Can practice educators be a ‘bridge’ between the academy and the practicum?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v12i3.294Keywords:
signature pedagogies, practice educators, social work education, SWRB, FrontlineAbstract
Debates exist about the separation of the academy and the practicum. The purpose of this study is to explore how its findings may contribute to this discussion. The unique pedagogies of the university and practice are explored and consideration is given to whether practice educators hold an intermediary role. A qualitative study of an undergraduate programme in England using thematic analysis was undertaken once ethical approval was given. Individual interviews and focus groups were used. A total of 48 participants were interviewed at two different points in time (2008 and 2011-2012). Although this is a limited small scale study not susceptible to generalisation it may be able to provide an analytic generalisation, which may be replicable with further studies.
The findings indicated practice educators struggled to act as a bridge because the academy and the practicum have conflicting and competing signature pedagogies. The contribution of this study is to the contemporary discussion on the SWRB changes and models such as Frontline.
References
All Party Parliamentary Group on Social Work (2013) <i>Inquiry into the state of social work report</i>. Birmingham: British Association of Social Work\nAnsells, M. (1996) Hermeneutic phenomenology: philosophical perspectives and current use in nursing research. <i>Journal of Advanced Nursing</i>. 23, 4, 705-713\nBraun V. and Clarke V., (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. <i>Qualitative Research in Psychology</i>, 3, 77-101\nThe College of Social Work (2013) <i>Practice educator professional standards and guidance</i>. Available at: <a target="_blank" href='http://www.tcsw.org.uk/uploadedFiles/TheCollege/Social_Work_Education/PEP%20standardsand%20guidance%20update%20 proofed%20and%20final%20021213.pdf'>http://www.tcsw.org.uk/uploadedFiles/TheCollege/Social_Work_Education/PEP%20standardsand%20guidance%20update%20 proofed%20and%20final%20021213.pdf</a>\nDelaney, P., E. (2007) The dichotomy of theory and practice: ethical reflections of a third-year student’s placement experience. <i>Ethics and Social Welfare</i>, 1, 1, 108-110\nDoel, M., Allmark, P., Conway, C., Cowburn, M., Flynn, M., Nelson, P., and Tod, A. (2010) Professional boundaries: Crossing a line or entering the shadows? <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 40, 1866-1889. Advance Access publication October 14, 2009\nEraut, M. (1994) <i>Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence</i>. London: RoutledgeFalmer\nFrancis, R. (2013) <i>Report of the Mid-Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public inquiry</i>. Available at: <a target="_blank" href='http://www.midstaffsinquiry.com/assets/docs/Inquiry_Report-Vol1.pdf'>http://www.midstaffsinquiry.com/assets/docs/Inquiry_Report-Vol1.pdf</a>\nGarrett, M. (2012) Re-enchanting social work? The emerging ‘spirit’ of social work in an age of economic crisis. <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, pp.1-19. DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs146. Advance Access published October 11, 2012\nGiroux, H., A., (2011) <i>On critical pedagogy</i>. London: Continuum\nGreen, L. C. (2006) Pariah profession, debased discipline? An analysis of social work’s low academic status and the possibilities for change, <i>Social Work Education</i>, 25. 3. 245-264\nHaringey Local Safeguarding Board (2009) <i>Serious Case Review: Baby Peter. Executive summary</i>. Available at: <a target="_blank" href='http://www.haringeylscb.org/executive_summary_peter_final.pdf'>http://www.haringeylscb.org/executive_summary_peter_final.pdf</a>\nHiggins, M. (2013) <i>The dilemmas of contemporary social work: a case study of the social work degree. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of London South Bank University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, July 2013</i>\nHiggins, M. and Goodyer, A. (2014) The Contradictions of Contemporary Social Work: An Ironic Response, British Journal of Social Work, pp. 1-14 doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu019\nHouse of Commons Children, Schools and Families Committee (2009) <i>Training of Children and Families Social Workers. Seventh report of session 2008-09. Volume 1</i>. London: The Stationery Office\nHumphrey, C. (2006) Tomorrow’s social workers in the UK. <i>European Journal of Social Work</i>, 9, 3, 357-373\nInternational Federation of Social Workers (2000) available at: <a target="_blank" href='http://www.ifsw.org/f38000138.html'>http://www.ifsw.org/f38000138.html</a>\nJack, G. and Donnellan, H. (2010) Recognising the person within the developing professional: Tracking the early careers of newly qualified child care social workers in three local authorities in England,. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 29, 3, 305-318\nLarrison, T., E. and Korr, W., S. (2013) Does social work have a signature pedagogy? <i>Journal of Social Work Education</i>, 49, 194-206\nMacAlister, J. with Crehan, L. and Olsen, A. (2012) <i>Front line: Improving the children’s social work profession</i>. Available at: <a target="_blank" href='http://www.nccesb.org.uk/pdfs/publication-frontline-childrens-social-work_Oct2012_9705.pdf'>http://www.nccesb.org.uk/pdfs/publication-frontline-childrens-social-work_Oct2012_9705.pdf</a>\nMoriarty J., MacIntyre, G., Manthorpe, J., Crisp, B., R., Orme, J., Green Lister, P., Cavanagh, K., Stevens, M., Shereen Hussein, S. and Sharpe, E. (2010) ‘My expectations remain the same. The student has to be competent to practise’: practice assessor perspectives on the new social work degree qualification in England, <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 40, 583–601. Advance Access publication 19/01/09\nMunro, E. (2011) <i>Review of Child Protection: Final Report</i> (2011). Available at: <a target="_blank" href='http://www.education.gov.uk/munroreview/'>http://www.education.gov.uk/munroreview/</a>\nParker, J. (2007) Developing effective practice learning for tomorrow’s social workers. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 26, 8, 763-779\nParsloe, P. (2001) Looking back on social work education. <i>Social Work Education</i>, 20, 1, 9-19\nQuality Assurance Agency (2008) <i>Benchmark statement for social work</i>. Available at: <a target="_blank" href='http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/socialwork08.pdf'>http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/socialwork08.pdf</a>\nRandall, J. (2002) The practice-research relationship: a case of ambivalent attachment? <i>Journal of Social Work</i>, 2, 1, 105-122\nRodie, S. (2008) Whistleblowing by students in practice learning setting: the student perspective. <i>Ethics and Social Welfare</i>, 2, 1, 95-99\nSainsbury, E. (1977) <i>The Personal Social Services</i>. London: Pitman\nShulman, L.S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. <i>Daedalus</i>, 134, 3, 52-59\nSingh, G. And Cowden, S. (2009) The social worker as intellectual. <i>European Journal of Social Work</i>, 31, 3, 1-15\nSocial Work Action Network (2014) <i>In Defence of Social Work: why Michael Gove is wrong</i>\nSocial Work Reform Board (2011) <i>Building a Safe and Confident Future: Improving the quality and consistency of initial qualifying social work education and training</i>. Available at: <a target="_blank" href='http://www.collegeofsocialwork.org/uploadedFiles/TheCollege/Practice/Improving%20the%20quality%20and%20consistency%20of%20initial%20qualifying%20social%20work%20education%20and%20training.pdf'>http://www.collegeofsocialwork.org/uploadedFiles/TheCollege/Practice/Improving%20the%20quality%20and%20consistency%20of%20initial%20qualifying%20social%20work%20education%20and%20training.pdf</a>\nSocial Work Task Force (2009) <i>Building a Safe, Confident Future: The final report of the Social Work Task Force</i>. Available at: <a target="_blank" href='https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/01114-2009DOM-EN.pdf'>https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/01114-2009DOM-EN.pdf</a>\nSpours, K., Young, M., Howieson, C. and Raffe, D. (2000) Skills development in higher education and employment. in F. Coffield (Ed) <i>Differing Visions of a Learning Society</i>. Bristol: Policy Press\nWayne, J., Bogo, M., and Raskin, M. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social work education: congruence and disparity. <i>Journal of Social Work Education</i>, 46, 327-339\nWilson, G. and Kelly, B. (2010) Evaluating the effectiveness of social work education: preparing students for practice learning, <i>British Journal of Social Work</i>, 40, pp. 2431-2449. Advance Access publication February 23, 2010\nWoodward, R. and Mackay, K. (2012) Mind the gap! Students’ understanding and applications of social work values, <i>Social Work Education</i>, 31, 8, 1090-1104\nYin, R., K. (2009), <i>Case Study Research</i>. (4th ed.) London: Sage\n
Published
2014-05-16
How to Cite
Higgins, M. (2014). Can practice educators be a ‘bridge’ between the academy and the practicum?. The Journal of Practice Teaching and Learning, 12(3), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v12i3.294
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright lies with the journal. Enquiries regarding reproduction should be sent in the first place to enquiries@whitingbirch.net.
