., Ward, E., Cook. L. And Schofield, G. (2020) The team as a secure base: Promoting resilience and competence in child and family social work. Children and Youth Services Review, 83, 119-130

Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006) Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research In Psychology, 3, 2, 77-101

British Association of Social Workers (BASW) (2019) Practice Educator Professional Standards (PEPS) for Social Work. Retrieved from https://www.basw.co.uk/system/files/resources/181106_PEPS%20for%20Social%20Work_0.pdf

Cook, L., Zschomler, D., Biggart, L. and Carder, S. (2020) The team as a secure base revisited: Remote working and resilience among child and family social workers during COVID-19. Journal of Children’s Services, 15, 4, 259-266

de Boer, C., Campbell, S. & Hovey, A. (2011) When you come to a fork in the road, take it: Teaching social work practice using blended learning. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37, 3

Engel, R. & Schutt, R. (2017) The Practice of Research in Social Work. London: Sage

Kubler-Ross, E. (1969) On Death and Dying. London: Routledge

Lange, C. and Maynard, R. (2021) Embracing ‘un-certainty’ in practice education. in: D. Turner (Ed.) Social Work and Covid-19. Lessons for education and practice. St Albans, Critical Publishing (PP. 43-51)

Laurillard, D. (1993) Rethinking University Education. London: Routledge

Litvack, A., Bogo, M. & Mishna, F. (2010) Emotional reactions of students in field education: an exploratory study. Journal of Social Work Education. 46, 2, 227-243

McCafferty, P. (2004) Group supervision for social work students on placement: An international comparison. Journal of Practice Teaching in Health and Social Work, 5, 3, 56-72

Ray, K. & Shklarski, L. (2021) The impact of the transition from in-person to remote courses on MSW students due to COVID-19. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 41, 5, 550-562

Regehr, C., Stalker, C., Jacobs, M. & Pelech, W. (2001) The gatekeeper and the wounded healer. The Clinical Supervisor, 20, 1, 127-143

Singh, M.I., Doyle, K. and Wobbe-Veit, L. (2021) Social Work Field Education: Harnessing Technology to Connect Social Work Education and Practice During COVID-19. International Journal of Digital Society, 12, 1, 1695-1699

Singh Cooner, T. & Hickman, G. (2008) Child protection teaching: students’ experiences of a blended learning design. Social Work Education, 27(6, 647-657

Social Work England (SWE) (2020) Information for education providers and social work students. SWE, 27.3.20 https://www.socialworkengland.org.uk/coronavirus/information-for-education-providers-and-social-work-students/

Tedam, P. (2011) The MANDELA model of practice learning: An old present in new wrapping? Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 11, 2, 60-76

Waterhouse, T., McLagan, S. & Murr, A. (2011) From practitioner to practice educator: What supports and what hinders the development of confidence in teaching and assessing student social workers?. Practice: Social Work in Action, 23, 2, 95-110

Williams, S. and Rutter, L. (2019) The Practice Educator’s Handbook. London: Sage

Yeung, E., Newman, A. & Burke, B. (2021) Navigating relationships in practice learning: voices from practice educators. Social Work Education. 40, 3, 412-424

Downloads

Published

2023-04-17

How to Cite

Beesley, P., & Taplin, S. (2023). Blended Social Work Placements: New Opportunities. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v20i1.1965
Received 2022-06-30
Accepted 2023-02-09
Published 2023-04-17