‘Shadowing’ and its place in preparing students for practice learning

Jonathan Parker; Mel Hughes; Lynne Rutter

doi:10.1921/jpts.v7i3.352

Authors

Jonathan Parker
Mel Hughes
Lynne Rutter

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1921/jpts.v7i3.352

Keywords:

shadowing placements, preparations for practice, self-efficacy

Abstract

Summary: As part of the new social work degree in England all students must undergo a period of assessed preparation for practice learning which includes the opportunity to shadow an experienced social worker. This requirement has been implemented in different ways across social work programmes in England and providers have raised concerns about the assessment of students’ fitness to undertake practice learning. This article explores the background to and potential of ‘shadowing’ as observational and preparatory leaning and surveys some of the differential practice amongst English social work programme providers. Following this, the article describes a small-scale research study in which the confidence (self-efficacy beliefs) of students were monitored before and after undertaking shadowing experiences and qualitative reports concerning the experiences were collected and reviewed. The study recommends the development of a rigorous approach to shadowing, that is assessed, made integral to social work programmes and is adequately resourced.

References

Bandura, A. (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Review, 84, 2, 191-215\nBandura, A. (1986) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall\nBandura, A. (1994) Self-efficacy. in V.S. Ramchandran (Ed.) Encyclopaedia of Human Behavior. (Vol. 4) New York: Academic Press\nBarlow, C. and Coleman, H. (2003) Suitability for practice guidelines for students: A survey of Canadian social work programmes. Social Work Education, 22, 2, 151-64\nDepartment of Health (2002) Requirements for Social Work Training. London: Department of Health\nDouglas, H. and Byrne, M. (2005) Improvement by degrees: Reflections on developing quality in practice learning for the new degree in social work in Northern Ireland. Journal of Practice Teaching in Health and Social Work. 6, 3, 45-61\nFurness, S. and Gilligan, P. (2004) Fit for purpose: Issues from practice placements, practice teaching and the assessment of students’ practice. Social Work Education. 23, 4, 465-479\nGelman, C.R. (2004) Anxiety experienced by foundation-year MSW students entering field placement: Implications for admissions, curriculum and field education. Journal of Social Work Education. 40, 1, 39-54\nGeneral Social Care Council (2003) GSCC Arrangements for Monitoring Social Work Degree Courses: Information for course providers and external examiners. London: GSCC\nGould, N. (2000) Becoming a learning organization. Social Work Education, 19, 6, 585-596\nHolden, G., Meenaghan, T., Anastas, J. and Metrey, G. (2002) Outcomes of social work education: The case for social work self-efficacy. Journal of Social Work Education, 38, 1, 115-33\nHorner, N. (2006) What is Social Work? (2nd ed.) Exeter: Learning Matters\nLave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press\nLe Riche, P. (2006) Practicing observation in shadowing: Curriculum innovation and learning outcomes in the BA Social Work. Social Work Education, 25, 8, 771-784\nMacaulay, C. 2000. Transfer of learning.in: V. E. Cree & C. Macaulay, Transfer of Learning in Professional and Vocational Learning. London: Routledge\nMaidment, J. (2003) Problems experienced by students on field placement: using research findings to inform curriculum design and content. Australian Social Work, 56 1, 50-60\nMoon, J.(1999) Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and practice. London: Kogan Paul\nPajares, F. (2002) Overview of Social Cognitive Theory and of Self-Efficacy [accessed 14th February 2005, from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html'>http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html]</a>\nParker, J. (2005) Should you encourage students to assess themselves in practice learning? A guided self-efficacy approach to practice learning. Journal of Practice Teaching in Health and Social Work, 6, 3, 8-30\nParker, J. (2006) Developing perceptions of competence during practice learning. British Journal of Social Work. 36, 1017-1036\nParker, J. (forthcoming) Developing practice learning for tomorrow’s social workers. Social Work Education\nPlath, D. (2003) An experienced based model for practice learning: International perspective from Australia. Journal of Practice Teaching in Health and Social Work, 5, 1, 23-38\nQAA (2000) Academic Standards: Social Work. (subject benchmark statement), Gloucester: QAA\nShardlow, S. and Doel, M. (1996) Practice Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Macmillan\nThompson, N. (2006) Anti-Discriminatory Practice. (4th ed.) Basingstoke: Palgrave\nTOPSS (2002) National Occupational Standards for social workers. [accessed 22nd January 2007 from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.topssengland.net/files/cd/England/Main.htm'>http://www.topssengland.net/files/cd/England/Main.htm]</a>\nWalton, C. (2005) How well does the preparation for practice delivered at the university prepare the student for their first practice learning opportunity in the Social Work Degree? Journal of Practice Teaching, 6, 3, 62-81\nWeade, G and Evertson, C. M. (1991) On what can be learned by observing teaching. Theory into Practice. 30, 1, 37-45.\n